Granted, the part

The globally recommended app by privacy and security experts, Signal, is now being downloaded massively and tops the Danish Google Play Store

is a little ironic, but you gotta push this winning tide and then work from that.

  • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    How? You have two arbitrary computers exchanging TCP packets. There is no way to tell any difference.

    • plyth@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      As I wrote before, trustworthy apps register their connection at the registry.

      • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        You are not making sense. You can register as many apps as you want, if there is no way to distinguish non-registered app traffic from regular internet traffic.

        • plyth@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          There is no need to distinguish the traffic. IP adresses and ports identify the streams.

          The app creates a connection and registers both IPs and ports at the registry.

          Then the app starts sending data.

          The first router at an internet exchange point asks the registry if the IPs and ports are registered. If they are, the packets are delivered, if not they are dropped.

          That way no unregistered app can exchange data.

            • plyth@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              All websites keep working. All commercial apps will be adjusted and keep working. At first users just receive warnings and all apps keep working.

              The internet won’t shut down when finally the packets are dropped. Only democracy will die, silently.

              • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Look, this discussion is going nowhere, as you clearly have no idea how the internet actually functions. If websites keep working you can continue sending e2e encrypted messages from an unregistered app. Please educate yourself first and then you will realize how nonsensical your idea is.

                • plyth@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  If websites keep working you can continue sending e2e encrypted messages from an unregistered app.

                  You can also send e2ee messages with Whatsapp if you copy and paste them. At some point, encryption of messages doesn’t help because it’s suspicious enough that further investigations are triggered.

                  Of course you can create a secret messenger service hidden on a regular website. But it’s either unknown which makes it useless, or popular which will attract an investigation.

                  • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    No, any normal easy to use federated XMPP app will work with built in e2ee. There is no real difference between an app communicating with a server and a browser communicating with a webserver, and for an outside observer there is no easy way to tell them apart.

                    Please educate yourself better about this topic. You make yourself look really stupid 🤷

                    Oh and WhatApp is already e2ee.