• TheWonderfool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    It is still comically low… From 200k to 300k per year, regardless of whatever income they have, in the hope that coming to Italy they will “trickle down” their wealth (we know well how ridiculous that statement is).

    The worst part is that it was made by a centre-right government masquerading as centre-left…

    • iagomago@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      5 days ago

      Just to be clear, this government isn’t trying in any way to masquerade itself as centre-left. FdI is right wing through and through, it demonizes the left all the time and treats insignificant changes such as this one or occupational rate (obtained through Draconian revision of national contracts) as “real work for the people”, not “like the elitist left”. They are populist, that’s what they are.

      • TheWonderfool@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        5 days ago

        Sorry, I was not clear. The government that made the first law (100k “flat tax” for rich people moving to Italy) was the PD (theoretically centre-left) guided by Renzi (that I would consider 100% centre-right politician, hence what I meant)…

        I am completely agree that FdI is far-right, hell many members of the government are big fans of Mussolini and the fascist party…

    • vga@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Is that a percentage of income still? I probably wouldn’t have to pay that much if I ran off to Italy, right? It’s about triple my yearly gross salary…

      • TheWonderfool@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        It is basically a ceiling to how much you can pay in taxes.

        A foreigner moving to Italy can either

        • enter the normal taxation regime, and pay according to all (domestic and foreign) incomes they have;
        • decide to pay 200.000€ a year + 25.000€ per family member, no questions asked on foreign income (for up to 15 years).
  • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Is that supposed to say “50 percent”? I have never seen “percent” abbreviated like that, why not just use “%” instead?

  • huppakee@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    You can be a foreigner, no problem. You can be super-rich, that’s fine. But both? Unacceptable.

    • talkingpumpkin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      TBH being poor and a foreigner is far worse in these people’s eyes. And god forbid if on top of that you are fleeing a country where war or persecution threaten your existence.

  • manxu@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 days ago

    All we need is one government that taxes the super-rich to show that the story of instant capital flight is a fairy tale. There is no economically sound way to escape some form of wealth tax, and that’s what you hear when one is brought up.

      • manxu@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        That’s a good thing! Billionaires are not really afraid of taxes, what do they care if they have 25 or 24 billion? What difference does it possibly make?

    • Skua@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      I believe this is almost exclusively a Telegraph thing, and even then mostly in headlines. From their style guide:

      “Percentages: per cent does not take a full point. Use pc only in headlines and % only in tables. In City page copy pc is acceptable.”

      The same section of the style guide chooses to use hundredweights as an example unit of weight, so I definitely think there’s a significant degree to which they’ve just always done it and do not want to change it

  • randomname@scribe.disroot.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    the prospect of a fresh increase in the levy will spark concerns among the many non-doms who have fled to Milan from the UK

    I don’t think so. Ms. Meloni seeks some money supposedly to fund promised tax deceases for low and middle-class earners. But this is not a game changer imho, neither for the government nor the few thousand individuals that are affected imho.