cross-posted from: https://mander.xyz/post/45051999

“Inflation … starts to rise, especially when, as in Russia, government spending does not go toward anything productive that would help the economy grow. Money loses value, consumption becomes harder, real income growth stops, the stimulus runs out, inflation falls, and the economy begins to retreat. In Russia, this stage has lasted since late 2024. That means the economy has not grown in real terms for a year. Some sectors have begun to decline, and consumption is starting to stagnate.”

Fear of inflation and a reluctance to explain to society why it has been forced to make such large and seemingly pointless sacrifices have combined to push the regime toward an austerity policy for 2026 — raising taxes and cutting spending — including on the military, if official budget figures for next year are to be believed.

But this belt-tightening has come too late. The burden placed on the economy’s net donors — the people and enterprises forced to subsidize everyone else — has already become excessive. Under its weight, the productive sector has begun to contract, causing tax revenues levied on profits, turnover, value added, and existing assets to fall.

The Russian economy that enters 2026 is like a group of people standing on a slowly melting ice floe. The support structure is melting on its own, but the unfortunate polar explorers are also constantly breaking off ever-larger chunks and, out of spite, throwing them at equally desperate people on a neighboring floe. It is hard even to imagine the effort and sacrifices that will be required to return to normality once the leadership on the “Russia” ice floe inevitably changes.

Web archive link

  • kossa@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    Any second now, the weak enemy, that is Russia, will falter, because they are so weak. But at the same time, they are so threatening, that we must triple our armed forces, because our enemy, that is Russia, is so strong.

    • Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      Economically weak doesn’t mean militarily weak, you still need to defend against a military that sees it’s last option as throwing a few nukes at whomever seems least likely to swat them down.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        I could see Putin falling back on nukes, I cannot see Russian commanders pushing the button. Same for Trump and the American general staff.

      • kossa@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yep, our bolstered conventional weapons will surely halt their nuking when the time comes. I am fine with both perspectives, I hate the double-speech within.

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Interceptor missiles are and have been a thing since the early 60s. Defense spending doesn’t necessarily mean subs and tanks.

          • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            I think I read somewhere that the UK is developing a new lazer that can take down hypersonic ballistic missiles for approximately the cost of the electricity it consumes. Pretty sweet if true.

            • Madison420@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              I don’t think Russia has an effective stock of hypersonics tbh. If we’ve learned anything it’s that Russian equipment stocks are mostly lies and lack of maintenance.

              • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                While true, I don’t think we should base our entire defense strategy on hoping that the russians are so incompetent that they can’t even deploy their most destructive munitions…

                • Madison420@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Well no I mean they almost certainly have a functioning nuclear stockpile, I mean they’re almost certainly lying about how many hypersonics they have.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Russian commanders ignored launch orders in the Cold War and I believe they would do so again.

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Just because their economy is on the verge of collapse doesn’t mean they won’t keep sending millions of “undesirables” into the meat grinder.

      They might be lacking in heavy equipment and expertise in maneuver warfare, but a million invaders still takes about a million rounds of ammo to pacify.

      We can hope the russian economy collapses and the empire balkanizes, effectively making it impossible for them to keep up their war of attrition. The sooner it ends, the sooner we can stop producing munitions and the sooner people stop dying.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Americans spent about 1,000,000 rounds for every kill in Iraq. More like 1,000,000,000,000 rounds. :)

        • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          And the WMDs were a lie, but that doesn’t change the reality for Europe today, which is that russia is still a threat at least until their economy collapses and their federation dissolves.