cross-posted from: https://mander.xyz/post/45051999
…
“Inflation … starts to rise, especially when, as in Russia, government spending does not go toward anything productive that would help the economy grow. Money loses value, consumption becomes harder, real income growth stops, the stimulus runs out, inflation falls, and the economy begins to retreat. In Russia, this stage has lasted since late 2024. That means the economy has not grown in real terms for a year. Some sectors have begun to decline, and consumption is starting to stagnate.”
Fear of inflation and a reluctance to explain to society why it has been forced to make such large and seemingly pointless sacrifices have combined to push the regime toward an austerity policy for 2026 — raising taxes and cutting spending — including on the military, if official budget figures for next year are to be believed.
But this belt-tightening has come too late. The burden placed on the economy’s net donors — the people and enterprises forced to subsidize everyone else — has already become excessive. Under its weight, the productive sector has begun to contract, causing tax revenues levied on profits, turnover, value added, and existing assets to fall.
The Russian economy that enters 2026 is like a group of people standing on a slowly melting ice floe. The support structure is melting on its own, but the unfortunate polar explorers are also constantly breaking off ever-larger chunks and, out of spite, throwing them at equally desperate people on a neighboring floe. It is hard even to imagine the effort and sacrifices that will be required to return to normality once the leadership on the “Russia” ice floe inevitably changes.
…
Economically weak doesn’t mean militarily weak, you still need to defend against a military that sees it’s last option as throwing a few nukes at whomever seems least likely to swat them down.
I could see Putin falling back on nukes, I cannot see Russian commanders pushing the button. Same for Trump and the American general staff.
Yep, our bolstered conventional weapons will surely halt their nuking when the time comes. I am fine with both perspectives, I hate the double-speech within.
Interceptor missiles are and have been a thing since the early 60s. Defense spending doesn’t necessarily mean subs and tanks.
I think I read somewhere that the UK is developing a new lazer that can take down hypersonic ballistic missiles for approximately the cost of the electricity it consumes. Pretty sweet if true.
I don’t think Russia has an effective stock of hypersonics tbh. If we’ve learned anything it’s that Russian equipment stocks are mostly lies and lack of maintenance.
While true, I don’t think we should base our entire defense strategy on hoping that the russians are so incompetent that they can’t even deploy their most destructive munitions…
Well no I mean they almost certainly have a functioning nuclear stockpile, I mean they’re almost certainly lying about how many hypersonics they have.
Even one is enough to kill a lot of people. A laser that can destroy them in orbit is an ideal solution.
You understand I’m not arguing against any defense solution. Follow the thread up and you’ll be less confused.
Russian commanders ignored launch orders in the Cold War and I believe they would do so again.