Well, before the shitty take of “ice ban” everybody and their mother from the conservatives were dreaming about efuels. So no, if those were made viable, ices are not ‘banned’.
It is as “technology open” as it could be. Like: propel your cars however you want, as long as they don’t emit carbon dioxide, is a pretty fair regulation. They could also put horses on a treadmill inside the car to fullfill the obligation, but, alas, that is probably not going to fly in the market. But that doesn’t make it a “horses on treadmill”-ban. It is the invisible hand of the market all these people love so much.
They could also put horses on a treadmill inside the car to fullfill the obligation, but, alas, that is probably not going to fly in the market.
I checked with Perplexity
A Tesla Model 3 cannot practically be powered by a horse, since the electrical power a horse can generate on a running wheel is about 0.5 to 0.7 kW, while the Tesla requires significantly more power when driving — on average around 15–20 kW in everyday use, and up to 370 kW under full acceleration.
I am firmly commited to invent the first horse-elctric drive. Has lots of upsides. You can do plug in vehicles, can charge by sun or grass. Have horse swappings stations along the way to increase range.
There is no combustion engine ban and it’s fuckung annoying how press just picked up some right wing wording and ran with it.
Yeah there was an article about it right here on Lemmyverse some time ago.
It’s. Not. A. Ban.
The emission rules for new cars however will become very strict in 2035, incl. CO2.
deleted by creator
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/en/article/20221019STO44572/eu-ban-on-sale-of-new-petrol-and-diesel-cars-from-2035-explained
If no new cars may produce CO2 emissions after 2035, then in reality that’s a ban on new cars with combustion engines, no?
Well, before the shitty take of “ice ban” everybody and their mother from the conservatives were dreaming about efuels. So no, if those were made viable, ices are not ‘banned’.
It is as “technology open” as it could be. Like: propel your cars however you want, as long as they don’t emit carbon dioxide, is a pretty fair regulation. They could also put horses on a treadmill inside the car to fullfill the obligation, but, alas, that is probably not going to fly in the market. But that doesn’t make it a “horses on treadmill”-ban. It is the invisible hand of the market all these people love so much.
I checked with Perplexity
So more like 21 Horses.
Because of the detour to generate electricity first. Just let the treadmill directly turn the wheels.
Have you checked whether the 21 horses powered car would conquer the market though? Maybe we’re on to something.
I am firmly commited to invent the first horse-elctric drive. Has lots of upsides. You can do plug in vehicles, can charge by sun or grass. Have horse swappings stations along the way to increase range.
Would be awesome, if the whole Roman wayside inn/horse changing system to deliver fast messages across the continent would make a comeback 😅.
Seems to be economically unfeasible though
https://www.transportenvironment.org/articles/running-a-truck-on-e-diesel-costs-47-more-than-its-battery-electric-counterpart
Well, the allmighty free market has chosen ¯\_(ツ)_/¯. But nobody banned efuels, was just a shitty idea to begin with.
No? Not German here, but I heard that the EU is going to stop producing benzin cars at '35 or somewhere near that date.
They’ll ban permission of new ICE vehicles that run with fossil fuels, yet ICEs using e-fuels exclusively are a viable, but costly, option.