TL;DR:

  • In a move to meet carbon reduction goals, the EU started to recycle aluminium.
  • Chinese buyers now snapping up aluminium scrap, smelting it an sell it back to Europe as new metal
  • Novelis, the industry’s largest recycler, calls on the EU to curb exports of metal scrap to China and the US

Archived link

The EU’s recycling system is being weaponised against the bloc by Chinese buyers snapping up aluminium scrap, smelting it and exporting it back to Europe as newly produced metal, according to the industry’s largest recycler.

Emilio Braghi, executive vice-president of Novelis, [said] the sector risked what he described as terminal decline unless Brussels acted on its pledge to curb the export of scrap to Asia and the US.

“We have lost primary production. Now we are at risk of losing aluminium scrap,” he said, noting that Europe would be unable to meet its own environmental goals if this was the case.

EU producers pay energy prices up to four times those of their competitors, so have shifted to remelting scrap which is more energy efficient.

The recycling drive is part of EU efforts to reduce its carbon emissions to net zero by 2050, and to retain more critical materials in the bloc to avoid dependence on Chinese imports.

Unlike other parts of the world, Europe is unique in consumer behaviour and its willingness to pay more for recycled products out of a concern for the environment and climate change, Braghi said.

“We see that pull from consumers, whether they are buying a new car or they are buying an aluminium can, based on high recycled content. We don’t see that elsewhere.”

  • Skasi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    The TL;DR is misleading. The EU has not “started to recycle aluminum”. It had already done so for a long long time. I feel like the TL;DR also singles out China, seeing as it fails to mention that US companies are also increasingly importing scrap.

    • j5906@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      if you feel like the TLDR singles out China, its because the OP randomname along with sepia and hotznplotzn (likely all the same guy) just spam posts everything “China bad”.

      Literally half my lemmy feed sometimes is them, they have like over 1000 posts on every account with 95% being “China bad”.

      I mean everyones entitled to their opinion, but in a recent thread about users should post more there were people being like “I am doing my part” who considered themselfs frequent posters with like 30 posts…

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      US companies are also increasingly importing scrap

      because some idiot put a tariff on Canadian aluminum even though the US cannot possibly make enough aluminum for their demand.

    • dubak@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      The report is a compendium of unsourced claims made by an executive of an US aluminium company Novelis. There is an older piece by FT with more serious sources. It has no mention of China. However, it says:

      Washington has imposed 50 per cent tariffs on imports of steel and aluminium, but not on scrap. As a result, US smelters have increased purchases of European scrap to produce fresh metal and avoid tariffs.

      • Skasi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        That’s all very interesting, so if the your linked article is older, does that mean Chinese companies are copying US ones on this? Or maybe it’s not as simple as that. Either way, to me it sounds like the Indian-owned US subsidiary Novelis has created facilities in Europe and did not account for aluminum scrap getting bought up by other companies.

        • dubak@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          does that mean Chinese companies are copying US ones on this?

          Trump administration imposed tariffs on EU steel in March 2025. Did China also impose tariffs on EU steel in the meantime? Or, why should chinese companies copy the american companies?

          • Skasi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Trump administration imposed tariffs on EU steel in March 2025

            I don’t know how old your linked article is, as it’s behind a paywall, but according to different sources aluminum US tariffs on aluminum were already implemented or increased in June 2018.

            Did China also impose tariffs on EU steel in the meantime? Or, why should chinese companies copy the american companies?

            The EU Packaging Waste Regulation laws which demand higher recycling rates were enacted in 2025. So considering the 2018s tariffs, US companies had reasons to import aluminum scrap for 7 more years. The increases in available scrap and on tariffs in 2025 surely strengthened this though.

            • dubak@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              I don’t know how old your linked article is, as it’s behind a paywall, but according to different sources aluminum US tariffs on aluminum were already implemented or increased in June 2018.

              Trump introduced 25% tarif in March 2025 which was doubled to 50% in June 2025. Another source

              • Skasi@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                That doesn’t negate the fact that he already introduced tariffs on aluminum in 2018.

    • randomname@scribe.disroot.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      The vast majority of the material in this scenario can be attributed to China. This is also what the original article’s headline and content suggests.