Archived version

Amid the backdrop of its spat with Japan, Beijing has hosted a flurry of recent diplomatic activity with European leaders. German Vice Chancellor and Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil visited in November, followed this month by French President Emmanuel Macron and German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul.

This whirlwind of visits follows a similar active scene in the fall, when European leaders visited Japan during the World Expo Osaka.

The timing of the European leaders’ visits to China comes at a curious time for Japan. Last month in parliament, Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi made comments about a Taiwan emergency that triggered a furious response from China.

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi has been using his meetings with European officials to push Beijing’s narrative about the dispute.

He reportedly told Wadephul that, unlike Germany, Japan has not thoroughly reflected on its history of aggression even 80 years after World War II.

He told French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot that Beijing believes France will understand and support China’s legitimate position, according to the Chinese Foreign Ministry.

The European countries have refrained from commenting on these reports directly, an attitude that can be interpreted as tacit approval.

But Japan should not be too concerned about Europe cozying up to China. The recent diplomatic visits were mostly planned before Takaichi took office. European diplomacy in Asia typically balances visits among Japan, China, India and other major countries.

Europe’s basic position is to position Japan as a country with which it shares democratic values and the rule of law.

Beijing is trying to spread the narrative that Tokyo is reverting to its militaristic ways, but EU policymakers are not buying it. Rather, they see China’s hegemonic ambitions as increasing the risk of a Taiwan conflict, forcing Japan to respond.

The Chinese government’s call for its citizens to refrain from traveling to Japan has been widely reported in Europe. Meanwhile, China has a history of using export controls on rare-earth elements to pressure European companies. When these factors are combined, the image in Europe of China as an authoritarian state that uses economic coercion as a weapon grows stronger.

Policymakers in major European economies frequently exchange information and coordinate China policies, though approaches vary across the continent. Long-term plans are emerging to reduce economic dependence on China, tighten regulations on Chinese companies operating in the European market and control the inflow of Chinese products into Europe.

Europe is pursuing strategic autonomy while seeking to distance itself from both Washington – which it is also at odds with – and Beijing moving forward. It is quietly working to de-risk from both powers as part of its long-term strategy to strengthen itself as an economic bloc.

Signs are emerging that China’s excessive pressure on Japan is failing to win over Europe.

Japan must clearly demonstrate that it is a country based on the rule of law and an open society, and that it is a defender of liberal democracy and market economics. If Takaichi uses Group of Seven summits and other forums to explain this thoroughly, Europe will listen.

Now is the time to deepen cooperation with democratic forces in the Indo-Pacific region like South Korea, Taiwan and Australia, and gird against authoritarian states seeking to disrupt the international order.

  • rustyfish@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 days ago

    Just because China is a paper tiger doesn’t mean they won’t try. Look at Russia. They are laughably incompetent (just like China) but they are still murdering innocent people, just like China is with the Uyghurs inside the country.

    Any country has the right to defend itself from Chinese terror.

    • optissima@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’ll try one last time: Which neighbors is it threatening to invade? When was the last time China invaded anywhere? We have seen Russia invade others for over a decade but China, despite being the most powerful economy since 2016 according to american economists, hasn’t. You’d think they’d be empowered after seeing minimal pushback on Crimea, but again they haven’t.

      • hubobes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        China annexed Tibet in 1959. Additionally you do have to be ignorant to not see that they very obviously threaten to invade Taiwan at some point if they will not let themselves get absorbed peacefully.

        • optissima@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          You got it! The last 66 years of not invading anyone of their 76 year existence. Seems odd that people are convinced they’re going to invade anywhere when they haven’t for a majority of anyones memory. It hurts to see so much manufactured consent there is here after seeing the us and europe invade the middle east continuously for all of my life based on lies, yet no doubt when there is a new place to claim they’re about to attack any moment. Hurts to see.

      • stickly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Which neighbors is it threatening to invade?

        “It’s not threatening to invade, we’re just coincidentally running an amphibious assault war game right across the strai-- oops don’t mind those missiles, shot those a little too far 🤭”

        If you’re going to be a disingenuous sea lion at least skip to claiming “it’s a valid casus belli and blah blah blah”. It’d save us all a lot of time.

        • optissima@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Thank you for the link! I wasn’t sea lioning, I was asking for a claim to be backed up with a source. I appreciate you linking it and I’ll check it out.

          edit: after following sources I dont see that there were any accidents that occured? I do see that in the linked reuters source “Taiwan’s defence ministry said it had detected no live fire drills around the island itself,” so where is said accident? Unless you are saying that the games themselves are making them feel threatened, which I can understand. They are on the island that China drove the previous, highly oppressive, government to and is currently a vassal of the superpower that keeps talking about wanting to go to war with them afyer failing to oppress them.

          • stickly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            It’s textbook sea lioning: asking for information you can easily find yourself as a civil question and now backing out of it to some other tangential sticking point.

            The missile comment was a tongue in cheek reference to the third Taiwan strait missile crisis. Even worse than accidental, they just straight up said “[the missile tests] attacked the power of the ‘Taiwan separatists’”. There’s no way to reconcile that with your imagined warm and fuzzy peaceful-reunification world super power.

            previous, highly oppressive, government to and is currently a vassal …

            Ah there it is. Does an oppressive government give you free reign to attack the sovereignty of a neighbor? That sure smells a lot like America-style “liberation”. But of course when America does it we call it imperialist.

            And spare me this cold war era quid pro quo defense. No superpower in history has ever been in such desperate straits that aggressive action against a minor power was critical to their security. It’s just a convenient excuse to play international power games.

            • optissima@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              I have been finding internet searches very unreliable in the last year, so yeah I’m not sealioning if someone is making unsourced claims.

              I’ll end with this: China’s not perfect, it’s far from it. There are issues, like them holding the indian woman mentioned here. The issue is that everyone keeps calling China aggressive and threatening, using the same rhetoric that has been used by bullies to justify attacking more peaceful groups time immemorial.

            • optissima@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              If the oppressive governement was the one you drove out of your country and they keep calling for your destruction while killing people you were liberating, yes?

              • stickly@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 days ago

                Just to be clear, you’re on board with America bombing Iran then? Their entire modern political identity has been based around American antagonism (or Great Satan if you prefer) and they’ve been tied by proxy to violence that has killed Americans.

                Or if not, are we going to talk about how Taiwan has been consistently ranked among the top countries in democratic representation since the end of martial law nearly 40 years ago? Maybe this Taiwan authoritarian boogeyman is only being propped up by the PRC’s saber rattling?

                If there wasn’t a constant threat across the water, we’d probably find that the Taiwan populace isn’t in favor of the war hawk conservatives but also isn’t in favor of reunification. But the status quo is better for everyone: China gets to keep its “liberation” card, Taiwan regressives get to keep their national security platform and the USA gets a plausible excuse to expand their military sphere of dominance.

                Keep waving your team colors though 👍