• psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Gorilla are pure herbivores, chimpanzees are predators which mostly eat plants, I don’t know about Bonobos, all that’s talked about them is their seed life, and homo varies from pure carnivore (in cold places, those with few edible plants) to scavenger to omnivore (especially in the tropics and places with fruit) depending on environment

      Homo, of course, has been lying to itself about what food best sustains it, we can’t live happily on the excess grain we’ve been producing for the last 10k years

    • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      By far the most dangerous predator on Earth is humans, we eat each other, anything that moves, kill for fun, build machines to do it for us, design what we eat to be easier to kill, and have you dealt with women? We’re a scary bunch.

  • saltesc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    203
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I think that’s specific to mammals. Just off the top of my head…

    Invertebrates? No. All out

    Fish? No. Also a Hammerhead would’ve really sold this comic lol.

    Birds? No. Though, even on the side they do often have a tilt toward frontal in a lot of predatory birds. It could be argued…

    Reptiles? No.

    Amphibians? No. There’s no even trying to place rules on that optical chaos.

    Mammals? Yeah, pretty much. Can’t think of an outlier but I’m sure there’s plenty of obvious ones.

    Edit’ Ah, there we go. Of course marine mammals are an exception. But back in land, as too are llamas. Makes you wonder…what are the llamas plotting?

    • pjwestin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Birds? No. Though, even on the side they do often have a tilt toward frontal in a lot of predatory birds. It could be argued…

      Birds of prey absolutely have their eyes positioned on the front of their heads. It’s most obvious in owls, since they have the largest eyes and wider faces, but all of them have front-facing eyes for binocular vision.

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Convergent evolution has more to do with environment and trophic structure than it has to do with lineage. Any animal that can produce a complex eye can have similar evolutionary pressure given similar environments unless there’s some other stronger pressure.

      Animals low to the ground or water often have slitted eyes (including goats who spend a of time with their heads down)

    • Typhoon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Most primates eat fruit or leaves, but have forward facing eyes because they need depth perception for climbing/jumping, not for hunting.

        • Fedizen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          If a squirrel falls they’re probably not going to squish as hard as a monkey. Lots of scavengers also have forward facing eyes (ex racoons) and pandas notably have forward facing eyes and are herbivorous.

          I think the climbing and jumping theory is better than the predator theory on account that it explains why large aquatic animals aren’t selected for close frontal eyes.

          Plus many predators (cats notably) do climb and jump. Humans and monkeys also have werd postures that might lead to them falling over easier.

          In reality its probably never just one pressure that leads to these kind of evolutions.

        • psud@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Other theories are for depth perception for getting at fruit in trees, another is the first but they need depth perception because they’re bigger than a squirrel

    • marzhall@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Invertebrates? No. All out

      I invite you to meet the awesome jumping spider, whose eyes are very especially needed set up to be forward-facing for depth perception for their jumps, and who hunt other spiders, as well as the wolf spider, who are also a hunting (as opposed to web) spider.

      In fact, you can use the chart of spider eye layouts to pretty much identify whether you’re looking at a spider who builds webs and waits or a spider who hunts:

       a drawing of different spider faces to their names

      Anyone with two big forward-facing eyes is probably looking around for their next meal; the rest are building a web, trapdoor, or taking some other approach.

      • KingGimpicus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Had a bunch of wolf spiders in the last shop i worked at as a welder. They have eye shine like cats and alligators. It was always easy to tell the wolf spiders from black widows even behind a dusty welding machine because you can see the little wolf spider eyes looking back at you.

      • monotremata@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Also crabs. I mean, their eyes are often on stalks and more mobile than mammalian eyes, and they’re compound, so they have a very wide field of view, but they’re still often basically in front, and they do apparently provide depth cues for hunting thanks to this.

        https://www.jneurosci.org/content/38/31/6933

        It also occurred to me to look up about dragonflies, and it seems they mostly hunt dorsally (which is a pretty viable option if you’re flying). BUT I found this article about Damselflies, which notes that they rely on binocular overlap and line up their prey in front of them. Which is pretty cool.

        https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982219316641

        • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Horseshoe crabs have nine different types of eyes. Even that tail is essentially a kind of eye, covered with photoreceptors. Not sure of the relevance of this horseshoe crab fact, it’s just fucking interesting.

    • sbird@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      whales and dolphins are mammals, and they have eyes on the side. Don’t think anything preys on them (at least for the full-grown ones, pretty sure baby whales are preyed on)

      • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Sperm whales are apex(orcas will target calves but they stay the hell away from bulls) but they don’t hunt their monstrous cephalopod prey with eyes.

    • illi@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I remember there used to be a goat on some island (now extinct) that didn’t have any predators so it evolved forward facing eyes

        • pjwestin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Yeah, but Pandas aren’t herbivores, they’re vegetarians. They’re too slow and clumsy to actually hunt prey, so the only thing they can catch is bamboo (which is the fastest growing plant, so I guess that’s something…sort of…). Anyway, the point is, Pandas as a species are from a family of predators, and they would absolutely eat meat if you gave it to them.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Pandas are descendants of omnivores with a predator streak, them rat fucking their diet to near koala levels of bad doesn’t really factor in yet.

        • notsure@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          22 hours ago

          …i am withholding all judgments on pandas until my full research has been completed…i heard something on the internet…

        • Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 hours ago

          But Pandas are bears and haven’t changed much. They eat plants and their guts have not even evolved to do so yet. They are a wonder.

        • sbird@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Is this because pandas used to be carnivorous? (they have sharp canine teeth despite pretty much only eating bamboo)

          • saltesc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            By far. We didn’t get to be #1 by fucking around, and we didn’t get to be #1 without all that dominating evolution lingering around. We’re so good at it, we’re predators to ourselves because there’s no prey left to dominate. Every other species dies farmed or as a hobby.

            But I can say, that if I were die be prey to something, I’d rather it be to a human. Everything else starts eating you before you’re even dead lol.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        Sloths are weird all the extinct sloths had side eyes. The ones today dont. I’m guessing depth perception for climbing. Because the list goes really big when arboreal prey animals are involved. Lemurs, sugar gliders monkeys great apes.

    • sbird@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Bats also have forward facing eyes I think (correct me on this please!), but most of them aren’t carnivorous. They eat fruits and bugs and stuff.

      • illi@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        18 hours ago

        They eat fruits and bugs and stuff.

        Well, if they hunt bugs, they are predators, no?

        • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Predators yes, carnivores no. Things that eat bugs are insectivores.

          Honestly though, almost no mammals are purely carnivorous, herbivorous, or insectivorous. The majority of species will opportunistically eat what is available.

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        I would assume insects would be evolutionarily similar to other types or prey.

        Although I’m not sure most bats have forward facing eyes anyway.

      • psud@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        I don’t think anything is preying upon gorillas, the biggest predators for chimps are chimps and humans, though young ones are taken by birds too

        Humans in the wild are prey to crocodile, big cats, bears, wolves and young ones from an even longer list

        Humans and chimpanzees are definitely predators. Humans who lived through the recent ice age outside the tropics were pure carnivores as no edible plants grow on glaciers; all the big animals and most of the dangerous ones went extinct just after humans got to an area

        Bonobos eat fruit. Not much eats them

        The apes are all pretty good at defending themselves and are their own worst enemy

      • Starski@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        What do you mean by prey animals? Animals that prey on others or are you calling them prey themselves? And just because an animal is a predator doesn’t mean there aren’t larger predators that will kill and eat them. Ultimately most apes are omnivores who eat fruit and berries, along with leaves and other shit, but will eat meat and have been known to prey on animals, yet it’s not their main source of food. They’re not apex predators but they aren’t actively prey.

        • squaresinger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          23 hours ago

          The same holds true for a lot of animals. There aren’t many purely “vegan” animals. A horse will snack a mouse too if it gets the opportunity.

          • exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            17 hours ago

            Plus evolutionary history shows plenty of examples of animals switching from pure carnivore to pure herbivore to omnivores in between, and back the other direction. All birds are descended from a common carnivorous ancestor, but plenty of birds today subsist mostly on seeds or fruit.

            If there is a lot of available biomass to be eaten, nature will find a way and some animal is going to fill that niche. Many of the folivores (herbivores specializing in digesting leaves) that descended from carnivores have to deal with the low nutrient/calorie density of their foods by just eating a lot of it, and have varying levels of microbial symbiosis for helping with that digestion.

          • Starski@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            Ah, I guess you are but you put it in a different place in your sentence compared to the comic, which confused me at first as it can be interpreted both ways with how you wrote it. Either way, the rest of my comment should still be relevant.

  • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Is it actually possible for a fish-like animal to have eyes at the front (i.e. an animal with a hydrodynamic shape that spends all its time underwater)?

    I feel like that’s really difficult for evolution to achieve, especially because the mouth has to go somewhere at the front too. I mean, look at where the lights of a high-speed train are placed and their shape.

    Intuitively it feels easier to just put the eyes on the side. Plus it feels like there’s a lower risk of damaging them when bumping into something.

  • mr_account@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    1 day ago

    Last time I saw this kind of comment/meme someone pointed out that dragons are usually depicted with eyes on the sides of their head. What hunts them, I wonder

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    It’s not the question if the eyes on the side or in the front, it’s about the capability to be able to focusing on a stereoscopic vision to be able to calculate the distances to the prey or not. Side eyes increase the field of vision, which can be advantageous for fleeing animals, but does not exclude that predators can also use it to strategically locate themselves better in the environment. But it is true that animals with frontal vision are generally predatory.

    Well…

    • Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      20 hours ago

      There are lots of reasons to have binocular frontal vision. Redundancy, differing info for optic flow, sensitivity, reducing the frontal blind spot, compensating for retinal blind spots, higher frontal resulution, seeing around things, depth perception…

      Most of there are good for predators, but predation isn’t the only reason to have them.

    • flora_explora@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      They also have to orient themselves in a truely 3D landscape, unlike terrestrial predators who hunt on basically a 2D plane. Birds of prey (with the exception of owls) also don’t have front-facing eyes, probably for similar reasons* (and they’re stereoscopic vision also works a bit different I think with very different points of focus).

      *see comments below

        • flora_explora@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          23 hours ago

          Haha, I’m not a bird person and didn’t bother to look it up. Thanks for the correction!

          Although they still don’t look fully front-facing like e.g. in cats, right?

          • Zerush@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            23 hours ago

            Well, better as front-faces, the capability to focus on a point in front, since a 3D vision is essential for a predator, to be able to accurately calculate distances. Insects and arthropods often combine side and frontal vision, if they are predators, obtaining a vision in practically 360º, for example dragonflies and also jumping spiders or hunters, these usually have two large eyes in front and 6 smaller side eyes. Chameleons solve this with eyes that can move independently, only focusing on the front before the attack. In small animals a wide field of vision is necessary, even if they are predators, since they themselves appear on the menu of others.

            • flora_explora@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              16 hours ago

              Hm, in small animals my previous point of a 2D vs 3D space is also valid. Large land prey animals “only” have to look from side to side to spot predators. Small animals have to look in all 3 dimensions, like sharks

  • zeca@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Being a predator is not a property, its a relation. X is a predator of Y… but not of Z, and is a prey of V and not of W.