No - because the do not count trains that either never started their journey, or that stopped midway through and turned around. It’s a really sorry trick to make the statistic look “better”.
“It’s not delayed, it just… Jever got there!”
Hm. Aber realistischer: Ich glaube, ich muss mich eigentlich zwingen, direkt nach der Arbeit laufen zu gehen. Erhöht die Chance dass ich es überhaupt mache, und danach ist der Kopf wesentlich freier für anderes.
Das glaub ich dir sofort.
Eigentlich müsste man umgekehrt machen, Erstmal morgens schön 6h Hobby, und dann 8h Arbeit Autopilot… 😄
Keine Ahnung. Ich arbeite von zuhause und fange recht früh an, bin jeden Tag spätestens um 16 Uhr fertig. Dann mach ich 2h irgendwas Hobby-relevantes.
Danach? Danach bin ich durch. Kochen noch, OK, und danach Couch. Wenn ich um 10 ins Bett gehe, hab ich auf dem Papier 6h Freizeit, aber mehr als 2h ist einfach nicht drin energietechnisch.
OK, so what you want is for other people to volunteer their time and money to keep an instance running. That, by itself, is honestly fine, and many people are happy to do so.
But you then also do not want to play by their rules. That part is not fine.
Just host your own instance.
Others are luckily always free to block you, but you do not need to worry about losing your account.
There is not really any downside to hosting your own instance either, thanks to federation, you get to participate in the wider Lemmy community as an equal member.
Sounds like you never wanted to be friends, just fuck them.
I’m almost sorry to be blunt, but…
Women don’t want to be chased. You’re a misogynist who has reduced women to “people to have sex with” in your own mind.
If you change that, you gain the possibility of actual connections, including intimacy, with them; if you don’t, you don’t. Either way it’s up to you if you want the status quo to continue or to improve.
Prisoner Of War:
That is actually a really interesting approach to moderation, huh.
…benutzt Wurzel-ebene Gegentäuschung. Damit hat eine Amerikanisch-Saudische Firma eine Wurzel-Werkzeugkiste auf deinem Rechner. Ich weiß ja nicht, wie begehrenswert das ist.
Wait, not the other way round? One tale per 70-min episode?
(With the priest’s tale getting an initial 1.5hrs opening episode? 👀)
Hah… Fair 😄 Hope you’ll get the chance!
Interesting - this is the first time I have seem someone (implicitly) dislike Villeneuve’s version (though to be fair, I have not closely followed the discourse around it). DO you have additional grievances, beyond the actors?
For myself: Dan Simmons’ Hyperion Cantos. I know that I will never be in a situation to do as the question above suggests (nor that I would have the knowledge or skills required), but I am currently re-reading the books (Hyperion, Fall of Hyperion, Endymion, Rise of Endymion), and I can’t stop thinking about a big screen adaptation.
Or rather, Simmons’ writing is so vivid, so vibrant that you can’t help but visualize it in a cinematic way before your inner eye anyways. The alien, but still somewhat familiar environments, the gargantuan forces of nature and expansive backgrounds just as much as the more intimate set pieces, cities, secret meeting rooms, and so on. “Every Frame a Painting” is something I’ve heard said about some movies, and these books are the textual equivalent: “Every page cannot be helped but be turned into a Painting”. The Hyperion Cantos isn’t even my favorite book or anything the like; it’s just something that screams for an adaptation IMO, and a beautiful one at that.
I also think that the story is exceptionally well suited for either a limited series (Hyperion & Fall of Hyperion) or a movie (Endymion, Rise of Endymion). In fact, I am convinced that if this had been made into a series back in the early/mid 2010s, it could have had a genre- and generation-defining impact akin to (the early seasons of…) Game of Thrones. Today… I’m not sure a studio would spend the required amount of money to make this good.
(Also yes I made this post simply because I had nowhere else to put this comment.)
What’s a tomato?
Because a commit should be an “indivisible” unit, in the sense that “should this be a separate commit?” equates to “would I ever want to revert just these changes?”.
IDK about your commit histories, but if I’d leave everything in there, there’d be a ton of fixup commits just fixing spelling, satisfying the linter,…
Also, changes requested by reviewers: those fixups almost always belong to the same commit, it makes no sense for them to be separate.
And finally, I guess you do technically give up some granularity, but you gain an immense amount of readability of your commit history.
Probably this: https://マリウス.com/a-word-on-omarchy/#summary