• Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The article says they take the age of your account into factor. You should read it.

      • kieron115@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I just don’t believe them. They will find a way to screw it up with AI, the same way they’ve screwed up youtube moderation.

        • Psythik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          The article also states that this system of age verification is already in place. Have you been asked to provide ID yet? No? Then you’re fine.

          Again, you should read the article.

          • kieron115@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 hours ago

            YouTube uses a pretty wide variety of signals from across your Google account, including the age of your account, the types of searches you’re making, the types of videos you’re watching, and which apps you’ve downloaded, to make this estimation.

            Account age is one factor that will be considered. Who’s to say their AI won’t screw up weights for the other factors and decide that someone is a child because they primarily let their kids use their account (bad practice, but not unheard of from stressed parents)? What happens when you aren’t a youtuber with an audience that can get the attention of actual human beings?

            Google has already made AI-related errors with moderating youtube. I will trust what they say after it’s been proven.

            https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/10/youtube-denies-ai-was-involved-with-odd-removals-of-tech-tutorials/

  • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Just curious why is this entire thing even in the Android community? This is a privacy topic or a YouTube topic etc. There’s nothing about it that ties it to Android. Can we keep stuff like this out? It’s just one more topic that devolves into politics, scare speculation etc. Just read the comment threads if you need to see.

      • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Hard to escape Google unless you are willing to use a custom rom which is getting harder and harder to do with devices with unlockable bootloaders becoming rarer. Google also has a pretty big influence on the direction of Android.

        Even GrapheneOS that is talked of often requires purchase of a Google phone.

        • Uri@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I myself have degoogled android device without bootloader locked. I have multiple devices with stock and custom ROM. With adb or other GUI tools you can go 95% degoogled without causing any breakage

          • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            But, it not being 100% does show how Google is not Android is hard to make a reality for locked bootloaders and the influence it also can have on unlocked phones.

            A phone having an unlockable bootloader doesn’t guarantee being able to flash a custom rom from one of the more trusted groups.

            Sometimes it means having to rely on the work of one unknown person trying to port it over for the device, and not knowing if they snuck anything malicious.

            Its just a really poor situation compared to desktop OS options that makes it hard to degoogle and also be secure. Since being more private from data collection and being secure can be different things. Right GrapheneOS is one of the few options that tries to offer both privacy without comprising on security.

            • Uri@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              41 minutes ago

              Situation on mobile devices is worse than people think. These vendors are locking devices more everyday. We seriously need more than 2 mobile OS. Linux phone’s future is still unclear

        • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Maybe it’s my preference of using older mid-range devices but unlocking the bootloader has been fine, the problem is some banking apps and inferior hardware drivers (worse wireless performance, stretched camera image, no control of flashlight brightness etc.)

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 hours ago

        when over half of the bug fixes and security patches come from Google, it’s a Google product.

        and I’m saying that as an android user from /e/OS

        • Uri@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Thats a google product but google apps and android are two diffrent product or atleast should be

          • tempest@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            Should be but at this point basically aren’t.

            You can’t run AOSP on most phones and if you could you wouldn’t get the user experience most people expect from a phone.

  • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Well, duh. I don’t spend much time on youtube, what is there worth watching? Not much.

    So can I do without looking up some nostalgic crap from the past? Yeah I could live without it.

    I am finding out now, as youtube keeps demanding that I sign in. Fuck off, aint nothing worth that.

    • Oascany@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      This is a strange opinion, YouTube has an insane amount of content for just about everyone. There’s so many fantastic creators and it has just about the best edutainment content anywhere. Terribly managed and the platform itself sucks, but there’s an incredible amount of amazing content on there for free.

      • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I am not sure I need “content” in my life. I can waste time in a lots of ways. I always found myself thinking what am I getting out of this really?

        Also, there is just so much on it, where would one even begin? I miss youtube when it started out, now that people make things for money, the idea is to just stretch things out and waste time. Like and Subscribe!

        I made it a point to never subscribe to anything unless it was anonymous through a third party tool.

        So, what do you think is actually “fantastic” on youtube?

        • Oascany@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Hey I don’t think anyone really needs content - it’s just something we like. As for what I like on there: Joe Scott, Andrew Huang, Ahoy, Philosophy Tube, Drew Gooden, Comicstorian, Drawfee, Hagerty, Engineering Explained, Throttle House, Tier Zoo, Foureyes Furniture, FUNKe, HiTop Films, In The Mix, Noodle, Internet Shaquille, LEMMiNO, Michael Reeves, MrMobile, Nakey Jakey, ReDriven, Not Just Bikes, Sarah-n-Tuned and I’m kinda tired of more names. But each of these is one of my great top tiers, and it’s so awesome that there’s this many (and more) people on there making great content. It’s okay to not want to engage in that though, I do get that.

        • Xell22@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I go for the science communicators. Not only are the good ones super educational and entertaining, but you also don’t even need to watch to gain from it. Just listen. I weld 45+ hours a week. Being able to throw on a 3 hour video on whatever I’m interested in that day is great :) but to each their own of course ^^. For my part I’ll enjoy it until it’s unbearable.

          • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I hear you about listening to stuff. I have a collection of podcasts to listen to and thinking about all the things I have learned over the years, its amazing.

            There is so much to choose from.

  • gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    There’s really 4 5 spaces in the main internet:

    • the public corporate web (YouTube, Facebook, twitter, Reddit, etc)
    • the private corporate web (requires login to view any content, Software as a Service, Cloud Apps, etc)
    • the public web (Wikimedia, Wikia, Archive.org)
    • the indie web / small web
    • private web - inaccessible except through login or through VPN or TOR/Onion, but not corporate (media servers, email servers, darkweb, file servers)

    And currently the main issue is that the corporate web is intentionally trying to strangle the other spaces on the web.

    But there are some movements against it, https://indieweb.org/ and https://neocities.com/ and https://smallweb.cc/

    Edit: missed one of the spaces

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I have Tuta, it’s good enough. Lots of storage for the price compared with others.

  • Teppichbrand@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I’m slowly making peace with the thought of losing the internet as it is. Maybe it’ll become something broken you wade into from time to time, some sort of blinking, blabbering wasteland to scavenge valid, valuable information from and return to your oasis. Some people will stay trapped in there forever, but it’s useless to try to communicate with them.

  • quick_snail@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    18 hours ago

    That’s what I said about my IP. Now I can’t watch YouTube. I mostly just use PeerTube

      • Uri@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        For me there are actually some people making videos I like. For example thelinuxexperiment, Veronica explain, privacy guides yeah not much though

      • quick_snail@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Oh, me? I do more posting than viewing, honestly. If we all do the same, it solves this concern

      • 𝕨𝕒𝕤𝕒𝕓𝕚@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        If you mostly care about tech and especially Linux and Open Source there is some good content there. Other than that, good content is unfortunately few and far between.

      • krooklochurm@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I don’t understand what you do on YouTube.

        I don’t enjoy it. I’ve never enjoyed it. I truly don’t understand how people can spend time watching it

        • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          You dont understand how people dont like infinite video content? I guess you also dont understand why people enjoy libraries too.

  • Hirom@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Gotta support alternatives such as Peertube, Nebula… so there are nice places to find videos as YouTube becomes worse and worse.

    • ruan@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      17 hours ago

      It’s almost impossible for any of those to suceed beyond being niche because its not viable to run against the economics of scale and the practicality of the corporate solutions provided by the Big Techs companies in capitalist countries.

      Believe me, I’ve tried to talk to real people about the dangers of sending data to a single company like Google (Alphabet) or Facebook (Meta) and depending on that for media comsumption, how it can and how it’s really used to manipulate public opinion on countries… The fact is that for non-tech and non-privacy minded people (which I’d sure Must be 99.9% of the population) they really don’t seem to care, they just wanna a “free” service that they turn on the TV and there are the videos of their “influencers” or YouTube channels to watch, on YouTube I really hate how it shoves ads like there’s no tomorrow nowadays every 5 minutes, but I also understand there’s a cost to run their business, I, myself, if were to pay for similar service provided without ads I’d pretty sure the YouTube Premium offering would still being a bargain since Google’s infractucture and running costs are really optimized.

      So yeah, I really don’t believe any capitalist country can compete with the Big Techs companies, they are probably deeply rooted into common user behavior in all capitalist country, in the capitalist “democracies” it’s impossible to lobby against them in privacy concerns since they can easily sway public opinion in their favor with invisible chances to their content delivery, so anyone trying would have to have a lot of resources to do so (a popular movement without money funding in a capitalist society is basically doomed, theres a very pow chance to suceed imo) and any national alternative, or any actual alternative to their services is almost impossible to suceed since they already have their economy of scale set up with minimal costs and they can also run years on and on with a loss untill any competition does due to being unable to compete with their lower artificial prices.

      • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I don’t know how or why you see ads on YouTube. I have been using firefox and before that whatever else, for a very long time. I have not seen an ad of any kind on YouTube in many MANY years. And since sponsor block came out I’ve only seen a few that managed to slip through. I just fast forward. But why would anyone suffer YouTube with ads? You’re volunteering for it at this point because it’s insanely easy to block them.

  • brax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Imagine YouTube telling you to submit ID to prove that your 20 year old account is 18+ lmao

    Also, imagine living in a country pretending that it’s amazing while they treat their citizens like they do… United States of North Korea vibes

      • Lurking Hobbyist🕸️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Grayjay and Newpipe (and its forks) can do that, as well as just watching it like regular youtube, but also the option to select from other platforms - like peertube, as one example - to watch.

        • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I use FreeTube, but this doesn’t seem like a “youtube piracy” solution because it is streaming the content directly from youtube, which can ultimately prevent access; I already am blocked from watching certain videos that require you to be logged in to watch.

          The problem is basically, if there is a specific youtube video you want to watch, but youtube insists that you must provide ID to see it, right now I don’t think there’s actually a lot of recourse for that because there are too many such videos for anyone else to actually host them or offer torrents or anything.

  • ook@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    Youtube/Google/Alphabet out of aaaaall the companies out there, should already have a mindblowing amount of info on 99% of its users. There’s no need at all to even ask for ID.

    • arin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      They want solid evidence for authorities, remember USA has gone full Nazi from the very top all the way down

  • RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    135
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Between the age of my account and the fact I pay for premium, if they ever ask for ID they can go fuck themselves and I’ll go back to as blockers and fresh accounts

      • cole@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        52
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        1 day ago

        nothing wrong with that.

        you support the people you watch without having to see ads. also, comes with YT music.

        it’s a pretty good deal

        • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          But then you end up giving Google even more information compared to using it logged out.

            • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              20 hours ago

              It also monetarily feed into the youtube network effect of there being no other viable options. Maybe youtube becoming completely unprofitable for creators is a necessary evil so there becomes less and less incentive to put content there.

              • cole@lemdro.id
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 hours ago

                I mean yeah if everyone would coordinate. We’re such a small minority on here it doesn’t really do anything on its own. If we got the creators themselves onboard…

            • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              Yeah, but having a Google account, tying payment to it, and having viewing history all tied to it is even worse. There’s a reason Microsoft wants people to use an account on their OS is tying stuff like extended support to it because a dedicated profile is still more reliable and accurate than trying to rely solely on finger printing.

              One is so good you don’t even need to try to finger print because you already did all the work for them logging in.

              • PurpleClouds@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                I agree. All I am saying that in the limit where we all use services that respect privacy and stay away from big tech, we still have a major issue that we currently don’t have a solution for and is very hard to avoid or eliminate completely.

                • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 hours ago

                  Yeah, but taking approach of its all pointless just give in isn’t good either.

                  Not paying and not using an account is ways to reduce how much is given to those companies.

        • no banana@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          And the paying user average revenue for creators is higher than ad users. At least it was when I last looked.

          • Lucy :3@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Tipping your creators 5€/month or smth is even better. No google, Amazon in between, no charges…

            • cole@lemdro.id
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              23 hours ago

              yeah except if I watch a random video from somebody they wouldn’t get any money with this method.

              I can’t afford to give everyone 5€ per month

      • RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I mean, people pay for Netflix or Amazon or whatever, why is YouTube different? It’s my primary video platform and I watch more than 50 hours a week (I’m low balling that number to hell as well).

        While paying is more convenient for me than breaking their shit, I’ll pay. Also means creators actually get paid for my views as well

    • Steve@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I still have the original Google Play Music All Access intro deal of $7.99/month from 2013.
      They contractually can’t raise the price on me ever. 12 years so far.

      • otacon239@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I couldn’t keep paying for it in good conscience when they killed the original Play Music app and along with it: their awesome selection of curated playlists, the best library organization I’ve seen before or since, and the critical one, the ability to upload your own music that wasn’t available already. I just can’t stand YouTube as a music organization platform.

        Edit: Oh! And not to mention the I’m Feeling Lucky button that somehow no one else has managed to replicate.

        • Steve@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          That’s how much I pay for YouTube Premium.

          I also buy CDs, or Bandcamp downloads directly for those I really like, and want to donate to.
          I “curate” whole discographies of stuff that I want to “archive”.
          But when someone recommends music I haven’t heard of, I load up their most popular stuff on YouTube Music and listen to a bunch there, ad free. Then decide if or how I obtain more.

  • winni@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I alredy quit youtube when commercial crap hit the fan. Never used Zuckerbergs surveillance anyway. Very happy to spend more time on my real life

      • That Weird Vegan she/her@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        19 hours ago

        protip: if you wish to watch on your android TV, get an app called smarttube next. You’ll need to side load it (so i don’t know if it will work much longer with this shit that google is up to. don’t know if their block on sideloading affects android tv), but once it is installed, it auto updates and shit. no more adverts on youtube.

        • nickiwest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Smarttube is amazing.

          It’s a little buggy sometimes, but I assume that’s because Google is trying to keep other front ends from bypassing their ads. Smarttube gets regular updates, so it’s never a problem for long.

        • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          The good news is Google seems to have completely forgotten about Android TV so they probably won’t tamper with it or if they do there won’t be any compelling reasons to upgrade