• plyth@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    wouldn’t you have to blame China for bolstering the US military instead?

    Yes, but that was not the point. Germany has done it for decades, so having to live with tariffs and LNG imports doesn’t change much.

    Because observing individual examples doesn’t allow for deducing that it applies to all.

    Right in theory but not in practice.

    Why don’t you allow it to develop?

    I do. Let’s hope it is as successful as the various emancipation movements.

    • Quittenbrot@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yes, but that was not the point.

      :D I can imagine! Let’s face it: if that really was a kind of super hack for the US to get their dominating military, their biggest rival wouldn’t be one of the biggest partakers in it since their adoption of market economy in the 80s.

      Right in theory but not in practice.

      Absolutely right in practice. Giving in to a simplified world view based on individual events is always a dumb idea. Be it that individual criminal offences by foreigners don’t constitute a general criminality of foreigners or, like in this case, assuming that the US effectively controls our politics.

      • plyth@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        their biggest rival wouldn’t be one of the biggest partakers

        It has worked out for them, hasn’t it? It’s all about capturing the production processes. The US now has to contain them to come out ahead.

        based on individual events

        The individual part is important. Foreigners are individuals, US foreign policy isn’t.

        • Quittenbrot@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          It has worked out for them, hasn’t it?

          How? According to your theory, they have been heavily bolstering the US military for decades. At least that’s what you want to blame Germany with, but somehow for China the same would be a win?

          US foreign policy isn’t.

          So you want to extrapolate that because Trump is trying to save Milei with money, the US is effectively controlling us all?

          • plyth@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            blame Germany

            Why blame? It also was a partial win for Germany, but we deliberately forfeited on building the fourth reich so we don’t have that concentration of power.

            want to extrapolate

            Why do you want Europe to be independend if there is no control?

            Milei is just the most recent incident that is out in the open.

              • plyth@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                You argue that the EU has to be strong to avoid being influenced by the US. At the same time you doubt that the EU is influenced by the US.

                • Quittenbrot@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  At the same time you doubt that the EU is influenced by the US.

                  I doubt that the EU is controlled by the US. Of course there’s influence and attempts to control us.