skepller@lemmy.world to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 2 months agoChina Is Joining Russia’s Shadow War on Europewww.bloomberg.comexternal-linkmessage-square63fedilinkarrow-up177arrow-down14file-text
arrow-up173arrow-down1external-linkChina Is Joining Russia’s Shadow War on Europewww.bloomberg.comskepller@lemmy.world to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square63fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareplyth@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoThe book contains facts about how people think about the war.
minus-squareQuittenbrot@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoAnd which of these facts do you want to point out by citing the book?
minus-squareplyth@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoNot one in particular but the overall approach.
minus-squareQuittenbrot@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoEarlier in this thread, you said “it’s already annoying to know the summary.” What annoys you in this “very functional” book you haven’t read?
minus-squareplyth@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoThe discrepancy between how the book and the media analyses the situation.
minus-squareplyth@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoRead the page and you will know.
The book contains facts about how people think about the war.
And which of these facts do you want to point out by citing the book?
Not one in particular but the overall approach.
Namely?
That it’s very functional.
Earlier in this thread, you said “it’s already annoying to know the summary.”
What annoys you in this “very functional” book you haven’t read?
The discrepancy between how the book and the media analyses the situation.
What exactly?
Read the page and you will know.