• Bob@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The author claims that Norway is the only Nordic country that isn’t in the EU. This is false. Iceland might be small, but it’s still a country.

    In the current economic climate an EU membership seems appealing, but I’m not sure it’s the right choice in the medium-term. Norway has a very different, natural-resource heavy economy than the rest of the EU, and monetary policy would not alway align. I also think it’s important to try to maintain control over fisheries to a larger degree than the EU allows, and I already think the country is making too many concessions in this area.

    Like a lot of European countries, Norway is a member of NATO. Even though the US can’t be relied upon anymore, I would still consider it a more credible defensive alliance than the EU. That’s why Finland and Sweden joined last year.

    The author says that “…the EU [is] the only organisation for collective European agency in world affairs, and there is safety in numbers.” But the EU does not agree on anything. A third of the European parliament consists of Eurosceptics, and because of internal disagreements between member states, any shared foreign policy ends up completely milquetoast.

    • comrade_twisty@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      In the long term it might be worth it to reform the EU in a way that will allow Norway, Iceland and Switzerland to join and open up a path for the UK to come back.

      • CAVOK@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        24 hours ago

        The EU is always changing. The EU of today isn’t the same as the one the UK left, or the EU that was formed by the Maastricht treaty.

        Might not always change in the way some people wish, but the change is constant.