E: apparently it needs to be said that I am not suggesting you switch to Linux on your phone today; just that development needs to accelerate.

Android has always been a fairly open platform, especially if you were deliberate about getting it that way, but we’ve seen in recent months an extremely rapid devolution of the Android ecosystem:

  1. The closing of development of an increasing number of components in AOSP.
  2. Samsung, Xiaomi and OnePlus have removed the option of bootloader unlocking on all of their devices. I suspect Google is not far behind.
  3. Google implementing Play Integrity API and encouraging developers to implement it. Notably the EU’s own identity verification wallet requires this, in stark contrast to their own laws and policies, despite the protest of hundreds on Github.
  4. And finally, the mandatory implementation of developer verification across Android systems. Yes, if you’re running a 3rd-party OS like GOS you won’t be directly affected by this, but it will impact 99.9% of devices, and I foresee many open source developers just opting out of developing apps for Android entirely as a result. We’ve already seen SyncThing simply discontinue development for this reason, citing issues with Google Play Store. They’ve also repeatedly denied updates for NextCloud with no explanation, only restoring it after mass outcry. And we’ve already seen Google targeting any software intended to circumvent ads, labeling them in the system as “dangerous” and “untrusted”. This will most certainly carry into their new “verification” system.

Google once competed with Apple for customers. But in a world where Google walks away from the biggest antitrust trial since 1998 with yet another slap on the wrist, competition is dead, and Google is taking notes from Apple about what they can legally get away with.

Android as we know it is dead. And/or will be dead very soon. We need an open replacement.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 hour ago

    At this point, the “best” solution might be buying one of those SBC (single board computers) that also has an android image, like orangePi or ODroid and “build” the rest of the phone on top of it. Might be the only way people can get a screen smaller than 6" as well. I say Android in this case because it has access to all the apps without needing emulation or Waydroid

    OOOOORRRRR, just buy an used older phone that you know is easy to unlock and install a custom rom. Did that with a motorola G6, am happy with lineage. Not the fastest phone by a long shot, especially as newer versions of many apps just introduce more bloat because fuck you, but perfectly usable for messaging and video watching. Also has a headphone jack!

  • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    54 minutes ago

    Ill address your issues with Android and then ill give my issues with mobile Linux:

    1
    1. The closing of development of an increasing number of components in AOSP.

    Yeah this is bad but not even devastating for custom roms like GOS or LineageOS

    2
    1. Samsung, Xiaomi and OnePlus have removed the option of bootloader unlocking on all of their devices. I suspect Google is not far behind.

    I highly doubt Google would lock the bootloader, they still make the most friendly devices for custom roms (yes even after all they have done). Also Samsung hasnt acturally allowed custom roms for a while now while Xiaomi doesn’t either.

    3
    1. Google implementing Play Integrity API and encouraging developers to implement it. Notably the EU’s own identity verification wallet requires this, in stark contrast to their own laws and policies, despite the protest of hundreds on Github.

    Even if a developer used the Play Integrity API it doesn’t mean custom roms or other operating systems like GOS arent supported. I use GOS and have had no issues with play integrity, there are no incentives to require a certified Android device.

    4
    1. And finally, the mandatory implementation of developer verification across Android systems. Yes, if you’re running a 3rd-party OS like GOS you won’t be directly affected by this, but it will impact 99.9% of devices, and I foresee many open source developers just opting out of developing apps for Android entirely as a result.

    Sideloading isnt going anywhere and tbh I doubt this will be strongly enforced, Google will always have the threat of root resurfacing. You dont even need root to get rid of Google Play services and install MicroG.

    Conclusion

    Android as we know it is dead. And/or will be dead very soon. We need an open replacement.

    That seems highly unlikely, even with everything Google has done the fact is AOSP is the only mature open source mobile project.

    Now ill get to my issues with mobile Linux:

    Hardware

    As of now there is no good hardware and no plans by any company to make good hardware in the future.

    UI

    Mobile Linux interfaces are at least a decade behind Android, clunky and bearly usable. Btw yes I have tried them recently, they suck. For the most part mobile Linux interfaces are made by developers who would never acturally daily drive them.

    Software support

    Not a lot of Linux software supports arm and those that do either don’t work with touchscreens or have them as an afterthought.

    UX

    The software that does work generals isnt designed with small screens in mind and are very often scaled down desktop apps

    Basic functionality

    Basic functionality is absolutely not there on Linux phones, things like calling and texing either require commands or outright dont work at all. For example according to the Postmarketos Wiki in order to change volume on a Pixel 3a during a call you need to manually change it with commands. Genuenly what the fuck, if im on an important call the other person isnt going to wait several hours for me to fiddle with the terminal. If I need to send a text now im not waiting several hours until it works.

    Security

    Mobile Linux has all the security issues as Linux with no mitigations, except phones contain a lot more personal information and are more likley to be a target for data extraction.

  • bonus_crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Is identity verification for publishing android apps that bad? Both the app store and play store already have your billing information since you have to pay to publish an app anyway right?

  • TheLazyNerd@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I just bought the Fairphone 6 with /e/os. I am pleasantly surprised with how many apps work just fine.

  • mr_right@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    indeed, android has been a shit show for the last couple of months and its not looking good.

    i was thinking that this will make rooting and by extension custom ROMs prevalent again which hopefully will take us back to the golden age of android modding, but be careful of what you wish for.

    I DON’T WANNA USE STOCK ANDROID. DON’T WANNA DON’T WANNA DON’T WANNA DON’T WANNA DON’T WANNA DON’T WANNA

  • Tydragon@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Check out postmarketOS, a real Linux distro for phones with a 10-year life cycle goal and mainline kernel support. It’s not daily-driver ready for everyone, but it frees you from Google and OEM lockdowns. If we want an open mobile future, this is the project worth supporting.

  • AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    While I support the continued progress of real Linux phones, have a Pinephone, and even wasted all of yesterday trying to make a working build of Armbian for retro handheld I have; I think it’s more practical to focus on open Android distributions, getting more phones out that can support multi os’s and buying those, and growing a robust app market system that can compete with Google Play.

    F-Droid is almost there, but being open-source doesn’t mean something has to be free of charge. F-Droid should be extended, or possibly an additional app manager be established, that still promotes software freedom and privacy, but allows for devs to charge for their apps as well.

  • wowwoweowza@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I’m about a tech zero skill but I am at Lemmy for THIS news. Thank you for resisting complete shitification hegemony. Resist!

  • mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I just hope that this time we go Free Software and not committing the mistake of going Open Source for a 3rd time (BSD/UNIX AT&T; Android/Google). Unless we want to fall with the same stone yet once more.

    Android going Open Source allowed Google to close Android once it got mature. It’s a Trojan Horse, yet people still go Open Source and then complain when some company closes their source.

  • youmaynotknow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 hours ago

    By the way, outside of our brawl down below, I do agree with you 100% that having a fully functional and modern Linux phone would be an amazing thing to have.

  • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I’ll switch away from Android when there’s a good alternative, but I’m not very technical and need something with a nice GUI and an easy installation process. Hopefully Linux will offer something like that someday, but I don’t think it’s there yet.

  • viewports@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    It would be cool to see people move beyond the standard smartphone and into some sort of hotspot and linux based palmtop or umpc like setup

    I had something like that in the early 2000s with a nokia n800 and it worked well enough I’m sure it would be even better now

  • glitching@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    the vast majority of commenters here either have no direct experience with a Linux phone or have seen some shallow youtube “review” of a dude swiping the same two screens left/right and extrapolate a buncha shit that has no contact with reality.

    presently, and in the foreseeable future, linux phones aren’t an android alternative, they are just linux on the phone, i.e. they allow you to do linux shit on a handheld device.

    like, the bleeding edge version of any variant (plasma mobile, gnome, phosh) isn’t even close to an Android phone from like 2015, let alone a modern one.

    and that’s before we touch on the pillars of mobile tech like fluidity, battery efficiency, reliability, etc., none of those things are even in a remotely passable state, not to mention - using the thing to make calls. you are better off forgetting about the camera, as well.

    and the reason is simple, not only is there a gargantuan discrepancy between evil corp’s resources and the predominantly unpaid enthusiasts, each dev team’s reimplementing shit that’s already solved on another platform. apple doesn’t have to do that. google as well.

    then there’s the idea that the javascript-backed Gnome - that has issues running fluidly on super-capable hardware - is the basis on a low-power device on which the linux mobile phone experience is built. reinventing solved shit, but in a stupid way - THREE FINGER swipe on a phone, really?

    although there’s a solid app base, the apps that are supposedly mobile friendly are few and far between, most are just downright unusable on a vertical screen and dog help you if launch an electron app. firefox, even with pmOS patches (useless without) is tiresome to use. you can forget about dating, ubering, banking, or even just using a messenger everybody else does.

    if you’re squeamish about flashing custom recoveries and ROMs, the e.g. pmOS install process is way, way, way more involved and failure prone. if you go with ubuntu touch or mobian, even more so.

    finally, if you’re talking about a device that you’ve grown accustomed to to the extent that you’re using it subconsciously, swiping and multitasking and such whilst walking and dodging other pedestrians - no such thing exists over here.

    I’m just tying this up because I keep reading about “switching”, people are either delusional or misinformed, there’s nothing (yet) to switch to.

    get a couple of $50 ex-flaghips to play with, flash lineageOS on one and pmOS on the other and that should hold you over for a coupla years.

    • Piece_Maker@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      if you’re squeamish about flashing custom recoveries and ROMs, the e.g. pmOS install process is way, way, way more involved and failure prone. if you go with ubuntu touch or mobian, even more so.

      What?? PmOS and Ubuntu Touch both have very easy, foolproof installers. No idea about Mobian to be fair.

      I’ve been using only Linux-based mobile OS’s since my first smartphone, and while you’re right for a lot of the new breed made for the Pinephone and Librem, Sailfish OS and Ubuntu Touch are both perfectly useable for lots of people. Both have a decent app ecosystem and both support running Android apps to fill in the gaps (I’ve used both, the proprietary Jolla one is about as good as it gets and is practically seamless for like 99% of Android apps).

      Of course there’s going to be people who will respond to me to say they can’t possibly switch because of that one app that they and 5 other people in the world use, as though they’re in any way relevant to what I’ve said. Just the same as when I post about people switching to Linux on the desktop and there’s always that one Fusion 360 user who thinks everyone in the world also uses Fusion and so Linux can’t possibly ever work for anyone.

    • Ulrich@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 hours ago

      apparently it needs to be said that I am not suggesting you switch to Linux on your phone today; just that development needs to accelerate.

      • glitching@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I’m not critiquing your post, I’m just clarifying to a buncha people who think otherwise that it’s not an option.

        as to “it needs to accelerate”, I have a grim outlook. the only way it’s gonna do that is if there significant cash behind it and if everything non-essential is to be trimmed so that a functional platform can emerge. in our ever-enshittifying, greater-fool-theory investment climate, it’s doubtful there loose capital with such an agenda, and I doubt such a thing is even on the horizon.

        same way with “desktop linux”; like, can you image where we’d be if every development effort is geared towards just one DE/WM, instead of tons of duplicated efforts and abandoned paths? yeah, good things eventually emerge from all the disjointed chaos, but eventually. and our joint assessment is that we’re running outta time for the “eventual” part.

        • Ulrich@feddit.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 hours ago

          It’s not great but lots of people are using it today. There are multiple entire businesses built on it. It may not fit your needs but it obviously does for many. And it’s only going to get better.

          • glitching@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            see, this is the thing I’m talking about. your comment indicates that it’s possibly a viable alternative to OS developed by the wealthiest corps in the world, for 15+ years and people are like “ok, there’s options”…

            it is nowhere near that. it’s linux on a mobile device, and that’s such a humongously, vastly different thing than an alternative and that should be the first and foremost thing said. same with the “android is linux” bozos in every thread (it really, really isn’t) who are not helping the issue, at all.

            and then we can dwell on whether it’s usable or not in its present state.

        • currycourier@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Eh, for desktop I’d say we’re just about there now. For people who don’t use their computers for much more than gaming and web browsing Bazzite works pretty great. Helped a friend who doesn’t do much more than that build a PC and install an OS and they seem to be doing fine with it, no complaints so far.

    • FosterMolasses@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Thank you. I get what OP is saying, but in general I’m so over the constant blind Linux fanboy hype train, like it’s the solution to everything. One of the reasons I can’t really stand to be on this instance unless I see something important enough to hit the front page. I’ll take a remotely functional windows dist with customized features over pretty much any linux OS anyday in order to not struggle to complete the most basic, essential tasks.

      Life’s too short to spend glued to Stackexchange instead of actually getting shit done.

      • Yaky@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Osmin on PinePhone was… Tolerable. I’m just pleasantly surprised it worked okay with GPS being integrated into the modem.

        Takes a long time to get a GPS fix (like old standalone GPS units), but it’s possible to provide A-GPS data to it.

    • Flipper@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      There is always the option of waydroid to get android apps running on Linux. It’s not a great solution, but a first stopgap measure to use services only available as apps.

      • glitching@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        14 hours ago

        that’s not a thing, presently. the OS has trouble running on its own and handling “native” apps, let alone introducing an emulation to the mix.

        of course, it can and does work to some extent - but not one where you depend on it, like you do with modern phones.