• thespawnkiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    7 days ago

    I feel like this is the new normal cycle of every software company. Once they become a leader, it’s never enough. It replicates the rise of billionaires. Just as the billionaires being rich beyond anything they and all of their succeeding generations could ever spend is not enough, being the industry leader and producing an amazing product that people want is somehow not enough. It always turns to control and power.

  • Bongles@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    I’m bothered that big companies, especially tech right now, no longer see their customers as people they need to please to stay in business, but instead as something they’ll inconvenience and squeeze as much as they can possibly get away with.

    They all got to where they are making, at one point, amazing products. Now? Fuck making windows useful, we can throw ads and AI at you every place we can think of. Fuck all of the parts of Android that made it stand out, we tell you what to install. You don’t want all of your data scraped and sold? Fuck you, there’s 3 of us and we’re all doing it. In fact we’ll never stop finding new ways to harvest data.

    Phones have basically stagnated entirely in the US. Sure you get moderately better chipsets, but what else? AI? I haven’t had a phone struggle with anything in… maybe 10 years. Instead features that people didn’t use enough just get removed.

  • humanoidchaos@lemmy.cif.su
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    7 days ago

    I came here specifically to ask about alternatives to Android now that google is becoming too abusive in the relationship.

  • TwinTitans@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    As shitty as M$ is, it would have been nice to see Windows phone become moderately successful and be a third primary mobile os.

  • thedruid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    7 days ago

    Fuck them. I have a guitar a pocket watch and a wind uo radio. Everything have is a nicety.

  • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    311
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    The infuriating part of the Google enshittification process is that there is nothing the user can do about it.

    Literally the only thing that motivates Google is profit. Controlling side-loaded apps will almost certainly boost their profits by a infinitesimal fraction of a percent, therefore it will be done. Even if consumer uproar causes Google to back down in the short term, they’ll simply implement this a few months later. Late-stage Capitalism sucks.

    • blitzen@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      165
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      You can stop using all Google products. Now I understand their market share on the web means they’re going to continue to shape the web.

      But make no mistake. There is something, however small, that you can do. De-Google.

      • dreugeworst@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        if I don’t use android or iOS, I can’t use my banking apps, pay with my phone, access government services as they require an app to sign in, etc. it’s just not doable anymore for me

        • blitzen@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Ignoring the fact that iOS is an option, I bet you’re mostly mistaken and there is a web based or non app option for everything, even if it’s not obvious.

      • seralth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        The only people who can de google are basically single shut ins with a job that doesnt use anything google.

        If you have kids or a company that uses google products. It’s a bad fucking joke to talk like it’s even a realistic option.

        Google is basically shoved down your throat. In most cases by the law literally. Seriously FUCK how tied the public education system is to google now.

      • gdog05@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        68
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        I will help hand hold anyone who wants to build servers or services (to the best of my ability) to replace Google services with their own.

        • blitzen@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          8 days ago

          There are a lot of alternatives out there. What service or services are you stuck on?

          • frank@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            26
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            For me, MitID in Denmark. 100% required for society and life here, requires Google Play Services now :(

            I tried e/os on my Fairphone for a bit. I think I could make it all work okay enough besides that. I should write people at the government or something I guess?

            • deczzz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 days ago

              Also, only officially browser for MitID is fucking Chrome. Always works with Firefox or libreWolf, though. However, I have contacted MitID two times about issues. They are always referring that I should look at the help page supported OS/browser blah blah. They don’t care about the part of the population that doesn’t use Chrome. Ironic that the same government now screams and shouts about how we have become too reliant on US big tech… Idiotic tech noob politicians.

            • Zombie@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              22
              ·
              8 days ago

              Yes! Being active politically is always important.

              Be civil and polite at first, you want these people on your side after all. But don’t be afraid to hold back if they respond with bullshit either. They are your representative, make them represent you and hold them to account if required.

              Encouraging friends and family to write is usually a good idea too.

              Not being politically engaged, I feel, is one of the main reasons for the downfall of democracy throughout the globe. Too many people think ticking a box every 4-5 years is all they need to do.

              • frank@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 days ago

                A good bit harder since I’m not a native Dane. In some more years when I’m a full fledged citizen I can start in earnest, but I’ll ask now at least

                • alfert@feddit.dk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 days ago

                  Jeg tror det er gratis

                  Edit:

                  Jeg var lige inde og kigge på MitID hjemmesiden. De skriver selv at der ikke var noget problem uden play integrity. Men at de implementerede det alligevel:

                  Therefore, an integrity check is now being introduced to ensure that the MitID app is downloaded from the certificed Google Play or Apple App Store, and to check whether Google or Apple consider the phone the app is running on to be compromised or not. This is happening even though there are no known cases of fraud with fake MitID apps.

                  https://www.mitid.dk/en-gb/about-mitid/news/mitid-gets-an-extra-anti-fraud-mechanism/

            • gdog05@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              I don’t know myself, but Graphene OS (on Google Pixel phones) has a pretty impressive sandbox layer for the play store and the apps it installs. It might be worth looking into if you’re not aware of it currently. (But if you’re aware of the Fairphone, I’m guessing you probably know about Graphene).

              • Diurnambule@jlai.lu
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                On graphene the release of the integrity API broke most of my gvt applications. I will have to buy a cheap android phone to be able to fill my taxes… I contacted them, they told me it is for security, I argued but it is useless. I have to buy an android phone or be punished for not filling my taxes. Amazing

              • frank@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                8 days ago

                I do, but as far as I was aware my Fairphone can’t run Graphene? I would love to keep using my Fairphone over buying Google’s hardware at this point

                • SecretSauces@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Then buy second-hand. You aren’t giving Google any of your money, and you can focus on increasing your privacy.

                • gdog05@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  You are correct, Graphene only runs on Pixel phones. I know there’s a few open mobile OS options out there but I’ve not spent any time researching them. There is a very good chance if you absolutely need an identification, then you can’t get away from Android. Hopefully someone else sees your comment and has an answer.

            • blitzen@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              8 days ago

              I’ve never heard of that, so I looked it up. There definitely appear to be non-Google alternatives.

        • fartographer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          8 days ago

          Got any advice on alternatives to Drive? I keep considering nextcloud, but people I know have said it’s a resource hog and finicky at best.

            • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              8 days ago

              This is the answer unless you consider setting up a DIY home server fun, which often the kinds of people who recommend options for this kind of thing do… so just keep that context in mind here with recommendations.

              Syncthing is a great solution and it is wayyyyy less a headache than any other DIY method I have done for replacing cloud/filesharing purposes.

              • TeddE@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                ·
                8 days ago

                Syncthing is what Dropbox was, before Dropbox became just another cloud data provider.

              • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                8 days ago

                just be sure to check if the deletions sync timeframe suits your case. in the new 2.0 deletions are not remembered forever

          • KneeTitts@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            people I know have said it’s a resource hog and finicky at best

            Those people may be the kind who tell you formatting your hard drive and reinstalling windows every other week is the best way to keep it ‘clean’.

            Ive been using Nextcloud at multiple businesses for years, its a rock.

            • paequ2@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              8 days ago

              Nextcloud definitely seems solid… but let’s be honest, it is definitely a resource hog. I tried deploying NextCloud on a VPS with 2GB of RAM, with most features turned off. The instance was empty. After a few minutes, I started getting alerts that I was using 100% of my memory.

              Nextcloud isn’t gonna work the way you expect it to with 2GB of RAM. It doesn’t seem like you’d be able to run this on some cheap, low powered device.

              Someone rewrite it in Rust! 😅

              • grue@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                8 days ago

                It’s 2025. Many cheap, low-powered devices have more than 2GB of RAM at this point.

              • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                Make sure you have swap enabled and it’s fine. Any file host is going to be aggressive with memory to cache all the files and metadata for quicker browsing.

          • druckbleistift@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            8 days ago

            If you’re looking to self-host, nextcloud is the way go. But if you’re just looking for a drive alternative, there’s plenty of simpler alternatives, like proton or kdrive.

          • NedRyerson@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            8 days ago

            The UI is a little crazy but I am a big fan of copyparty. I have moved my entire family off of Google Drive and we use copyparty, and it works great. Uploads are fast, lots of features, easy to stand up and doesn’t consume lots of resources. But like I said, the UI could be better.

            • freebee@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 days ago

              It’s very young and got very popular suddenly, someone will make a nice stable UI for it at some point…

              • NedRyerson@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 days ago

                I’ve heard that someone is working on one, so fingers crossed it comes out soonish. It’s fine for me as is, but it’s a little difficult to promote to people used to the simplied Google and Apple UIs

          • gdog05@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 days ago

            You’ve got some good suggestions, I think most of the suggestions I can think of. Nextcloud is of course the big one but after using it for quite a while, I think it’s important to break down your needs. If you need file sharing/syncing only, there are better options that are easier and faster. If you only need chat/voice, rocket chat is really lightweight and easy. If you need file sharing, online office suite, chat, etc. Then Nextcloud is the right option. Just keep in mind, even if you think you need some of those things, will anyone but you ever actually use them? No, they won’t, because they don’t appreciate how cool it is to self host and how much effort you put into it.

          • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            I run Nextcloud inside a VM, running on a decade+ old Intel gen 3 computer and the interface is snappier than navigating around google drive.

            It is finickier to self-host than syncthing though, if all you need is sync. There are also tones of providers out there that will sell you Nextcloud or similar services.

          • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Sign up for 10 different free accounts of Proton Drive? It has 5gb free cloud storage.

            Though I always prefer the simple physical backup to SD card and backup to PC.

            I also have a simple sshd server and use sftp when I’m feeling frisky.

            Sending from any device to any device using KDE connect is good too.

          • floofloof@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            I moved to pCloud + Cryptomator for general cloud file storage and Cryptpad for online document editing. These cover some of the main functions of Google Drive.

            Syncthing is good if you just want files to show up on more than one machine, with no cloud services involved.

        • mesa@piefed.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 days ago

          Email? Its about the only thing leaving me on googles platform ATM. I can self host (with mailinabox) but…I kinda dont want to? Its so much work and I would rather do other things with my time.

          • gdog05@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            8 days ago

            I wouldn’t self host email. But I would pay for a host and get away from Gmail. Wait until Black Friday and get free/cheap services from a bunch of places. Maybe even proton if you’re okay with them. Also, using your own domain for email is pretty cool (to me).

            • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              8 days ago

              Mozilla foundation is putting together a paid product under the Thunderbird brand. Folks are excited for that, the Firefox people are good people.

          • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            8 days ago

            I use my web host for email. I looked into hosting it myself but it looked way too fragile. The service is included with the website so it’s not like I’m spending any extra money that I wasn’t going to already…

            Maybe porkbun if you just need email?

            • jim3692@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              But Porkbun charges per mailbox.

              I pay for Tuta, and I have added my personal domain. It works as catch-all, allowing me to have an infinite amount of addresses, so I can use a different email on each website.

              • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 days ago

                I do the same (catch-all, unique every site), but if op doesn’t want to fiddle with that stuff, I’ve heard pb is okay. Just giving options.

          • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            I really like Runbox. Nothing particularity fancy, just pure standards compliant email, with excellent reputation, for a very low cost. They have a “drive” too.

            There’s also mailbox.org, tuta, the upcoming “thunder mail”, proton, fast mail, probably your domain provider or VPS provider offers email as an add on. Consider paying for a email and a domain. It can be as low as $30 a year, and you become the customer instead of the product. Owning your identity.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        63
        ·
        8 days ago

        You can stop using all Google products.

        My public school – that my children are basically required by law to attend, remember – is badgering me to sign a consent form so they can have Chromebooks.

        This fight is a lot fucking larger than mere individual boycotts!

          • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            Earlier in my school years, we had to use Microsoft Office products. Then later on we were expected to use Google Drive, as they wanted to teach us what we can use without paying Microsoft.

            At one point it was also mandatory to have a blog because the teacher was big on Web 2.0, and they of course pushed blogspot (Google). I think I went with managed wordpress instead, but may remember wrong.

            • blitzen@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              7 days ago

              They probably would have to find accommodation for you, although I’m sure it’d be very inconvenient. But still technically there.

              As to if you refuse to have your child be issued a Chromebook and Google account, probably not much you can do, as they are providing everything.

              My personal answer to this question is the same as if it were an employer issued mandatory Chromebook; me the employee (or my child the student) is a different entity than me the individual. Me the individual refuses to have anything to do with Google, and that’s enough of a fight for me.

              • seralth@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 days ago

                Around here if you can’t refuse. My coworker is currently fighting that battle. His basically being threatened by the state that he either complies, home schools and compiles with those requirements which still has google requirements. Or he has to deal with the legal penalties of not sending his kid to school.

                The accomodations is basically pay out of pocket for a private school. Because there is no accmodation for “free” services. Even the “poor” can do it so it’s a non optional expectation.

        • blitzen@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          8 days ago

          Mine too, so I do agree with you the issue is larger.

          But I believe it can start with individual boycotts.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            7 days ago

            I don’t know yet; I’m about to email the media coordinator to find out what happens when I refuse to sign the form.

            My kids already have Raspberry Pi 400s (might upgrade them to 500s soon), and I have about half a dozen other computers (not including old retired stuff or my pile of other Raspberry Pis), all running Linux. This house is not at all lacking in technology, and I no longer tolerate proprietary shit in it.

            What’s really fucked up is that the school district makes all these decisions basically unilaterally – not just for Chromebooks, but for other proprietary nonsense like ClassDojo and Remind and MySchoolBucks – and just assumes every parent will be cool with unquestioningly entering contracts with all these third-party entities. And even worse, most parents are cool with it!

            • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              7 days ago

              As someone from Russia, I grew up seeing movies where you all over there sue each other over unfortunate rude word.

              Perhaps that last paragraph is where you really should try suing someone, no jokes.

          • Euphoma@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 days ago

            At the highschool I went to, there was some standardized testing (act, ap tests) done in locked down software installed on the chromebooks. Like instead of logging into your user, it was before login with no browser or anything. It sometimes let you have desmos and a small place to take notes.

            • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              they mustve started using chromebooks in the 2010s, we dint have any of that nonsense in the 2000s, although it was not much better otherwise.

        • Solventbubbles@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          8 days ago

          Hang on, as somebody who knows enough to be looking into switching to graphene, but not entirely enough to know what AOSP is, what exactly is happening?

          Am I going to fuck myself over? If I do end up switching to a custom rom? Should I just wait on the Linux community to build something better?

          All I want is a working device that isn’t selling all my shit to Mark Zuckerberg

          • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            25
            ·
            8 days ago

            G is restricting the factory images/source (I believe) that graphene uses to build their system, so they are having to work backwards, take more time, etc. It’s a shitty thing to do but afaik it’s not a blocker. I’m typing this on a gos pixel 8 pro right now.

            Linux phones are still in their infancy, and are pretty shit if you need anything more than the ability to call and text (sms) on specific carriers (limitations applies to the USA, AUS, and a couple more I believe). I have a pinephone 1st gen and it’s… Cool for messing with, absolutely, but jesus christ it’s painful to actually attempt to use. I bought that 3y ago and not much has changed, from videos I’ve seen (my pinephone screen is lifting and failing so…). From a developer - like, bringing Linux to the phone platform - sure, grab one. As a user, unless you understand that you very likely will not daily this device (or any similar device) because shit just doesn’t work/isn’t ready and are OK with that… No, don’t. A few more years, maybe.

            • eodur@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              28
              ·
              8 days ago

              GrapheneOS is still moving ahead albeit slower, as you said. They are also working on a deal with a phone manufacturer to bring a more secure phone to market. I dunno whether it will just meet the same security levels of the Pixels and ship with stock Android, or if it will be a full GrapheneOS Phone. I’m hoping for the latter, but it will more likely be the former. Fingers crossed.

              • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                8 days ago

                Yeah, I’ve heard rumors about that in the works but it’ll take a while. I try not to get excited before any product is released, but it will be something I investigate if/when I can pick one up. It’s been frustrating that other similar phones are EU-only, so I hope that won’t be the case with their attempt.

          • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 days ago

            If you get a device and install Graphine now, it should be fine. It’s your future device options that will probably not include an AOSP alternative os. Hopefully Linux will be an option then, but there might be a bit of a dark age in between.

      • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        8 days ago

        You can stop using all Google products.

        That may be true for you, but other people face different realities. When Google implements the sideloading block it will eventually be pushed to everyone who doesn’t use a custom ROM.

        • fishpen0@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Yes, many at risk programs and housing programs and even Medicare and Medicaid provide phones and other devices to members and those device contracts with Google or via a cellular provider are for hundreds of thousands to millions of people depending on the state or federal program doing the purchasing. There isn’t a reality where those contracts will ever not be for first party devices. Even if we wanted to we couldn’t buy people one plus or other non-Google branded android devices and laptops in these programs because the companies selling them don’t meet various regulatory standards required by the programs.

          These people are literally the most at risk and don’t get individual choice for their devices. The devices are being provided in the first place because too many modern systems require internet and phone access. Id.me, login.gov, MFA for your library app, your epic or Athena portals for healthcare, etc…

        • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          I wonder if it’s economically plausible to make a FPGA-based all-in-one system. In a “smartphone” box, maybe far weaker than most Android phones, but far less tall in expertise needed to do anything, for a low start to be possible without humongous investment and expected minimal parties. Something graphical Lisp-based as an OS. Perhaps with an interface to use it as a tablet when attached to a bigger box, or a laptop when attached to that box.

          Focusing on having the necessary modules and input-output devices, with the FPGA itself being configured with something simple-enough RISC-V based with tagged memory, for example.

          Like when you need a portable computer with cell connectivity and a battery, and want to have some choice, but are not too attached to specific platforms and popular places.

          It seems that for militaries using FPGA is already an established practice, turns out to be more convenient and even cheaper. And with anything trying to fight big companies, it seems using FPGA will make more sense.

          I mean, Sun Tzu wrote about “when you know your enemy and know yourself”, all that. Knowing myself I’m certain that trying to take on anyone bigger and smarter than me using things on their level of complexity is a failure from the start. Knowing them is beyond my ability in general, but we definitely know that those companies are led by very intelligent people who just won’t make the simpler kind of mistakes. And he also wrote a bit on the “death grounds”, where if you leave a path for retreat, that’s not a death ground. I think paths for retreat like alternative Android versions and such are all intentionally let be, so that you’d not resist too much.

          Or, this is sort of a fewer dream, or bipolar psychosis to be more specific.

      • Squiddork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        8 days ago

        Honestly Googles products are terrible these days. I have been pretty lax about my privacy but after so much enshittification I switched my services to something that works and doesn’t harvest my data for the privilege.

        When they kill off Graphene/Custom ROMs I’ll switch to a linux phone or brickphone.

      • paequ2@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 days ago

        Uhh… how do we stop using Android? I mean, these recent attacks by Google seem like they’re going to break GrapheneOS and friends, no?

          • toddestan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 days ago

            While pretty neat, I’d have a hard time even calling the WiPhone a phone if it doesn’t have a cellular modem. You’re entirely dependent on having a wifi connection. I suppose it could serve as a replacement for a landline, but that’s about it.

            • mesa@piefed.socialOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 days ago

              Yep! Its so close.

              Looks like they had plans for LTE. Dunno how hard it is to ser up. Probably very hard.

          • paequ2@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            8 days ago

            Oh, thank god Apple lets users install whatever software they want—hey, wait a minute…

            • blitzen@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              8 days ago

              The question wasn’t how to switch OSs without losing current capabilities, it was how to stop using Android. Switching OS is how.

              Losing side loading is something being lost either way.

              • paequ2@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                15
                ·
                8 days ago

                The question wasn’t how to switch OSs without losing current capabilities

                This is exactly the question. The article is about Google taking away software freedom, forcing developers to dox themselves, and forcing users to only install software from Google’s approved list.

                Apple is already there. How would that help anyone?

                • blitzen@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  At the very least, the threat of losing a large number of users may cause Google to reverse their decision.

              • Euphoma@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                8 days ago

                Ios is bad. I’d rather have locked down android with the official terminal, rather than go back to using the iSh[1] app for terminal on ios

                [1] https://ish.app/

      • MrSmith@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        De-googling will break banking apps, since most baking apps rely on Play Integrity checks and bootloader status.

        • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          I feel like this isnt always true. I had a GrapheneOS pixel for a while and it never had problems with banking apps

          • MrSmith@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            7 days ago

            What a pompous and clueless suggestion. Some modern internet banks are app-olny.

            Good luck with your revolution where 10 people are able to participate.

              • PigeonEnjoyer@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                7 days ago

                There are a couple of issues with that mentality, there are some countries in which money transitions almost entirely revolve around proprietary apps and services, Sweden for example (a decent article that talks about Sweden in particular). In my country, I can’t find any public information on which banks require apps and which don’t. The bank that I am currently using does have a website, but I have to login with a one-time password generated from an app. Also, going to a different bank assumes the same bank won’t do the same and exclusively require an app down the line.

                • blitzen@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  I’ve actually never seen a bank that an app is the ONLY option. And two factor codes should be able to be generated by any number of (sometimes FOSS) apps.

                • blitzen@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  I don’t understand why you’d have to do that? I have literally zero Google interaction and I don’t have to custom build something. And I access my banks (plural) in browser only.

      • FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        I was thinking of switching to Proton. I use Gmail, Google Photos, Google Messages, Drive, Keep, Maps, Docs, Sheets. I pay $2 a month for 100gb and unlimited photos on Google. It’s a good deal. The fact that I would have to find out out to make a server, buy storage, piece meal a bunch of open source software that will inevitably not work without tinkering all makes it so easy just to pay the $2 a month.

        • sibachian@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 days ago

          i pay $20 a year for basically all of that and even more stuff but open source provided and maintained by a local server company in my country. of course i don’t use half of their offerings because some stuff has alternatives more suited for the platform or its simply not needed. but e.g. their service offers nextcloud which has most of the stuff you listed bundled into the platform by default. and then they have another 50 services added on top available for use.

        • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          Once I moved away from Gmail cutting off Google services became easy along with finding alternatives. Even if I use Google products like YouTube I can do it without an account with stuff like freetube to have a subscription feed locally and be able to save playlists and keep track of watch history.

          So yeah even if Google products are used it becomes less account dependent, so you need a Google account less and less. And changing to a non Gmail email provider was the gateway.

    • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      I think they are more conscious than to be driven by small margins (another example of such underestimation is Lenin’s “they’ll sell us the rope we’ll use to hang them”).

      It’s like boiling frogs - a very slow process of attracting users, slowly killing competition and diversity, slowly making the ecosystem more and more controlled, then slowly making “neutral” systems not neutral anymore (like those features of Chrome making security exceptions for Google services found a few years ago), and slowly desensitizing people to leaps of faith they do trusting Google (and other companies), while the trust accumulates into total control.

    • OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      This is not late stage capitalism. This is mid stage at best. The entire economy and world population could be shrunk down to literally pennies, as the wealth gap widens. It could have us ending up like district 9, or Elysium as broad examples. The govt and entities have not even started cracking down on illegal activities, loop holes, bank accounts, cash spending, crypto, and more in the super strict enforced fashion they could be.

      While rightly fucked up and enshittified. We could be so so much further down the capitalism rabbit hole of hell. Everyone should be boycotting and avoiding the largest companies as a whole. No change you make goes unnoticed. You might be less than 1 percent but the snowball effects happen. Movements, parties, resistance, change, software, everything adds up.

      So what you can do. Don’t go mentally insane about it. Most things don’t require THAT much effort. A simple tweak here or there makes an impact.

        • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          8 days ago

          why do we need a new one? can’t android be salvaged? lots of things have been solved already in a way that makes a relatively good foundation.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            8 days ago

            All the non-Google entities that build stuff on Android need to start banding together instead of siloing themselves. If AOSP is being closed, they need to create a non-profit replacement for it.

            • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              7 days ago

              The fucked up part is nowadays third parties like banks or sometimes even governments make apps rely on Google services, so you can’t use an ungoogled phone for stuff you actually need for life…

            • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 days ago

              right! I never understood why isn’t there more cooperation between different foss roms, at least sharing patches and coordinating some work.

            • cabbage@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              7 days ago

              I guess if Google closes down AOSP it would get forked, and the fork would probably be a separate thing from the current Android distributions. So that the landscape would continue to look a bit like today, except that AOSP would be an independent thing.

              Then I guess it’s possible that Google would seek to make android apps incompatible, gradually making the whole thing kinda pointless. I can’t say I’m using Android for the great UX - I’m using it because it supports a few apps I continue to be forced to use. If I can’t use them on Android any more I’m switching to Ubuntu Touch or PostmarketOS in a heartbeat.

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        Makes me curious if they think their monopoly or whatever they were called cases making them split their browser are going to go though. If you are going to have to sell parts of the company, now would be the time to hammer home any last minute bad things that would make the companies more profitable. Shows higher income for the sale, and gets it out of the way so the new purchaser doesn’t look like the ones who did it, but rather the ones who will make announcements on how they will review things to make them better for the user base.

        Doesn’t mean they’ll follow through on them, but it takes the evil and sticks it with the old owners.

      • OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        I disagree. Google has always been a thinly veiled Microsoft. A wolf in sheeps clothing. They embrace, extend, extinguish. It’s the same thing.

    • Axum@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      We need open bootloader and drivers for phones to make any real progress on this. This is what’s holding back all initiatives.

      • Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        I wonder if the generic tablets with made up Asian sounding names that you see on the big marketplaces could work? They could have slightly larger or smaller screens if they’re cheaper than current phone screens, and could have Linux with something like Signal on them for calling.

        They’d probably be lower quality to begin with, but could potentially get better if people start to buy them. They seem to have generic hardware, so might be able to offer the drivers and unlockable bootloaders too :)

    • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      the best outcome for the short term would be to forcibly take away android from google and give it to an independent foundation. as I heard antitrust proceedings in the usa were heading that way a few months ago

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 days ago

        Not bad, it looks like I have to buy their phone though. Which is not cheap, or performant guessing by the specs despite what the advertising says.

        • Lemminary@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 days ago

          I saw someone else recommending it. I only hope they take this opportunity to release the OS for everyone, but since they’re for-profit, I doubt they will.

      • toddestan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Interesting. I’ve not heard of FuriOS, but if it is a Linux phone that actually can be used with US carriers, makes calls and supports SMS/MMS, and can do VoLTE that’s a actually a pretty big deal.

      • tomalley8342@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Whenever you see a linux phone advertise both security and android app support, you should be wary, since it’s likely waydroid or a waydroid fork, and their design goal of running android in a container instead of a VM has lead to some interesting security decisions.

        • cabbage@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          I would be very happy if anyone could explain to me in a simple and coherent way why I, as a normal user who am aware of what I am doing on my device and am not targeted by any group that’s out to get me, would need a “hardened malloc”, “secure app spawning”, “vanadium browser and webview”, or a “hardened PDF viewer”. The last of these four is the only thing that means anything to me, and it sounds dumb. Yeah, I know PDFs can be dangerous if you open random shit, but come on.

          If I run Waydroid it’s only to get my banking app (trusted source) and Whatsapp (not a trusted source but not directly malware either) working. I hardly need their hardened PDF reader.

          • tomalley8342@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            Not just your two android apps, any program on your system that is aware of your waydroid installation could potentially use it as a path to escalate themselves to root, which is generally regarded as a bad outcome. If you don’t care about that kind of thing, or don’t think that could ever happen to you, that’s certainly within your rights to hold such a viewpoint.

          • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            You realize how many things have gotten shittier since android 11? Accubattery isn’t even allowed to monitor everything using up juice any more. You can’t customize your own charging curves, you’re locked out of accessing portions of your storage on your own phone, and a lot of great power user apks had to completely hit themselves or just stop working all together.

            What do you need from after 11 that an apk wouldn’t have allowed you to do already?

  • zarathustra0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    I don’t know about anyone else, but I got into computers at a young age because it gave me a sense of control over something. I didn’t understand everything, but I could do a lot of trial and error, read things and experiment, build cool things, and I shared a sense of community with some random internet strangers based on that knowledge.

    In a world where we are so powerless in so many other ways, why did we insist on bringing that power dynamic into the new bright tech sphere? Why did we have to do that? (N.B. this is rhetorical questioning).

    • KneeTitts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      In the new Alien Earth TV show, 5 corporations basically run everything… unfortunately I suspect thats where we are headed as a species.

      • iLStrix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        My university actually teaches about the “Meger Endgame theory” (yes, my professor had fun with that one), which states that industries will consolidate until 2-3 global market leaders dominate. So uhh, it’s not just you. Idk if that’s good or bad news for you haha

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      8 days ago

      There are at least two generations of us who are disappointed at the contrast between tech’s possibilities as envisioned decades ago and the corporate surveillance crap we have to put up with today.

      • Darren@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        The thing that really gets to me is how we’ve gone from “Here, let us sell you a computer that you can push to its limits however you see fit” to “We will sell you a device and ensure you use that device within a given sphere of acceptability”.

        I own this phone/computer/tablet/console/whatever, so why the fuck do I have to adhere to their rules? Rules they’ve changed since I bought the device, of course.

    • We, as in the average every day people, didn’t do shit. The corporations that make the shit we use are the ones who got us here. The only thing the people using the devices and software are guilty of is not making a fuss about losing control over the stuff becsuse the average person does not care that deeply about the tools and likely doesn’t even know about a good 75% of what was lost.

    • Axum@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Sadly the majority of normal people don’t want control. They just want it to do some trivial task without any fuss at any cost.

  • Mika@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    When reading cyberpunk lore, quickhacks didn’t make any sense to me. Some programs that break cyberware because of backdoors, but why would people install cyberware with backdoors?

    Now I look at the sad state of mobile market and, yeah ok, that makes sense.

      • Mika@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Some really vicious backdoor that contains dangerous substance in a hidden chamber? Not a far reach when we are talking about corporate backdoors normalized.

      • emeralddawn45@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 days ago

        I mean the cyberware is a direct neural interface so presumably it must be able to manipulate and alter the levels and balance of your neurotransmitters. Im sure increasing aome to insane levels would have pretty toxic effects, like serotonin syndrome for example.

        • okmko@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          I suppose that’s a good enough hand wave explanation.

          I thought though, just purely for curiosities sake, that neurotransmitters are released by a voltage potential difference over some sort of gate caused by a flood of sodium ions (a chemical signal), and it’s not just a matter of conducting current. That means the cyberware has to somehow attach inside the axon and on the outside, across the gate to create that voltage difference. And that’s for one gate.

          I feel like the more one thinks about this the more the name should be changed to 3077.