snooggums

I know, but the others are mistped or logically wrong but close enough to know what they meant and this one just has a completely different meaning unrelated to the context it is used.

It stood out from the crowd.

All intensive purposes

Wait a minute…

Voting while planning a revolution is like sealing up a broken window with plastic until you can replace it. Basic maintenance so the whole thing doesn’t get worse before the replacement is ready.

So playing the first round of Russian Roulette for no real benefit.

Congrats I guess.

You can always use the recorder cover to see if they make a comment about liking the real version.

I am offended by your use of ‘people’, that excludes folk and kin!

Rawr!

Trying to overthrow the election and then not getting the military involved is not the bare minimum.

JFC

He didn’t nuke California either!

What a ridiculous bar you are using for leaving office.

No, he was removed from office. That isn’t something he did, that was something that was done to him because he lost an election.

He’s genuinely himself. Even if he contradicts himself I think it all comes from his own head and he’s not taking the standard approach of rehearsing speeches ad nauseum and censoring himself because of what some focus group said.

That is stupid when the person being themselves is a piece of shit. Do you think Hitler being his genuine self is a positive?

He did come out in support of banning bump stocks.

He was also in favor of gun proliferation and he contradicted his opposition to bump stocks because his genuine self is trying to play both sides.

Despite personal views on COVID he did generally support the emergency actions necessary in a pandemic scenario.

He also constantly undermined them by saying covid was a hoax and telling people they didn’t need to wear masks or be vaccinated.

Your three things are all stupid and you are praising him for being a terrible person.

It isn’t possible when one candidate has zero redeeming qualities. Trump accomplished nothing other then undermining democracy, undermining trust in science, and stoking xenophobia. He didn’t even accidentally do something right.

Yup, he even undermined the few things that were not complete trainwrecks under his watch. Someone actually posted he got the vaccine done quickly which is both wrong (he didn’t have jack shit to do with it) but him perpetuating the lie that covid was a hoax led to people refusing the vaccine!

He has zero redeeming qualities. Not a single one.

I know there are a lot of people who love it for the same reasons I hated it, people have different tastes.

I love Lord of the Flies because it gets to the point!

Moby Dick is the book I hated the most. Just the worst slog that i remember making it through.

Since the vast majority of website users are minimally engaged, I would love for a few more active posters for stability of content and discussion, but not a massive influx of users just to have users.

I also don’t want a plethora of users who get banned repeatedly for not being self aware that their behavior is the problem. The occasional crossed wires ban, no biggie, but thinking there are so many glass people that creating dozens of alts is necessary is not a good look.

Have fun with your counterproductive moral superiority then.

Then don’t vote for genociders, let alone sheepdog for others to do the same, and do something actually politically helpful. Become educated and join organizations that have had solidarity with Palestine from day 1.

Something politically helpful like letting Trump get elected and go full genocide against Israel, migrants, and most likely a portion of the US. Yeah, that will be very politically helpful compared to voting against Trump.

Glad I’m not the only one!

Great art tho!

Belief is either something I want to be true, or seems true although I don’t have solid evidence. I believe that in the universe there will be many worlds with living beings that eventually evolve to be comparable to humans in mental capacity and the ability to create, but that due to how space time works we will never directly interact with them. They won’t be close enough, or our time periods of existence won’t match up if either of us attempt interstellar travel. Millions of years is a blink of an eye in the scope of the universe, but it is so vast that the odds are high that another planet will have similar conditions for carbon based life, not to mention other possible forms of life.

Knowledge is supported by evidence. It might not be a perfect explanation or understanding, but it is what is known based on the current information. We now know planets exist around other stars, but before we could observe them it would be a belief to say they existed. The difference is supporting evidence.

“The mission order made it clear that the IDF is instructed to thwart an attempt by Hamas terrorists to take over the aid trucks that entered Gaza."

Yet they attacked a bunch of convoys that weren’t being taken over by Hamas, so this is just the IDF trying to pass on the blame for something they did.