It’s not undefined. You cannot take the exponential of anything with dimensions. That also applied to logs and trigonometric functions. Ergo, angles must be unitless.
- 0 Posts
- 81 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: June 18th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
You disagree that a ratio is unitless? What’s the cos of a unit?
No one stops you from putting radians and steradians in your units. But it’s unitless by definition.
Proven*
Samples sizes are always small, confounding variables poorly controlled and control groups often contaminated.
Long term effect are also poorly studied.
Except it’s not a unit, it’s a unitless ratio. You’d have one for every number of dimension. The mol is arguably the extra one.
Toph metalbends mercury, so it’s definitely earth.
In French there’s no acronym. We just learn it. It’s not that hard.
36.23 × 20% = 36.23 × 2 ÷ 10 = 7.246
26·2 months agoPick real time and let people adjust their schedules. It’s easier and the science backs it up.
Or you know, a sail.
And this is why mercurial is king. It just works.
That definition exists because if you want to include Pluto and be consistent you have to include dozens of other bodies.
I put everyone on LMDE
6·3 months agoAnything with PvP.
No thanks. Make your own country and we’ll be allies.
Neither my work config (2 + laptop) nor my home setup (ultrawide + 1) are there. Be uncategorizable!
1·4 months agoPython is more system agnostic though.
17·4 months agoI really don’t get it either.
It’s not like it’s a paid product either.
You’re conflating UI and definitions.
Angular velocity can be given in rad/s. No one will bat an eye if you do that. It’s even recommended. But it’s not a unit in the same sense than the other ones.