• 3 Posts
  • 434 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 22nd, 2023

help-circle

  • Erase the existence of, as in not just kill but remove all impact they had on the world. I’m going for people who killed large numbers and set the world towards Authoritarian paths causing generations of negative progress.

    Hitler, obvs. Pol Pot, Genghis Khan, Idi Amin, Kim Il-sung, Leopold II. I’d have to refresh myself on details to pick top 3 but it would be people like those.

    The label “Politician” stops applying when they become dictators and no longer have to work to earn their constituents’ support, IMO.








  • When the pros no longer outweigh the cons.

    I work in a field that offers full tuition reimbursement commonly, so money isn’t a barrier. No con there.

    I don’t have kids, so that greatly alleviates time capacity. So some con there but not as much as a parent of young kid(s) would face.

    I have progressed far enough in my career and am on a path where another degree won’t really help me reach my career goals, so no significant pro there.

    Personal curiosity and ego do motivate me slightly. Even if I never use it at work, I would be keen to have work pay for another degree that I have personal interest in. I also like having advanced degrees solely for the accomplishment. So minor pros there.

    In summary, not too late for me but easy to see that’s not the case for everyone else.


  • Anyone I’ve ever heard talking about the non-aggression principle spat red flags faster than a machine gun.

    At best, they’re truly so dense and unsympathetic they don’t recognize actions that aren’t directly or intentionally causing harm do still cause harm (example, the free state project people leaving food out for black bears “because they can” without thought for their neighbors who then have to deal with more bears). At worst, it’s rape apologia (crap like statutory rape doesn’t exist because that minor “totally asked for it” and the rape didn’t cause physical damage).









  • Vanth@reddthat.comtoAsklemmy@lemmy.mlDo you prefer to work alone or in a group?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Mix of both. My job requires a lot of collaboration on some things, and others require deep dives into really dry texts that I prefer to do solo.

    I prefer remote work. I’m on video calls with people all over the world most days so there’s no reason to be in any specific location. Home allows for no commute time, privacy, better lunch, so many reasons.

    No AI replacement for tasks so far. The company I work for has an internal client that is supposed to answer queries based on all those dry texts mentioned above. But when I tested I found 16/20 attempts came back with inaccurate information on initial query and I would say roughly one third of those would not be reasonably caught by someone not very familiar with the texts like I am.

    I think there are some opportunities for AI, more along the lines of automating standard workflows, but I have no time to build them because they’ve already fired 3/4 of my team in advance of “expected efficiencies thanks to AI”. I’m also not an IT / Digital Tools person. Nothing about my job is related to building AI tools and they haven’t provided us with skills-appropriate tools. So my team is just prioritizing and saying “no” to the bottom half of the list we no longer have capacity to support. I feel increasingly insecure in my job every time we say “no” but I also won’t push my team to work an obscene number of hours per week.