Cat’s are not communist, they are anarchists 100%
Let’s be honest. If a cat could choose its job, it would choose landlord, but only if “generic capitalist who exploits people” is not an option. They are the least communist animals.
You try explaining private property to a cat
And where do they do it most? In your chair, man!
Does dronies define liberals only or is it anyone center-right?
I think it means imperial core liberals, and I think it’s in reference to:
But now that drones have become ubiquitous in warfare, it doesn’t make much sense anymore.
i want to imagine that it came from a world too innocent to believe that drones would become so ubiquitous in warfare. lol
Removed by mod
Dronies? Is this an evolution of takies? A subspicies?
I think it originally referred to the people supporting the droning of civilians in the middle east in guise of “fighting terrorism”. Nowadays it refers to liberals who blindly support everything NATO and their allies are doing.
don’t know; that’s why i asked
I recognize “Uni” the cat from https://youtube.com/@Unicouniuni3
Socialism dies as soon as a single person becomes its absolute leader. From there, it is just a walk toward authoritarism.
Oh you mean in a fictional scenario that does not exist in the real world?
Why are you making up scenarios that have never existed?
To be honest, I know little about Mao and beginnings of PRC - I’m quite ignorant about how much of an “absolute leader” he was.
But I do believe that idolizing a person and concentration of power are dangerous to democracy.
And it’s interesting how much responses I got on this topic.
Among Marxists, we say “no investigation, no right to speak.” This quote is from Mao, and the importance of upholding it is to not contribute to a miasma of misinformation. If you don’t know about Mao, then don’t speak as though you understand him and his role in the history of Socialism.
This is reflected in the ideas you claim about “idolization.” Mao held immense respect among the people for successfully bringing the revolution to victory and implementing many great economic decisions during the early and middle parts of his political career. This creates “idolization,” but he wasn’t an absolute leader - he lost political influence for his mistakes during the Cultural Revolution and his reputation tarnished, as well as his foreign policy towards the middle and latter parts with respect to Cambodia and Vietnam.
“Concentration of power” isn’t what happened. With the rise of the Communists, power was spread more evenly among the people, rather than concentrated in the Landlords, Bourgeoisie, Petite Bourgeoisie, and Kuomintang. The implementation of the People’s Democratic Dictatorship resulted in more direct democracy for the peasantry and proletariat, as well as the implementation of the Mass Line as the theoretical basis of communication between the party and the masses.
I can offer recommendations if you want to learn more about Marxism-Leninism and Marxism-Leninism-MZT. I think your analysis of Socialism will be improved if you do more reading and research, and less discussion of concepts and subjects you aren’t familiar with. That’s why you got the response you did.
Sure, do recommend - I’d need a basic overview, but not too deep, as I don’t have enough motivation for in-depth review of all socialist governments in the last two centuries.
I made an introductory Marxist-Leninist reading list you can check out for theory, but it’s in-depth. Dessalines has a Crash-Course and FAQ that I like if you want something short and to the point.
I love authoritarianism because it means “when nonwesterners rule”. And then the socialism becomes (socialism in a nonwestern language).
I would say that Hungary is currently quite authoritarian. And Serbia too. Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy were too, very much so.
See? Hungary and Serbia are not “white”, so they are “authoritarian”.
I agree kinda, I don’t think Mao weaseled his way to becoming an absolute leader, more like history created the specific circumstances that lead to him in that position and the historical situation of the 20th century created all these leaders. We like to pretend that the west didn’t have these single person political leaders, but honestly what the fuck was Henry Kissinger or FDR? These figures exist all over 20th century history most countries literally had their leader.
Maos biggest mistake was not absolving himself of responsibility and power because guess what those things are fucking awesome and most humans who have responsibility and power love it and never want to give that shit up just look at old people.
Mao was ousted from power as time went on due to mistakes made during the Cultural Revolution. He wasn’t an “Absolute Leader,” he was extremely popular for successfully leading a socialist revolution and implementing extremely successful policies (towards the beginning and middle).
I’m not saying Mao was unaccomplished but towards the end he was considered an absolute leader and he was not very chill, he locked up a lot of people during the cultural revolution sometimes for quite arbitrary reasons. Some of his policies were also a disaster the backyard steel and culling of the sparrows are usually the two that westerners always like to hold on to. The mistakes he made during the cultural revolution were really bad. I don’t hate Mao I read his little red book as a teenager and I enjoyed it, I just didn’t find it to be very relevant to me. I grew up in the west though I’m sure if you were a young Indian or something Mao would hit completely differently.
I also found it really interesting that deepseek would refuse to answer any questions on Mao. Anyways we should view these people as they were human beings who managed to become very powerful and made many of the mistakes that are associated with that. Honestly otherwise you’re just doing lefty great man stuff.
He was not considered an Absolute Leader. He held tremendous respect until he lost it from mistakes he made during the Cultural Revolution, and gradually lost political power and influence until his death. As someone in the US Empire, much of his writing on Dialectical Materialism and Party Work are immensely valuable, among other works. Nobody is denying the mistakes of Mao, we are denying the Great Man Theory aspect of your analysis that pins Mao as some absolute leader despite clearly being ousted once his policies were no longer popular.
As for Deepseek, it refrains from political discussion in general.
I don’t think Mao was a great man in the Thomas Carlyle sense, I think he was very powerful man who was at some point an absolute leader. I guess we just disagree on that point which is fine. Also when was Mao ousted exactly and where can I read about this because everything I have read Mao remained the chairman until his death. Deep seek has no problems talking talking about politics it doesn’t however want to talk about any Chinese politicians. I just tested it out.
What is an “absolute leader” if his policies were not accepted absolutely and his power was systematically weakened later in life? Mao held many positions throughout his life in the CPC, and was Chairman of the CPC until death, but more major positions like Premier were held by other figures, and his influence over the party waned as time went on within the positions he did retain. For instance, he stepped down as President in 1959.
He retained massive influence, but his influence was greater earlier on, and the influence of others rose as time went on. The CPC’s current evaluation of Mao is along the lines of “70% good, 30% bad.” They also, however, refuse to take the road of Kruschev with Stalin, which ended up contributing to the destruction of the Soviet Union.
I think there was a point when if Mao said jump you asked how high. I’m sure this wasn’t the case at all times and if you can give me some cool reading suggestions I’ll gladly check it out. I just think that sadly power dynamics like this can develop in political organisations no matter what ideology the members hold. If you really want to know my crazy beliefs it’s that hyper intelligence may not be an evolutionary beneficial trait, but who knows maybe I’m wrong maybe humanity will survive the complete destruction of earths ecosystems and global heating of 3-4 degrees which I think we will easily hit by 2100.
he locked up a lot of people during the cultural revolution sometimes for quite arbitrary reasons
He was not the one who signed arrest orders or ran trials though, a lot of different people were involved in that. You can’t blame Mao as an individual for stuff that other people did. You can’t run an entire state with just one person.
the backyard steel and culling of the sparrows
Nobody in the 60s knew about the importance of sparrows in agriculture. Not even in the West. I think it’s easy to say “oh well duh of course don’t kill the sparrows” but who here among us is an actual farmer? Who here knew that sparrows ate more bugs than grain before it was told to them? I can barely grow a plant, I have no room to judge others when it comes to growing food.
I just didn’t find it to be very relevant to me
I’m an adult in Europe and I find Mao’s writing to be both relevant and applicable. But there is Mao the general and Mao the chairman. By the end of his life he was definitely saying some stuff that I don’t think even he believed in. But theory is an all encompassing body, and that is true in all fields. One couldn’t read one physics paper about gravity and then say “now I know how to launch a rocket to the moon”. I opened up my copy of the red book randomly and here’s one:
“Take the ideas of the masses and concentrate them, then go to the masses, persevere in the ideas and carry them through, so as to form correct ideas and leadership – such is the basic method of leadership”
It makes perfect sense to me, but that’s also because I have the associated baggage to understand what he means there and how that fits in not only to more of Mao’s writings but also in regards to other figures, the ‘best practices’ if you will of organizing.
I also found it really interesting that deepseek would refuse to answer any questions on Mao
The deepseek devs want it to be mainly used for math, coding, and other STEM applications for lack of a better word. There’s nothing wrong with that, in fact personally I think people should stop using LLMs as oracles so much and focus them on tasks instead. Deepseek produces great results (and all for free with no rate limits) if you give it some code to start with, because it needs proper framing of the project to avoid trying to overdo it. I usually start with chatGPT, have it do the first working version of the code, and then switch it to deepseek to finish it, and it works almost perfect on the first try.
I’m a farmer and in my country people use fireworks to scare sparrows away to this day, some even shoot them.
I just recently learned that Methyl anthranilate, the artificial grape flavoring, also repels birds and is used heavily by the agro industry nowadays. I imagine because of all the other products they also use they don’t need the birds around anymore.
You can also use old cd-roms tied to a long-ish string btw, the sparkling makes birds stay away.
Meh environmentalists were dismissed and often persecuted in communist countries and generally not taken seriously, sorry I’m not giving them a pass here. Modern China is much better though. Even if Mao didn’t sign all the arrest warrants and didn’t know what’s going on that doesn’t really absolve him in my eyes.
It’s cool that you find Mao relevant I don’t but that’s just my personal opinion and not a dismissal of the man himself. I forgot the dudes name but there is an American who was in China for most of the revolution and he knew Mao and said there was a huge difference between young and old Mao he definitely became more authoritarian and closed minded as he grew older. I read the little red book 14 years ago so I can’t remember much of it,I just remember not finding a lot of it to be applicable to my life at the time, maybe if I read it now it would be different.
I don’t use LLMs and I don’t code so I never use them. I was just more interested in what deep seek had to had to say about Mao and was suprised it wouldn’t even let you broach the subject. If I ask deep seek to tell me about bill Clinton it will give me a response, if I ask it to tell me about Mao or any Chinese leader for that matter which I find interesting.
Anyways out of all the 20th century revolutionaries Fidel was more my guy but that’s just personal preference I guess. IMO what is worst for socialism is socialist parties being unable to allow themselves to be criticised this was sadly often the case in communist parties.
I think that this video gave me the best insight into how China works nowadays, and I suspect things weren’t entirely dissimilar in the past: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1TeeIG6Uaw I also looked into things like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_People’s_Congress and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Congress_of_the_Chinese_Communist_Party after starting from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China and it seems that things are pretty complicated. For example: Due to the temporary nature of the plenary sessions, most of NPC’s power is delegated to the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress (NPCSC), which consists of about 170 legislators and meets in continuous bi-monthly sessions, when its parent NPC is not in session.
this is actually a surprisingly good overview from a western publication https://www.noemamag.com/what-the-west-misunderstands-about-power-in-china/
this is also a great resource for understanding how the government is structured https://news.cgtn.com/event/2021/who-runs-the-cpc/index.html
Cool thanks I’ll check it out.
