• glimse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’d not that it’s criticized, it’s just kinda funny that everything comes back to steam engines

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Oh for sure. It’s like a desire path or evolution’s crab in that way. I think I just misunderstood people’s criticisms as belittlement of the process without them understanding why it’s still the standard.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Fair enough, I’m sure people DO criticize it but it’s mostly a joke.

        On a side note, are there any theoretical energy sources that DON’T involve steam? I’m not well-versed

        • macarthur_park@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Solar (photovoltaics), wind turbines, and hydroelectric are a few non-steam energy sources in use.

          As for theoretical sources, some of the pulsed-power fusion concepts use the electromagnetic pulse from fusion to directly induce electrical power. But none of these have been demonstrated yet.