French operator SNCF has previously asked passengers to self-declare as ‘Monsieur’ or ‘Madame’.

The EU’s top court ruled on Thursday that requiring rail passengers to declare a gender when buying a ticket is in breach of the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

  • amelore@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Their mistake was not to add the “prefer not to say” option, now they can’t collect any gender stats.

    • OfficerBribe@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think it wouldn’t fly either since verdict was that this is GDPR problem - there was no need to collect this info.

      • amelore@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah mostly, “prefer not to say” kinda means it’s optional. You’re allowed to use optional non-essential stuff like this, you do have to state why and not use it for other things. So they could use “Madame Lastname” to address their emails to you if they say that’s what it’s for but not reuse that for market research.

        I put it like this because that would have avoided the complaint and most likely the court case too.

  • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    The Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) ruled against French rail operator SNCF, which has previously required passengers to self-declare as either “Monsieur” or “Madame” when booking train tickets online, deeming it unnecessary information under the GDPR.

    The case was brought by the French association Mousse, whose mission is to “campaign for justice for the LGBTQI+ community,” according to its website.

    Holy crap, what evil company would let this make it to court?

    When a queer NGO asks you to please allow folks to book a train without entering a gender, just fucking make that change.

    Ignoring them and having to go to court over it is absurd.

    • Luckaneer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Wonder if it was a weird cost thing, like it’s ridiculously difficult/costly to change their ticketing infrastructure to cope with this?

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Probably not “ridiculously costly” but companies like cheaping out on… well, everything.

  • TanteRegenbogen@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Chere SNCF, je suis eune mondame, comme mon genre est non-binaire! [Liebe SNCF, ich bin eine “mondame” [Geschlechtsneutrale Alternative zu madame/monsieur, entsprechend Herr*in], da mein [soziales] Geschlecht nicht binär ist!]

    Englisch: Dear SNCF, I am a “mondame”, due to my gender being non-binary!

  • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Is this like the first step towards having gender-specific train cars? Does France have an issue with harassment on trains like some other countries/cultures? Or are they just being weird about gender?

    • Hawke@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think it’s the opposite of that. They stopped asking about the gender of the passengers.

        • Ziggurat@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Asking whether they write sir or madam on the ticket as a form of politeness. Sure it helps collecting statistics too.

          Conservative are weird, the will be fine with asking sir or madam, but would throw a tantrum if you ask them a pronoum which is exactly the same question

          • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Sure, but is that a reason to make it mandatory? If someone does not want to share the information, then saying “non, we must be polite to you!” doesn’t make a lot of sense.

            • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Probably whoever drafted the requirements for the software team just didn’t think to add a third option, and the software team didn’t want to add additional requirements.

        • Hawke@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Probably a mixture of tradition/inertia and old-fashioned identification ideas.

            • gift_of_gab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              I wanted to see if you were the same name I remember posting similar eye-roll inducing things in the past but, you know:

              deleted by creator

              • ikt@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                Bonjour Monsieur! (Please don’t sue me 😱)

                That’s ok, sometimes I’m right, sometimes I’m wrong, I tried to block many of the more extreme left wing progressive instances on this website (there is a lot) but it didn’t let me, hopefully in a future patch I can block all lgtbq++ premium content and leave it just for you guys to read and comment on, then you won’t have to suffer with me like I do you :(

                Thanks again for letting me know you dislike my viewpoints, this means very little to me though as I’m aware that you dislike my viewpoints, you may not believe this but I disagree with some of your viewpoints as well! I just don’t go around literally posting that I’m rolling my eyes as you guys seem to do quite often?