• dx1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Turns out “move fast and break things” doesn’t work that well in the auto industry

  • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    103
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    the automaker said it’s providing a free software update to fix the problem.

    I know it has to be called a recall, but they really should find another name for these things now that OTA SW updates for issues are a thing, not only for Tesla but also other manufacturers.

    • tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      102
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      Nah I like the term recall. Just because the fix is “easy” doesn’t mean the product wasn’t broken. Automakers should take the software in their cars seriously especially the ones that market their cars like a cell phone.

      • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Broken software shouldn’t be accepted as much as it is. Especially in safety critical systems like cars, especially when they remove manual controls for things like steering, brakes, hand brakes and door handles. Fly/drive by wire is more dangerous when the software is unreliable. Mechanical linkages fail immediately or take a long time. Bad software fails in uncertain and potentially chaotic ways.

      • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        I just think it’s useful to have different words for things that can be easily fixed without having to go get the car to a mechanic and having no immediate safety impact, and things that may require you to take the vehicle to a mechanic ASAP because there is immediate serious danger. They should not be in the same category, and people should be aware that they require different levels of attention and urgency. When it’s all just referred to as a “recall”, people will start to not take them seriously when they more often than not are minor things like this.

        • Nougat@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          5 days ago

          I think a “recall” has a very specific legal definition, where the manufacturer has strictly defined responsibilities (identifying and notifying owners of affected vehicles would be one of those). It wouldn’t surprise me if there was some external agency that acted as an auditor on that.

          On the other hand, manufacturers can put out a “service action” bulletin, where a particular repair is free to the vehicle owner, but none of those recall responsibilities are in place. This means that, for example, vehicle owners are not notified, so you just need to bring your vehicle in with the complaint specified in the service action. In this case, the vehicle owner might need to point out that there’s a service action, because a shady dealer will pretend it doesn’t exist, charge you for the repair, and also submit the repair to the manufacturer for reimbursement. This was a lot easier to do before the internet, since the information about that service action wasn’t readily available to the public.

          • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            A recall implies the product is irreparably damaged, or too expensive to repair, and needs to be returned/replaced.

            This framing benefits corporations, because the average recall is relatively minimal and inconsequential, the public will grow to consider “recalls” as normal instead of “potentially deadly failure/defect”, and make it easier for corporate sociopaths like Space Karen to scream gubberment overreach. The wording should reflect the risk to life/public health (e.g. potential to cause harm/death) as well as the cost to repair/replace (quantify the severity of the failure/defect).

            The greater the access and granularity consumers have to this type of data, the greater the benefit to society. Any corporation, politician or lobby group arguing otherwise is your enemy.

            • Nougat@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              5 days ago

              A recall implies the product is irreparably damaged, or too expensive to repair, and needs to be returned/replaced.

              No, it does not. I can’t think of an automotive recall that wasn’t repaired and resulted in a buyback. I’m sure there was one or two, I just can’t think of them. Edit: Here’s the list. And most of those have to do with bad welds or badly adhering paint (which affects windshields in collisions).

              Lots of cars from all manufacturers end up with recalls that get fixed as a matter of course.

          • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            5 days ago

            Tesla owners are not notified as such when the recalls are fixed by SW updates, they just get an update pushed to the car and a request in the car that there is an update ready to install.

            • Nougat@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              5 days ago

              Maybe that counts as the notification? I’ve never owned a car that does OTA shit. All the recalls that have applied to any of my cars have been mailed to me directly, sometimes even well before they are even able to be repaired, waiting on parts availability.

              • atrielienz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 days ago

                They absolutely do have to notify people of mandatory recalls and it’s not even up to the company. This person does not know what they are talking about. There’s a difference between a mandatory recall (mandated by the NHTSA/Government), and a voluntary one. Every other car manufacture sends out information to their customers about mandatory recalls (yes, even software updates, yes, even when they’re OTA fixes). Tesla isn’t special. They still have to comply with the law.

        • kameecoding@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          It’s not useful at all, knowing which brand sells shitty cars that have major issues is a good thing, this whole attitude that you can do OTA fix something therefore it’s fine and we can ship bad product is fucking ridiculous attitude to a multi-ton weapon capable of killing multiple people

          • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            It’s worse than that, people will argue shipping good code is impossible. Good testing is hard, so it’s avoided for things like unit tests. Something that’s only equivalent to basic QA in manufacturing. Every software functions is a design change and the system needs to be fully validated and tested. That’s means driving the car, and not shipping the code and using the users cars to prove your design.

        • Soup@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          The problem is, and of course when it matters I forget the specifics, that there are many times when language is changed to soften how bad something is and it results in people not taking things seriously.

          The issue here is cars being shipped in a broken state, that’s it. They recall the vehicles and force people to skip out of work or whatever to get this shit done because their products suck, and if they wanted to not deal with that then maybe they should products that don’t suck. They can also collect a bunch of these issues, seeing as they’re common, and either make a patch of several minor issues or just say that the problem will be addressed at the next service. This is entirely on the companies to save their image, not us to change our language to make them feel better.

      • Petter1@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        But recall meaning you call the products back, so they can be fixed, or not? This seems not the case here, just a safety relevant bugfix…

    • mrnarwall@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      As a software engineer, I would think to call this a patch or a hotfix. I agree that recall for this type of situation is a bit too dramatic, but I’d also say that patch or hotfix are too casual sounding

    • ascense@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Seems to me just specifying that it’s a software recall would be a good balance.

    • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yes absolutely. The term recall is supposed to be when they literally recall the cars, like bring them back in, in the same context as you recall your dog after he runs around the yard.
      No cars are being brought back in. No dealers are involved here. It’s just a bug fix for the next software release.

      I also don’t like how the ability to fix bugs is creating a huge number of ‘recalls’. For example, last year Tesla had a ‘recall’ because NHTSA decided the warning icons on the dashboard screen weren’t big enough. Like the icons for parking brake and seat belt. Which is frustrating because the car is operated for years with the original icons and nobody had a complaint.

      But if this was an old style car, where those were individual LEDs silkscreened in an instrument cluster, that would never be a recall because it would cost millions to replace every single instrument cluster on every single car. But because it is remotely fixable, it becomes a recall.

      • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 days ago

        They sold a bad product that needs fixed, bad software shouldn’t get an exception. The warning icons were probably not compliant and should never have left the factory.

        • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          The warning icons were the exact same size as the car I had before that. No recall on that car, and if anything icons were even easier to see because the contrast was higher and they are closer to your face.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        They applied that font/icon change in Canada as well, and then Canada made them undo the change that NHSTA demanded. Double recall lol.

        • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Which IMHO just shows that the recall in the first place was just NHTSA unnecessarily flexing on them

          • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            Well, I think rules are rules, and they do differ country to country, but this whole recall for something like that is what the problem is.

            Bu nothing geneartes headlines like Tesla recalls every vehicle made in NA.

            • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Rules are rules of course. But when the car was approved for sale, approved as being rule following, and then retroactively after the fact, after it’s been out for years with literally millions of units on the road, suddenly it’s no good…, that doesn’t seem like fair enforcement to me.

      • atrielienz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        You would absolutely take your vehicle in for service for a safety recall if the OTA didn’t work. Which happens frequently enough that it still warrants being called a recall and the necessary steps once the vehicles are “recalled” in order to notify customers who might not otherwise set themselves up to get an OTA. It’s not as simple as the car “just does it overnight” in every case.

        • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Frequent software updates are part of having a Tesla. If the vehicle is unable to do a software update, then it is broken and would require service regardless of the recall.

          • atrielienz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            My dude, the vehicle could be working fine but you could live somewhere with no broadband and poor 4G connection and not be able to receive the update. Don’t assume that you just know how everyone who owns one of these cars lives their life because that’s not helpful to the conversation, and it’s not how the government functions. The government has to assume that if a recall for safety or security is being issued that people may not be able to receive that OTA over the air and may be required to go to a service center for it instead.

            Almost all new cars have OTA software updates. If one of them breaks something and then the car can’t get further updates, what then? You’ve never had a software update mess with your computer? Are you for real right now?

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Guys, rail against the things that are true. There are enough of them that we don’t need to exaggerate or make up new ones.

        Regardless of what you think of Tesla, “recall” here doesn’t mean what people expect it to mean.

        • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          Sorry we don’t think like that anymore. Nuance and multiple truths are a waste of time. Elon supports a Republican that means he is bad and everything he does is bad and everything he has ever done is bad and he has no vision or leadership of his own he is just a rich asshole using Daddy’s money to buy cars and rockets and Twitter. Thus he is unworthy of praise for anything at all that he has done since he was born into a life of luxury and anything he touches is automatically shit worthy of being canceled or outlawed.

    • variaatio@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      The fix is simple correct informative headlining from media “Tesla issues over the air update to resolve X thing related safety recall affecting X amount of customer vehicles”

      It’s not NHTSA’s fault media does their job badly.

  • SelfProgrammed@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    Every time there’s a recall, I remember the equation from Fight Club and how the company has to make a decision to recall or absorb the costs. Tesla has had A LOT of recalls mostly with the cyber truck. Musk doesn’t seem like the kind of person to be cautious and recall to be on the safe side.

    So… What AREN’T they recalling?

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Tesla may have figured out how SpaceX deals with the muskrat. They basically have a team of people that run interference with tons of busywork they shove in his face when he visits, so that he can’t actually do anything.

      If Trump’s people have half a brain, they will talk to the people that give the British rich and powerful the run around.

        • Zron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          5 days ago

          You think a billionaire that spends most of his “very busy” schedule tweeting nonsense cares to read the news?

          There’s probably a dedicated intern that gives him daily briefings while Musk scrolls twitter for a new Nazi to retweet. The intern knows better than to upset the Muskrat, and keeps news about Tesla issues to a minimum.

        • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          He curates his input and surrounds himself with sycophants to give him the skewed view of reality that he prefers.

    • atrielienz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Recalls aren’t just something that magically happen. Usually there’s an investigation (by the NHTSA, or the company themselves). That investigation concludes that a recall is warranted or necessary and, in the case of voluntary recalls they do a cost to benefit analysis (like how Ford did when the Pinto was a bomb just waiting to be rear ended, and they realized they would save money by not recalling them).

      But the NHTSA does force quite a few car manufacturers to do mandatory recalls regardless of whether they want to or not, usually to do with health and safety. You know. To prevent the Ford Pinto scenario.

      So it’s not so much what they aren’t recalling (although I’m sure there’s quite a lot). The real question should be, why do they have so many recalls? Why aren’t they fixing the problems before they public gets a hold of these vehicles. And it’s not just Tesla we should be asking that question of.

    • meco03211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 days ago

      For this kind of recall, the expense can be insanely low. It’s just a software update that can be done over the air. Something that would warrant a recall is the type of thing they would fix for future builds. So they already put money into it to update the software for future builds. Just pushing it to older builds is simple. Ergo the part of the formula for “the cost of doing the recall” is, as previously mentioned, insanely low. This makes it very easy to have that cost be lower than the amount to settle out of court.

  • firepenny@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I’m still not sure why people buy this pos strapped to wheels? The quality is sub par at best.

    • atrielienz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Cool factor I think. Tech enthusiasts who wanted a car full of tech. The funny thing is automotive is having a tough time building quality vehicles recently across the board. The pandemic only seems to have exacerbated the problem but the trend is that even experienced car manufacturers are having recalls up the whazoo.

  • tk1ll3r@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    If Elon’s DOGE department is as efficient and top-notch in terms of quality, I think the US is on its way to golden times. amirite

  • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Why the cybertruck picture? They aren’t trying to say that there were already 700.000 crappy tin boxes in the wild, or are they? 😉

    • kamenLady.@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      The article isn’t really clear, it doesn’t exactly name the vehicles affected. But only mentions & shows the cybertruck.

      • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        The article isn’t really clear, it doesn’t exactly name the vehicles affected.

        Yeah. But of course we know that so many cybertrucks have never been built.

        only mentions & shows the cybertruck.

        Here I am still wondering:

        Was it a fanboi who was thinking because cybertruck is the latest model it deserves to dominate all the news and so on?

        Or was the author smugly adding this news about a big mistake to their biggest failure in general?

      • anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 days ago

        Gotta isolate the bad press to the obvious turd even though I bet they all have a similar system with similar flaws