• neomachino@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 minutes ago

    I don’t think think I’ll ever “retire” in the traditional sense.

    My thought was to always have a severe mental breakdown around 50 and run off to the woods to build a log cabin and grow my own food. My wife knows of this plan but I’m pretty sure she thinks it’s a joke. It’s not.

  • BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Nope because I’ll never afford it. I’ll be at my desk on the phone listening to my BPD patient scream in my ear for the millionth time that she absolutely must come off the medication she needs to stay alive that she’s been on for 20 years because it’s giving her a rash (not possible and shes doing this for attention), and I’ll quietly expire into an exhausted puddle.

    Edited to add: I have an excellent pension but it still won’t be enough. I have zero savings thanks to my SO wrecking my finances.

  • drexy_rexy@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I started maxing my Roth Ira out when I was earning $10/hr. Avoid spending money on things that don’t literally matter and save for the things that do. Pay attention to where every single dollar/pound/Euro/shekel goes. Stay out of debt. Keep drug/alcohol use reasonable. Most of the time folks who are concerned about retiring/money have no idea how much they spend on what. Saving for retirement is easy once you start doing it and get used to it, but you need to start early and you need to invest in the stock market. Avoiding chronic illness or accidents or long periods where you aren’t earning income are probably necessary too. Staying out of legal trouble is probably necessary as well.

    • Epzillon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      33 minutes ago

      Yes, as a Swede I’d say we have way greater chances of reaching retirement, but it still comes down to saving by yourself if you want to live reasonably while retired.

      I set myself a “spending budget” every month. After salary comes in i move what goes to bills and such expenses into a separate account. I divide whats left into 50/50, one half into savings the other to leisure. My savings account is set up to make long term investment into stock groups managed by the bank (unsure if there’s an english word for this, we håll them “fonder”). Usually i dont spend all the leisure money either way because i rarely purchase things and whats left when next months salary comes around also goes into savings.

      I’ve been blessed by my parentes to start off with some savings so saving by myself once i started working was also allt easier.

      To properly secure your future you need to earn enough money to even be able to start saving. Truly a “society” moment.

  • josefo@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I enjoy working in my field, but as other commenter said, I have no interest on working until death for shareholders to be happy. I do plan to work until I’m dead, incapable or just tired, but I’m planning to enjoy it while it lasts.

    Independence for me would be not having to respond to a higher up, just me, my craft, and peaceful money earned by not overstressing my ass. I’m building my own house now, after I have a place to live without rent, I have no more ambitions than eating, sleeping and be with my loved ones. I don’t need to overwork my ass to death to get that. Maybe 4 hours a day, or two-three days a week should be enough.

    I think most people would do the same if they could, most people like working, they just despise the oppression of this rigged system.

  • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I intend to. I refuse to die in old age, wasting my life working to support shareholders. Have a good few decades left to even be close to that though and I hate it.

  • Perhapsjustsniffit@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    Never took the blue pill in the first place. I worked to live only, not lived to work. Then Cancer retired me permanently at 42.

  • grasshopper_mouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Nope, never. My retirement plan is a ditch with a nice view of the Rockies in Colorado and a bottle of gin on a cold winter night. Everything I’ve saved into (SS, TSP, retirement accounts) will inevitably disappear before I can access them/hit the age requirements. I don’t trust the system at all (I didn’t trust it before the election outcome either). I’m fucked. We’re all fucked. Might as well live it up now while I still can.

  • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Yep, about to turn thirty and have been paying into an Ira, a Roth Ira and a 401k, I want to retire as soon a possible and do things that actually make me happy.

  • Mickey7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Retirement sounds great till you try it. The expression is “even your garage can’t get any cleaner”. This refers to the boredom retirement can be for some. The solution that I found was a part time job, not for the money, but doing something I enjoyed. You no longer have the pressure of a “real” job. The best job that you will ever have is the job that you really don’t need.

    • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Doing stuff is important. But I have enough hobbies that I think I could stop working and not get bored.

    • DigitalDilemma@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Honestly, it scares me a bit. I’ve known men who retired and just… stopped. Sat in their chair, or maybe went for a little shuffling walk. Dead within a few years.

      I could probably retire now, finances wise, but I enjoy my job and don’t know what I’d do all day without some structure.

      • Mickey7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I saw my retired parents waste away in front of the TV every day. As mentioned before … the best job is the one that you don’t need. So besides enjoying my part time “get out of the house” job there are other benefits. I save money and stay healthy by only drinking on Friday and Saturday. These of course are not my work days. I also don’t go out for meals during the week. I have retired neighbors that seem to spend 5 or 6 days a week out for lunch or dinner and boozing everyday. That would never work for me

    • Dyskolos@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Dude, I’m retired for 3 decades and still would need more time and had to prioritise hobbies. I work voluntarily with abused people, but not because I’m bored but because someone needs to. Besides that i love gaming, coding, traveling, cars, boats, going on daily tours with wifey, reading, music, watching star trek…

      But I’ve seen people retire and getting bored to death a week later. I always found that sooo tragically sad, like they were born to be worker-ants and without work there’s nothing left worth living in their lifes.

      But yes, the best job is one you actually want to do and are not forced to do.

  • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    My workplace has a defined benefit pension and they announced that all employees will be losing this pension (even those who are a couple years from retirement).

    We will be switched over to a defined contribution pension and our previous contributions will be converted retroactively.

    I don’t foresee this new pension lasting more than 5 years before they cut it completely. I wouldn’t even be surprised if they’re able to keep our pension contributions retroactively, fucking everyone over.

  • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    No.

    Existence had grown exponentially more expensive in my lifetime, well outpacing what a 401k or pension will realistically ever be able to achieve. At best, it might buy me 5-10 years after I am physically unable to work; if I mentally decline too soon due to age (quite likely in my family), I will die in poverty.

    That isn’t even touching on the possibility of a habitable climate or war, and assumes the survival of the current economic system.

  • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Yep. My wife and I are in our thirties and have good whole life insurance policies that will supplement our retirement accounts nicely in our old age. I’ve been paying into mine for almost two decades (maybe longer, my parents started it for me and locked in good rates when I was young), my wife’s is newer. We also both have matching retirement accounts and are making sure we hit our matching totals each paycheck to draw as much from our employers as we can.

    It’s not ideal, but with good planning (and stable income) you can still do well. Now, stable income is the important part. I’m a software developer, my wife works for a non-profit, so my income is generally a bit more stable than hers.

    I recommend finding a financial advisor. Our life insurance guy is great and because he gets commission on the life insurance plans he doesn’t charge us for advisory services (and also doesn’t try to sell us on other stuff, he actually recommended we NOT move our old 401ks from other jobs over to him because we’d end up paying him more than we’d make, he recommended we roll them into our current employer plans).

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      23 hours ago

      That advice seems like a red flag. There are way more options to diversify investments in an IRA than a 401k, you can also invest in the same funds through an IRA that are available to your 401k. Either way you end up paying fees to someone as well.

      • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Oh sure, he’s not saying don’t diversify. That was specifically about the small amounts from previous employers. Like, I had worked at a place for about a year, and the amount in that account wouldn’t be worth him taking over.

  • Jourei@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I’m barely into my 30’s so it’s far too early to say what I’ll be doing. I aim to be debt free within 10 years and have no major life goals after that. Another 10 years and pension should cover my living costs 1:1, so monetarily I should be fine.