• gnuhaut@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Q: Are the airstrikes in Yemen working?

    THE PRESIDENT: Well, when you say “working,” are they stopping the Houthis? No. Are they going to continue? Yes.

      • agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        And do you intend to deal with the fallout of their new plan the same way, creating more new plans from them? Or is there an end goal?

      • Crikeste@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Typical blood thirsty, racist and uneducated American thinking. Color me surprised.

      • homura1650@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        And is that working? It sounds like their old plan is still running.

        The Houthis are not new at this. They have been the target of literally thousands of airstrikes by Saudi Arabia, but have continued to operate.

        The US is not new at this either. It has decades of experience loosing to much less technically capable forces fighting on their home turf. If history is anything to go by, this is simply not a fight the US military (or any modern military for that matter) is capable of winning.

        • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          They’ve apparently been gaining ground since the coup but I don’t think that’s the case as of the past couple of weeks. Either way anything they’ve won has been through violence and intimidation and not the consent of the people. The people voted and rejected Houthis bullshit twice, elections in which many Houthis refused to participate.

  • dan42O@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    10 months ago

    What ever happened to talking and reaching an agreement and asking for favors and scratching each other back… like now we resort to uncivilized behavior by attacking the poorest countries.

    • CybranM@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      47
      ·
      10 months ago

      I don’t think there’s much negotiating with a terrorist organization indiscriminately attacking international shipping

      • gastationsushi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        10 months ago

        They’ve been clear from the start, they will leave the freight alone once the genecide in Gaza stops.

        Joe Biden and Bibi are the ones who won’t negotiate.

      • dan42O@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        Out of curiosity why did YOU use the word terrorist? Have you ever heard of the movie Avatar, Star Wars, Space Balls? It’s simply too easy to label someone a threat/terrorist, but come on entire countries, like are you agreeing that each creature/living breathing mammal as a terrorist?

      • rgb3x3@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        10 months ago

        “Hey, do you want you and your families to stop suffering from a lack of food, clean water, healthcare, and housing? We can fix that.”

        Might be a start. But it’s never approached that way.

        People don’t usually want to be terrorists. The places these people come from are the poorest on earth and don’t know anything other than suffering and exploitation.

        • JillyB@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Their flag says “death to America, death to Israel, curse be upon the Jews”. In some sense, I think you can’t blame an oppressed group for radicalizing in an attempt to improve their situation. But it’s hard to sympathize with a militant, anti-semitic terrorist organization.

          Personally, I think the US should end the Prosperity Guardian operation. It should end support for Israel. And it should end oil imports. This will push America more towards decarbonization while reducing America’s interest in the Middle East. But that will raise gas prices, so it’ll never happen.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        The only terrorist organization here is the “coalition” that the burger empire scraped together. Yemen is interdicting shipping from countries supporting a literal genocide through their sovereign waters. Meanwhile, the terrorists from US and UK are bombing Yemen for this.

  • WebTheWitted@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Years of Saudi air strikes with US weapons systems ended in a victory for the Houthis. Not to mention causing one of the worst humanitarian situations of the 21st century.

    WTF does the US think it’s gonna do other than escalate the situation (and continue the next record breaking humanitarian crisis)?

    • Crikeste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      I stand with anyone doing their part to pressure the US and Israel in ending their genocide. ❤️

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      If you stand with the Yemeni government then you want the Houthis gone.

      Can you even find Yemen on a map.

      • تحريرها كلها ممكن@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago
        1. Ansar Allah are the legitimate government of Yemen. Anyone who suggests otherwise is delusional.
        2. Not only can I find it, I live directly to the north of it (Saudi Arabia). عاش اليمن الشقيق.
        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Being excited about things doesn’t make them real. You’ll understand that after the tenth or twentieth disappointment.

          • تحريرها كلها ممكن@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Yemen has already won, the US has been fighting it since 2004, all that’s left is for the US to understand it lost. Though I predict its crazy politicians will keep repeating their mistakes expecting a different outcome.

            • Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              American soldiers definitely lose. Civilians definitely lose. Americans and their military industrial complex have definitely been treating the middle East as a training ground for 2+ decades.

  • The Cooking Senpai@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    10 months ago

    The recent US and UK actions can be taken as examples on how to cure the symptom while making the disease worse

    • BB69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      41
      ·
      10 months ago

      Here’s an idea:

      The Houthi’s can just not launch missiles at ships

      • Melkath@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        10 months ago

        I’m tired of this kind of lazy rhetoric.

        Why are the Houthi’s committing violence?

        I have a feeling it has less to do with a foundational nature of evil, and everything to do with a population being impoverished, oppressed, and forgotten.

        Instead of spending 1.2 billion dollars bombing them, maybe purchasing 600 million dollars of their chief export would be a better idea.

        Empower the legitimate businesses and the people in the region who aren’t launching missiles instead of ravaging the region and creating a new generation of ‘militant rebels’.

        • sevenapples@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I have a feeling it has less to do with a foundational nature of evil, and everything to do with a population being impoverished, oppressed, and forgotten.

          Instead of trusting your feelings and alluding that the Houthis launch missiles “because they’re forgotten”, you could list the actual reason they’ve given, which is enforcing a blockade against ships trading with Israel.

          Given that statement, I’m sure that the Houthis will stop their strikes when Israel stops their ongoing genocide. The US could have their shipping lanes back if they stop funding and arming a genocide and force a permanent ceasefire.

          • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            This what? These people are religious fanatics so self absorbed in superstition and nonsense that they will literally blow themselves up and kill a bunch of people just out having breakfast because they don’t like the hours of operation one group sets for a pile of rocks some other group wants to visit on one day but not on another day. It is their utter lack of empathy and rationality that makes them evil pieces of shit. They aren’t fucking freedom fighters standing up for innocent people. They are morons who want religious control over their own people and every other person, absolute male domination of women in society, minority rule, and the ethnic cleansing of Jewish people from the middleeast.

            With the support of useful idiots as you, of course.

        • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          The Houthi are the Proud Boys of Yemen.

          After 1/6, instead of arresting the insurrectionists, maybe we should have bought more Proud Boys merchandise? That’s your solution to religious extremists attempting to overthrow the government?

          • Melkath@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            Yemen’s chief export is Proud Boys merch?

            Didn’t know that.

            Thanks for informing me and not just being a murderous troll.

            If that’s the case, just nuke Yemen. Explosives are the only real fix for social issues.

            • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              I was comparing religious extremists in the US who attempted to overthrow the US government with the Houthi who are doing the same in Yemen. The Houthi aren’t the official Yemen government. They are a religious faction who are attempting to overthrow the Yemeni government.

              • Melkath@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                Then why did you take my point, employ and empower legitimate Yemen businesses and buy their chief export, flip it around, and say that I was suggesting buying Proud Boy’s merch?

                • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Sorry, I interpreted it as supporting the Houthi. That is buy Houthi products from Houthi businesses.

                  You didn’t say Yemeni in your reply.

        • Szymon@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Spending 1.2 billion on bombing campaigns keeps 1.2 billion in the American economy. Giving another country 600 million only exports money from their grasp.

          Peace is not the point of the war machine.

          • Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Me when i label the people i don’t like as terrorists so I don’t have to think about the conflict and can bomb their entire country to dust while feeling good about myself

            • ComradeChairmanKGB@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Me when i label the American military as terrorists so I don’t have to think about the conflict and can bomb their entire country to dust while feeling good about myself

              This but unironically

          • Melkath@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I want to stop murdering bad people and I want to start rewarding good people.

            Nowhere did I suggest giving the bad people money.

            Watch a man get strong and push thugs out when he has a dollar to defend.

                • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  I have compassion for the little girl that wants to learn math, not the religious fanatics that would shoot you for teaching her. You can be compassionate for terrorists if you want. Honestly you should move there and join their cause, if you think they’re so great.

      • The Cooking Senpai@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Good idea! Here’s another: UK and US stop interferring in middle east (FYI the palestine problem was worsened by magnitudes by the UK mandate)

        • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Yeah let’s just set back and let be bunch of theocratic authoritarians hell bent on developing nuclear weapons and cleansing the middle east of Christians and Jews.

          I have a better idea. How about we isolate them into little spots of desert nobody cares about and if they poke their heads out and threaten their neighbors, we bomb the shit out of them until they figure out that they are the baddies, while the rest of the world moves forward without them?

          Maybe you’re right. Maybe we should just say a bunch of inch deep non sequitors and nonsense like “fyi the Palestine problem was worsened by the west.” That will totally not result in another world war and tens of millions of dead, tens of millions of refugees, and the worst humanitarian crisis in the history of the planet. And let’s do it all in the name of humanitarianism!

          How about no.

      • BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        Actually they can’t, they have a legal obligation under the UN Convention on Genocide to take extra-territorial actions in order to stop or prevent genocide. They are acting within international law. The ships going to Israel despite the active genocide are violating international law and complicit in the genocide themselves.

        • BB69@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          10 months ago

          How do the Houthis know which ships are going to Israel? Can you prove they’ve only attacked ships bound for Israel?

          Why is there a 39 nation coalition organizing against the Houthis? Aren’t a lot of those nations opposing Israel’s current actions?

          Do you know the Houthis slogan of, “Death to America, Death to Israel, Death to the Jews, Victory to Islam”?

          You’re fighting for the wrong side buddy

          • Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            All ships relevant to this discussion are required to have an AIS transmitter and destination is one of the pieces of data they transmit. This is like asking “how do you know where that plane passing overhead is going?” to someone who has flightradar24 open.

          • NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Oh I wonder why that may be their message? Maybe because those two have a long history in the middle east in destabilizing it and killing innocent people? Do you honestly believe they hate us because they hate our freedom? Unbelievable.

            • BB69@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Unbelievable that you defend those attacking random supply ships.

              If they’re innocent, why is there a coalition formed against them?

              • NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                10 months ago

                So your logic is if there is a collation formed against someone then they’re bad? What about the axis powers during WW2? They had a coalition against some countries does that mean those countries are bad??

                • BB69@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  There were significantly less nations allied in the axis than what formed against them.

                  Nice try tho

      • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        They will, just as soon as those ships stop violating their blockade. You will note that many ships pass through Yemeni waters without issue because they are abiding by the rules, as dictates by maritime law and international law. Why are you defending the criminals?

        • feannag@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          10 months ago

          The ships they’re firing upon are passing through in accordance with maritime and international law. Their justification is that the ships are Israeli affiliated, but those ships are still sailing in recognized international waters.

          • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Oh shit! International law?? Man, I bet everyone totally respects stuff like that-- especially the very very moral nations like the US and Israel.

          • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            No, they aren’t, because a blockade has been announced and the ships are violating the blockade.

            • feannag@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              10 months ago

              You can’t just “announce” a blockade and make it your territorial waters. You can absolutely create a blockade if you choose to, but it is a recognized act of war. There’s a separate conversation to whether that is a just action or not, tied in with the war in Israel/Palestine. But that doesn’t change the fact that a blockade in itself is an act of war.

                • feannag@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  The Bab-el-Mandeb Strait - which the UN has stated is a strait to which transit passage applies. Yemen is a signatory country to the UN convention on the law of the sea. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bab-el-Mandeb

                  Transit Passage https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/part3.htm#:~:text=and hydrographical characteristics.-,2.,or an exclusive economic zone.

                  Specifically, article 38 states:

                  ~~Right of transit passage

                  1. In straits referred to in article 37, all ships and aircraft enjoy the right of transit passage, which shall not be impeded; except that, if the strait is formed by an island of a State bordering the strait and its mainland, transit passage shall not apply if there exists seaward of the island a route through the high seas or through an exclusive economic zone of similar convenience with respect to navigational and hydrographical characteristics.

                  2. Transit passage means the exercise in accordance with this Part of the freedom of navigation and overflight solely for the purpose of continuous and expeditious transit of the strait between one part of the high seas or an exclusive economic zone and another part of the high seas or an exclusive economic zone. However, the requirement of continuous and expeditious transit does not preclude passage through the strait for the purpose of entering, leaving or returning from a State bordering the strait, subject to the conditions of entry to that State.

                  3. Any activity which is not an exercise of the right of transit passage through a strait remains subject to the other applicable provisions of this Convention.~~*

  • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I wonder if treating the Houthis as Iranian agents and retaliating against Iranian assets directly would be more effective than playing whack-a-mole against these missile launchers without addressing the source of the problem. I assume Biden’s advisors are wondering the same thing, but it’s hard to know where the line between deterrence and escalation is…

    Iran has enemies. Many of them are even worse than the Iranians, but maybe the thing to do is to find some sympathetic group, arm them, and let them take the heat, just like Iran is doing with the Houthis…

    • MataVatnik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Houthis have been getting bombed by Saudi Arabia for I don’t know how many years. If any one thinks that airstrikes will stop their operations then I have a bridge to sell them.

    • gnuhaut@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      but maybe the thing to do is to find some sympathetic group, arm them, and let them take the heat

      Hmm. I wonder if anyone has tried that yet?

      Sympathetic guys armed by the US to fuck with Iran include Saddam Hussein, ISIS and Israel.

      • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        I don’t think it’s technically correct to say that the US armed ISIS; ISIS seized weapons that the US provided to Iraq.

        Israel does a pretty good job of opposing Iran, and we can be confident that weapons provided to Israel aren’t going to be used against the US. I think it’s likely that the Houthis are acting up now not because they’re provoked by Israel but because Israel is preoccupied with something else.

        As for Saddam Hussein… He did a very good job of opposing Iran. The threat of eight years of war and hundreds of thousands of Iranian soldiers dead would be a very effective stick if we still had access to it. It’s ironic that the weak, pro-Iran government that is the result of US intervention in Iraq seems like it’s worse for US interests than Saddam was.

        • A lot of the people that now sympathize with ISIS are people that the US and other Western countries propped up in various ways to help fight the Soviets.

          The Houthis were friendly with the Soviets. The Soviets were friendly with the imamate.

        • bartolomeo@suppo.fi
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          It’s ironic that the weak, pro-Iran government that is the result of US intervention in Iraq seems like it’s worse for US interests than Saddam was.

          Nailed it! (Aside from thinking it’s ironic)

        • gnuhaut@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          a very effective stick if we still had access to it

          We? Who is ‘we’?

  • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    This needs to be said. USA needs to be done towards the same things that USA did to Japan in 1945. It needs to happen once, and they will never dare to step a military foot outside their borders ever again.

    • chayleaf@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      The nuclear attack on Japan wasn’t intended to defeat them - they were already essentially defeated, just trying to find a more favorable way to lose. The nuclear attack’s purpose was to intimidate the USSR, as a power flex. The reason nuclear weapons are a deterrent isn’t because a couple of nukes hitting your country is a problem - that’s just a minor inconvenience when it comes to war. The reason nuclear weapons are a deterrent is because the countries that do have them have a lot of them, and can destroy not just a couple important cities, but cover your entire country in radioactive waste.

      Not only will your “plan” not achieve its goal, but it will also hurt hundreds of thousands, possibly millions of civilians. I know it’s popular to associate a people with a government, and that’s not completely baseless, but - and I can’t believe I have to say this - that’s absolutely no reason to launch a nuclear attack. That’s just genocidal nonsense. There’s a reason countries at war don’t kill civilians, and it’s not “good will”.

      • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        So do you think the nukes did not kill people in Japan, or set them back a few decades? The purpose of such a neutraliser should be to stop USA from ever doing what they keep doing overseas – genocide and economic/psychological enslavement.

    • Knoxvomica@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Do you actually think America wouldn’t go absolutely ape trying to find who nuked them? Do you not remember 911 when the whole country collectively lost it’s mind?

      • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        You realise the whole world has well prepared nuclear armed countries at this point, unlike back then? USA always tends to calculate optimally the most amount of enemy damage while taking the least amount. If USA attempts to attack others, they will get wiped off earth very easily without a speck of dust remaining. Even North Korea would be enough theoretically.

        The thing is, the non-Anglo world is tired of NATO terrorism/colonialism going on for centuries, and will probably explode at some point in the very near future. And the alternative hegemony and systems are pretty much in place with BRICS+ being much more powerful than G7/NATO powers, demonstrably with all the NATO weaponry failures in Ukraine.