Discord announced on Monday that it’s rolling out age verification on its platform globally starting next month, when it will automatically set all users’ accounts to a “teen-appropriate” experience unless they demonstrate that they’re adults.

Users who aren’t verified as adults will not be able to access age-restricted servers and channels, won’t be able to speak in Discord’s livestream-like “stage” channels, and will see content filters for any content Discord detects as graphic or sensitive. They will also get warning prompts for friend requests from potentially unfamiliar users, and DMs from unfamiliar users will be automatically filtered into a separate inbox.

Direct messages and servers that are not age-restricted will continue to function normally, but users won’t be able to send messages or view content in an age-restricted server until they complete the age check process, even if it’s a server they were part of before age verification rolled out. Savannah Badalich, Discord’s global head of product policy, said in an interview with The Verge that those servers will be “obfuscated” with a black screen until the user verifies they’re an adult. Users also won’t be able to join any new age-restricted servers without verifying their age.

      • PumaStoleMyBluff@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        13 hours ago

        They are but getting a normie friend to join a service called Stoat feels like a non-starter. Revolt/Matrix/Element/Signal are more doable.

          • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            It makes perfect sense. Names are incredibly important to widespread adoption. As are pleasing colors.

            Many people don’t know what a Stoat is, or that it’s an animal. A meaningless nonsense word (In the mind of a normie) will not drive them to use it.

            • ToTheGraveMyLove@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              10 hours ago

              So your argument is that people are stupid so they should change the name. That’s not very compelling imo. Most tech names are nonsense to average person, yet they succeeded just fine.

              • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 hours ago

                It’s not a question of intelligence, it’s a question of recognition and partiality.

                That’s not very compelling imo.

                That explains why nobody has consulted you before launching a brand.

                Most tech names are nonsense to average person, yet they succeeded just fine.

                On the contrary, most successful tech names are very recognizable and attractive to the average person, and the ones that weren’t were less likely to succeed. Facebook, Twitter, InstaGram, Windows, Apple, Amazon, Snapchat, TikTok all are very recognizable words or portmanteaus of descriptive words that are attractive to average users and are meant to convey a specific emotion or feeling. Meanwhile it’s been years since Twitter changed its name to X and yet nobody calls it that, and everybody still calls posts on that platform “Tweets”.

                Like, this billion dollar industry doesn’t cease to be so because you personally don’t find it compelling lol.

                  • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    9 hours ago

                    It is not. Stoats are not a very commonly talked about animal species. Their name isn’t even consistent across regions.

                    I had to look up what a Stoat even was because I only know them as Ermine, and in North America it’s called a short tailed Weasel. It’s not an animal you’re likely to even see much as they are rarely kept in captivity, and aren’t something you’re very likely to see in the wild in NA even though they’re native here. They have precious little pop culture representation either.

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          This game is such a fucking fun romp.

          I like that it has a “secret” ending that if you actually wait around in the waiting room instead of leaving, eventually the Mayor will be ready to see you. I think it’s about 15 minutes.

          • I’ve watched so many streamers play it that idk if I’d wanna play it myself, but that I didn’t know! I love how much love they put into the game as a whole. Never fails to get me a bunch of hearty laughs…

    • paequ2@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Eh, the more you say it, the more normal it’ll sound. Stoat. Like oat. Or like stoked.

      “Goo Gewl” isn’t exactly a good name…