Yeah I hate Rowlings antics as much as the next lemming, but I’ll never understand why posts like these have no references. I don’t even take them seriously, the burden of proof is on the poster, not the reader.
Every claim should come with a direct link or reference.
Thanks for saying that! Was reading it and obviously not a fan of either named people, IMHO public death penalty should be brought back for preventing the course of justice! But wild accusations and click bait.
She’s denying it, but Steve Bannon denied knowing anything, when he worked directly with Epstein on a propaganda piece to get people to forget that he was a child sex trafficker. Rowling also just had her super yacht removed from all marine traffic services, no AIS, no port logs, nothing.
But TLDR, numbers 1, 3, and 4 have just been found in the Epstein files.
Personally inviting Ep to the show is refuted by her, and several news reports say it’s a fake. But in the Ep papers, there is correspondence of her team and his team working out tickets for someone. An invite did happen to someone on his team. I suspect the invite was a wide dump to the aristocrats and someone did take those tickets.
For aid in the legal expenses of white supremacists, she donated to a lot of filthy causes. No question. This happened. But the wording insinuates more than the blind payments.
Best I can tell, the things are true or kind of true, but didn’t go down exactly the way they’re worded here. No question, she is awful, keeps ties to awful people, and funds awful causes, but the wording here is chosen carefully to enrage the readers and create engagement.
The simple truth behind all of this was and is awful, but it’s become boring. You can only write journalistic things about her dumpster fire so many times, so they’re trying to come up with new angles to keep it interesting. I’m not sure that I disagree with it, honestly. Even if it’s a little underhanded, keeping her in the awful spotlight is probalby worth it.
I hate to be that person, is there a source for each bit of info? This is def something I’d like to come back to in future references.
Yeah I hate Rowlings antics as much as the next lemming, but I’ll never understand why posts like these have no references. I don’t even take them seriously, the burden of proof is on the poster, not the reader.
Every claim should come with a direct link or reference.
Thanks for saying that! Was reading it and obviously not a fan of either named people, IMHO public death penalty should be brought back for preventing the course of justice! But wild accusations and click bait.
https://www.edinburghlive.co.uk/news/edinburgh-news/edinburghs-jk-rowling-hits-back-33355200
Some news sources have picked it up.
She’s denying it, but Steve Bannon denied knowing anything, when he worked directly with Epstein on a propaganda piece to get people to forget that he was a child sex trafficker. Rowling also just had her super yacht removed from all marine traffic services, no AIS, no port logs, nothing.
But TLDR, numbers 1, 3, and 4 have just been found in the Epstein files.
The others are also verifiable.
I looked at a couple, short on time today.
Personally inviting Ep to the show is refuted by her, and several news reports say it’s a fake. But in the Ep papers, there is correspondence of her team and his team working out tickets for someone. An invite did happen to someone on his team. I suspect the invite was a wide dump to the aristocrats and someone did take those tickets.
For aid in the legal expenses of white supremacists, she donated to a lot of filthy causes. No question. This happened. But the wording insinuates more than the blind payments.
Best I can tell, the things are true or kind of true, but didn’t go down exactly the way they’re worded here. No question, she is awful, keeps ties to awful people, and funds awful causes, but the wording here is chosen carefully to enrage the readers and create engagement.
The simple truth behind all of this was and is awful, but it’s become boring. You can only write journalistic things about her dumpster fire so many times, so they’re trying to come up with new angles to keep it interesting. I’m not sure that I disagree with it, honestly. Even if it’s a little underhanded, keeping her in the awful spotlight is probalby worth it.