• SendMePhotos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    8 hours ago

    That was the plan. That’s (I’m guessing) why the search results have slowly yet noticeably degraded since Ai has been consumer level.

    They WANT you to use Ai so they can cater the answers. (tin foil hat)

    I really do believe that though. Call me a conspiracy theorist but damn it, it fits.

    • RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      It’s not that wild of a conspiracy theory. Hard to get definite proof though because you would have to compare actual search results from the past with the results of the same search from today, and we unfortunately can’t travel back in time.

      But there are indicators for your theory to be true:

      • It’s evident that in UI design the top area of the screen is the most valuable. AI results are always shown there. So we know that selling AI is of utmost importance to Google.
      • The Google search algorithm was altered quite often over the years, these “rollouts” are publicly available information, and a lot of people have written about the changes as soon as they happened.
      • Page ranking fueled a whole industry which was called SEO (Search Engine Optimization). A lot of effort went into understanding how google ranks its results. This was of course done with a different goal in mind but the conclusions from this field can be used to determine if and how search results got worse over time
      • It’s an established fact that companies benefit from users never leaving the company’s ecosystem. Google as an example tried to prevent a clickthrough to the actual websites in the past, with technologies like AMP or by displaying snippets.
      • If users rely on the AI output Google can effectively achieve this: the user is not leaving the page and Google has full control over what content the user sees.

      Now, all of the points listed above can be proven. If you put all of that together it seems at least highly likely that your “conspiracy theory” is in fact true.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        30 minutes ago

        I’d argue that SEO was one of the biggests causes of search result degradation and consider any complaints coming from them as highly suspect due to conflicting interests. Eg, a change that makes it harder to game the search engine algorithms is good for searchers but bad for SEOs.

        I hope the whole industry dies (or already is? I don’t hear much about it these days lol). They are just marketers whose whole job is to get you to look at their shit instead of the most relevant results.

        • RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          22 minutes ago

          Yeah, I think SEO is pretty much dead by now, and probably because web search as we knew it is kind of dead as well. You’ll probably need to spend ad money if you want visibility. But I’m no expert on SEO and I could be wrong.

    • Womble@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Search results have been degrading for a lot longer than LLMs have been a thing. Peak usefulness for them was around a decade ago.

    • msage@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 hours ago

      They WANT you to use Ai so they can cater the answers sell you ads and stop you from using the internet.