• rumschlumpel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    214
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    TBH asking questions on SO (and most similar platforms) fucking sucks, no surprise that users jump at the first opportunity at getting answers another way.

    • slate@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      236
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Removed. Someone else already said this before. Also, please ensure you stick to the stlye guides next time, and be less ambiguous. SO could mean a plethora of things.

      • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        104
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago
        Spoiler

        last time this question was answered was for several years older software versions, and the old solutions don’t work anymore. Whoops!

            • comador @lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              Shivers…

              I remember when I signed up for SO and was immediately put off by the fact you couldn’t post a conversation asking for help until you had helped others out AND gotten enough positive points.

              I still did it, but damn their moderation system is ass.

              • amateurcrastinator@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                Ah yes the famous: you need to add more details, may e a picture but you need to have above 100 reputation before you can add a picture or edit your question

          • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 days ago

            In a video covering the toxicity of Stackoverflow, it was found ot at least some of the admins are also extremely toxic on other sites, in that same exact manner.

    • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      2 days ago

      I will never forget the time I posted a question about why something wasn’t working as I expected, with a minimal example (≈ 10 lines of python, no external libraries) and a description of the expected behaviour and observed behaviour.

      The first three-ish replies I got were instant comments that this in fact does work like I would expect, and that the observed behaviour I described wasn’t what the code would produce. A day later, some highly-rated user made a friendly note that I had a typo that just happened to trigger this very unexpected error.

      Basically, I was thrashed by the first replies, when the people replying hadn’t even run the code. It felt extremely good to be able to reply to them that they were asshats for saying that the code didn’t do what I said it did when they hadn’t even run it.

      • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I do understand being rigorous about questions, and technical forums were even worse a lot of the time, but SO’s methods led to the site becoming severely outdated. They really should have introduced a mechanism to mark old content as outdated. It should have been obvious like 10 years ago that solutions often stop working come next major version of the programming language, framework or operating system.