• CombatWombatEsq@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    I’m pretty sure I agree with this take? I do think it’s your civic duty to be familiar with every major story that passes through the 24 hour news cycle. The lie the news media tells is that the best way to do that is to check headlines every 6.8 seconds, when in reality reading a few articles (although you do have to click through and read the whole story) from a reputable source every 1-3 days will leave you much better informed than someone who looks at headline’s constantly.

    • hornywarthogfart@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I would agree with you on the civic duty part if the news was just the news but it has morphed into a amalgamation of ragebait, social media content, and updates so granular to be worthless and just noise. Even the “good” sources of news do this. RSS feeds are nice but not a viable solution to the average person.

      At a concept level I think you are right that a well informed population is better. I just don’t think our current handling of news and journalism is at a spot where that is even possible without a ton of extra work (hence this thread).

      Choosing a level of engagement that prevents you from turning into a screaming asshole is key and unfortunately that level varies from person to person.