• Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I think there is a balance to be made. Some anti capitalist measures are needed to encourage innovation. But the use of patent laws as a defence, or copyright to seek excessive rent are far too aggressive.

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      If there is any chance of reform it would have to still appeal to all parties. We definitely need to think about solutions that have not been proposed before.

      As much as I would like to advocate for abolishment of IP, I recognize it is an unrealistic demand.

      After all, IP didn’t magically appear. It took hundreds of years of court cases and laws passed to get to the arguably ridiculous point we are now.

      • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I like the idea of having to pay a fee to retain copyright. And that fee doubles every year.

        It starts off low but after a decade or two it becomes more economical to let the copyright lapse.

        Patents should be scrapped completely.

        • Doomsider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Oh, I like that because it puts a ever increasing burden to use it or lose it. Once it is no longer profitable it goes back to public domain.

          I find patents of dubious value to say the least. It is definitely the worst part of IP.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        If there is any chance of reform it would have to still appeal to all parties.

        There’s nothing such as change that appeals to all parties; that is not how that works. Change, good or bad, is forced by one segment of society over another, doubly so when it’s against the interests of the ultra-rich. Don’t compromise in advance.