• Zacryon@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Naive question from a european: Aren’t there companies on the market who can offer a cheaper price and therefore beat greedy competitors?

    • fullsquare@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      the problem is that there is natural (as in, unmodified) cheap generic insulin available, it’s just that it sucks compared to everything else. you see, insulin is a peptide that is supposed to appear, do some signalling, then disappear and unmodified insulin copies this thing exactly. the problem is, most of the time when peptide is supposed to work as a pharmaceutical, you don’t want to do that, you’d like insulin to last longer than usual, which means changes to it that make breakdown slower, or adding something that makes it stick to albumin, which has similar effect because it hides insulin somewhere enzymes can’t reach it and also it makes it start acting slower. this means less frequent dosing and less changes in insulin activity over time. there are also other insulins that start acting faster than natural, and this is also due to a couple of modifications in its structure

      for another example, ozempic was not the first drug in its class, it’s also a modified peptide, and it can be injected s.c. once a week, compared to previous iteration (liraglutide) that requires daily injections. if natural peptide is injected i.m. instead, its halflife is half an hour, and in serum it’s only two minutes (it gets released a bit slower than it is metabolized)

      manufacturing costs are about the same for any variant, most of it is in purification. patents for a couple of these have expired anyway by now, but if manufacturing is limited then price can be set arbitrarily high (see daraprim)

    • Soulg@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Correct, but when it’s already been established that people will pay those prices, they keep them high. So instead of going from $800 to $5 out of the goodness of their hearts, they go from $800 to $650 (number made up) to get more business but still make massive profits.

      • Ice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        56 minutes ago

        A lot of the benefits people associate with capitalism require a free market. The US problem is that the megacorps have gotten sufficiently powerful to abolish that free market through regularory (and legal) capture, enabling entrenched monopolies.

      • Banana@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Doesn’t work when people don’t get to choose not to take it when it gets too expensive! That thing that capitalists always forget about: necessities.

        • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Every time someone talks about you being supposedly free to choose where to work they should get instant diarrhea. Let alone medicine of course, that’s a hard dependence.

          Nobody is truly free without proper UBI and free healthcare and good public transport. Only then true freedom can exist.

    • hakase@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yup, but their products don’t work as well, don’t work for everyone, or have other downsides. Banting’s original insulin would be dirt cheap today, but it’s shit compared to what we have now, so the best products on the market today charge a premium for either efficacy or convenience.