• Pup Biru@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    that’s like saying that human life is a far larger goal than physics

    you can’t just hand wave it away because you deem human life to be “worth it”. it exists and it’s a real problem, and it’s a complex problem even with unlimited money

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      21 hours ago

      that’s like saying that human life is a far larger goal than physics

      no, it’s not. it’s literally saying saving a human life is a larger goal than logistics.

      you can’t just hand wave it away because you deem human life to be “worth it”.

      I can, because it is. If we don’t try everything to save a life and simply shrug the responsibility with the excuse of “sorry, but it’s just not logistically possible to save this person”, then what’s the point saving anyone?

      it exists and it’s a real problem, and it’s a complex problem even with unlimited money

      I think I see what happened here. you only read part of this chain. you clearly missed the part where I said,

      if we can’t bring the aid to the people, let’s bring the people to the aid

      logistics is a tool used to solve problems. stop using it as an excuse to let people die.

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        human life is a larger goal than logistics.

        logistics isn’t a goal; it’s problem that you have to solve to achieve a goal

        If we don’t try everything to save a life

        human life does have a value cap: would you plunge the world into borderline starvation in order to save a single life? no? well then a single human life is worth less than the happiness of the entire human race… the bar is somewhere above that

        you’re trivialising a lot of complex things… public health has similar questions where the value of life and health is measured in aggregate

        sorry, but it’s just not logistically possible to save this person

        literally what happens every day in public health… resources are not unlimited, and so you have to make choices and trade offs

        you only read part of this chain

        nope i read the whole thing, its just that

        if we can’t bring the aid to the people, let’s bring the people to the aid

        is still a logistics problem… public transport is a logistics problem, shipping is a logistics problem, air schedules are a tiny part of the air travel logistics problem

        moving people and things to where they need to be at the time that they’re needed is logistics

        logistics is a tool used to solve problems. stop using it as an excuse to let people die.

        logistics is a problem space that you need to solve before you achieve outcomes: it comes before, not after and you can’t start without solving logistics problems

        in terms of distribution of medicine and aid, it’s basically the only problem that needs solving: we have plenty of food, we have plenty of medicine, and not for profits aren’t wanting for these things… they’re wanting for ways to get it where it’s needed