The Wall Street Journal warns that the investigation into the Nord Stream pipeline explosions “threatens to fracture support for Ukraine.”

German investigators reportedly believe Kiev was behind the sabotage, specifically pointing to former Ukrainian commander-in-chief Valery Zaluzhny.

According to WSJ sources, an elite Ukrainian military unit carried out the attacks under Zaluzhny’s direct supervision, aiming to deprive Russia of energy revenues and weaken its economic ties with Germany.

The article recalls that suspects have already been detained across Europe and warns of serious fallout if a German trial against Ukrainian nationals begins. Such proceedings could further strain relations with Germany which is Ukraine’s top financial donor and key arms supplier, particularly of air defense systems.

Political pressure is also mounting on Merz, though his circle believes the issue can still be contained domestically. German society, sources say, has largely accepted that Kiev was responsible.

However, WSJ notes, the diplomatic consequences would be far easier for Berlin if investigators hadn’t gathered such compelling evidence against Ukraine.

  • huf [he/him]@hexbear.net
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    yeah, they made the world better by increasing the price of fuel in europe. this is a win for uh…?

    i suppose increased suffering on europe is a net good, but still.

    • Corridor8031@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      10 hours ago

      i suppose increased suffering on europe is a net good, but still.

      Get the help you need

      • huf [he/him]@hexbear.net
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        you’re the one who thinks it’s a good thing ukraine and the US did a terrorism on infrastructure.

        but do explain how this made the world better. please.

        • Corridor8031@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          10 hours ago

          well it is another incentive for companys, the goverment and the people to not use gas.

          which might future strengthen/ pushes them to use green alternatives.

          also it is also a strategical reminder how centralised infrastructure is in danger, which might push green alternative, which is more dencentralised, further.

          and i said probably. I think the short term issues get balanced by the long term effects.

          • huf [he/him]@hexbear.net
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            10 hours ago

            that might be true if the response was to 1) buy solar tech from china and 2) re-invest in european renewable energy manufacturing

            but instead, they joined a stupid trade war with china and pivoted to buying gas from 1) russia but more expensive, because it goes through intermediaries and 2) the US, also more expensive.