• chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Municipal development guy here.

      You’d be amazed how many contractors and architects have issues with stair math.

  • Lemminary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I thought they meant movie stars and meant you could only get near them by becoming an engineer. I’m… not that smart at certain hours of the day.

  • Pearl@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    19 hours ago

    And then Kerbal Space Program too had to go be a cash grab.

    At least we have kitty space program

      • MBech@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I love KSP 1,but it has gotten a bit stale with the years and playtime. I was 3 days from buying KSP2 when they shut down, lucky me.

  • 鳳凰院 凶真 (Hououin Kyouma)@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Eh, I remember just googling space stuff and absorbing info and that alone had enough dopamine. My world was so small before I got access to the internet, when I was a kid, I had a children’s book about science stuff, stars, but they barely had much info. Internet access was so magical. Unlimited information.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    yes, astronomy, astrophysics, if yuo dont have knack in that field you wont get into it. physics, if you cant pass simple CComunity level physics classes(for scientists, not for life sciences), you wont pass upper division physics.

  • xxce2AAb@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 day ago

    That or the right job application and a lot of propellant and oxidizer - but seriously, don’t do that. It didn’t end well for Icarus. Gravitationally-driven open-core fusion reactors are best admired from a safe minimum distance.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 day ago

      lot of propellant and oxidizer

      You can only realistically get close to one of them that way.

      You are better off studying plasma containment fusion. And that’s a fuckton of math.

      • xxce2AAb@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        Oh no. You can get close to any star of your choosing with only minuscule amounts of reaction mass if you start out in vacuum away from significant gravity wells - eventually. Granted, the star in question may or may not have gone supernova or collapsed into a black hole by the time you arrive, but I doubt that’ll make a lot of difference to the person doing it at that point.

        With that said, I’m not about to discourage anybody from taking an interest in fusion of the up-close-and-personal-kind. And if people aren’t into the math of Magnetohydrodynamics? Well, first off, sucks to be them, but second: Then donate to the cause to pay those who are. Fusion is fucking awesome, and we desperately need it.

      • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Even fusion constrains you to the limits of the rocket equation. Laser sails on the other hand, could let you put the bulk of your propulsion system in orbit of the sun or something where you don’t have to carry it with you.

  • JillyB@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    I interpreted this to mean that you need to learn a lot of math in order to have a career in astronomy. I don’t think OP thought it was possible to actually go to the star and math was the limiting factor.

    • icelimit@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Only if you weight by mass. Or orbit. Or volume.

      Welp I guess on average we’re all deep fried.

  • stray@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    If you learn just a little bit of math you can realize that no one else is getting anywhere near them either.

    • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Next year, Voyager I will have traveled 1 light day. It will also be over 49 years old at that time. Think about that for a moment. Almost 50 years to travel the time it takes light to travel in a single day. Our closest star is Proxima Centauri at 4.25 light years away. To reach Proxima Centauri, Voyager I would need to travel ~77,500 years. Voyager 1 is one of the fastest man-made objects in existence and it would take far longer than the entire history of civilization to arrive.

      Space is big.