• notabot@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    14 hours ago

    This is the sort of silly law I can actually get behind, so long as they didn’t spend long on it. It adds a bit of local flavor, and has a positive motive.

  • Visstix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I like the “legally” part implying that you will get a ticket for insisting it is a planet.

  • Deadeyegai@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Illinoian here to provide additional context.

    In 2009, the Illinois State Senate passed a resolution to return Pluto to its planetary status, partly in honor of its discoverer, Clyde Tombaugh, who was from Streator, Illinois. The resolution was a response to the IAU’s 2006 vote that reclassified Pluto as a dwarf planet.

    Ill. Senate declares Pluto a planet | https://abc7chicago.com/archive/6695131/

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        14 hours ago

        The mindset of “wah, science is wrong and bad because it changed its mind about something I learned about as a child” is not harmless, it’s how we end up with anti-vaxxers in charge of the CDC

        • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          I’ve directly heard the argument from creationists of “they were wrong about Pluto being a planet, why would they be right about evolution?” Yeah, misunderstanding how all this works does matter.

      • Leon@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        It’s not so much this case in particular, but the idea of it and what it represents. Pluto being a dwarf planet or not is really just an astronomical categorisation, and that’s where the usefulness starts and ends. You won’t go to jail for calling it a planet, even though it doesn’t meet the standards.

        The idea of using legislation on such an irrelevant thing is what rankles me. It’s frivolous and could be harmful. Perhaps not in this particular case, but legislating away expert opinion because it doesn’t fit with your personal narrative is a problem.

        Right now it’s a planet, but this shit happens with peoples lives as well.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Pluto is, and always will be, a planet. That Tyson guy just got a bunch of his friends to agree with him about Pluto not being a planet so he could further his career with shock and awe, and lots of talk show spots. Talk show spots are where the real money is, not science. He’s a genius (but wrong about Pluto).

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 hours ago

      He’s not a genuis, he’s smart but very arrogant, he’s intolerable when you get him next to an actual subject matter expert

      But he is right about Pluto. We either would need to add a half dozen+ more planets, or demote one into a new category. And Pluto would currently be in the bottom of that category - it’s barely large enough to fit in the new category, so it’s not a matter of where to draw the line

      And in his words, if Pluto was between us and the sun it would grow a tail, and that’s no type of behavior for a planet to have