Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 20 hours agoInspirationallemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up1348arrow-down17
arrow-up1341arrow-down1imageInspirationallemmy.dbzer0.comStamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 20 hours agomessage-square28fedilink
minus-squarezxqwas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22·20 hours agoIn a frictionless vaccuum 45° would be max range.
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·19 hours agoYeah you actually want a bit less then that.
minus-squareOoops@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·edit-217 hours agoUnless you use modern artillery. Then you want to aim even higher because at those ranges/heights it’s beneficial to reach less dense air layers quickly.
In a frictionless vaccuum 45° would be max range.
Yeah you actually want a bit less then that.
Unless you use modern artillery. Then you want to aim even higher because at those ranges/heights it’s beneficial to reach less dense air layers quickly.