• gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    it’s a play with conditional probability:

    By asking the question (of whether the universe exists), that is already reason enough to know the answer. As such, you could say that asking the question is causal to knowing the answer. And the answer is that the universe exists.

    So, asking questions causes the universe to exist, in some sense.

    • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Maybe I’m just not smart enough to understand.

      What you are saying certainly answers that the universe does exist (or at least we perceive it to) but how does that answer the why? If i can ask the question then the universe does exist. Great. But why?

      • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        why has two different meanings. You can ask “why did something happen” and expect a causal explanation, i.e. event B happened because event A happened earlier, or you can ask it like “why is this happening”, like “what is the purpose in it”. does that make sense to you?

        • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 minutes ago

          Yes, but neither is what you are answering. Or i just don’t get how that answers it.

          You are telling me this answers the question “does the universe exist” but i am asking why there is anything there in the first place so that the universe can exist. Why is there a medium for the fabric of space and time to exist within. There could have just been nothing.

          I understand that there is. And we are here. But thats not my question and i don’t think your answering that question.