• tburkhol@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    18 days ago

    That gap is the 5-14 year olds, and they mostly die from machinery accidents, septicemia, and “other” unspecified diseases. Not sure what makes the so resilient to car crashes. They’re apparently too young to participate in gun violence (the actual number is 0.02 per 100,000), and in some happy range where they’ve survived the infant/perinatal cancers, but juvenile cancers haven’t had time to be fatal yet.

    • peoplebeproblems@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      Car crashes is almost certainly due to the regulations on car safety - particularly that none of them are sitting in the front seat or driver, and young people in general have an easier time recovering from any injury.

      • cabbage@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        I wonder if this includes people who are hit by a car without sitting inside of one.

        • tburkhol@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          The tables include deaths from “Other pedal cyclist” and “Other pedestrian” which sound to me like cyclists/pedestrians killed by other than motor vehicle, so my guess is: yes, “Motor vehicle traffic” probably does include people killed by cars without sitting inside one.

          • cabbage@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            17 days ago

            Interesting, thanks. I must admit I briefly misread the plot, and was confused why numbers were so low for those under 18, but I got it mixed up with the heart disease line… Oops.

            But then I don’t really see the puzzle for kids aged 5-14 at all. Half the group is too young to play near traffic, and instead stays home or in playgrounds. They don’t have a driver’s license and they largely sit in the back seat. And they are less likely to be out and about in the evening and nighttime when the drunk drivers get out on the roads. And they very rarely drive motorcycles, and I suspect folks with kids in the car are less likely to drive drunk or speed.

            • tburkhol@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              17 days ago

              I had a column misalignment issue where the 5-14 were zero for both guns and cars (and 10% for ‘machinery’). Lower than other age groups does make a lot of sense, but actually zero…I should have double checked that before posting. You probably didn’t misread the plot: Lemmy lets you edit the posted graphics, so I did :)