Not beautiful. More “interesting data set.” Source: https://wonder.cdc.gov/ucd-icd10-expanded.html
edited to correct off-by-one error in 5-14 year old column
Not beautiful. More “interesting data set.” Source: https://wonder.cdc.gov/ucd-icd10-expanded.html
edited to correct off-by-one error in 5-14 year old column
Interesting, thanks. I must admit I briefly misread the plot, and was confused why numbers were so low for those under 18, but I got it mixed up with the heart disease line… Oops.
But then I don’t really see the puzzle for kids aged 5-14 at all. Half the group is too young to play near traffic, and instead stays home or in playgrounds. They don’t have a driver’s license and they largely sit in the back seat. And they are less likely to be out and about in the evening and nighttime when the drunk drivers get out on the roads. And they very rarely drive motorcycles, and I suspect folks with kids in the car are less likely to drive drunk or speed.
I had a column misalignment issue where the 5-14 were zero for both guns and cars (and 10% for ‘machinery’). Lower than other age groups does make a lot of sense, but actually zero…I should have double checked that before posting. You probably didn’t misread the plot: Lemmy lets you edit the posted graphics, so I did :)
So I can trust my eyes! Thanks!