

Source on the first statement?
Source on the first statement?
It hasn’t, it’s just that good opsec is impossible in the long run and everyone is bound to be deanonymized eventually. For example, if you’re using a clean account on a CP sharing forum, it’s possible to track your mannerisms and post history (content, timezone, etc) to get an estimate of where you live. Then they can subpoena the ISPs for IP traffic in that region and figure out who is using Tor. That subset of IPs may then be cross referenced with the time that suspect’s account posted, that can be used as probable cause for a warrant… That sort of stuff. Sounds super complicated but most of it can be automated and bypassed these days (I don’t think you actually need to subpoena for example).
Where did the suspect fail? He should have used multiple accounts, spaced out the interactions more randomly, used stolen WiFi, ran his comments through a translator and back, etc. At no point did Tor fail at securing his IP address end to end
How will any system fjx this, though? There will always be disasters, hunger, war, crime…
There’s something to be said about choosing not to care about some stuff, though. Being constantly contemplating every single crisis in the world and worrying equally about them all will be damaging to your mental health… And these days there are more pressing issues than the moths to me. It’s not that I don’t value them
True but a downvote magnet on Lemmy. But I would dispute the “benefit” part… What exactly is the benefit in not having to learn anything? Why would I even want to exist if not to be good at something and create something? It just seems like we’re building towards stuff that’s better than us at doing what WE want to do as a society. Thinking about chess here: why would I care about the best Stockfish moves in every line of my favorite opening if no one will ever be able to explain them?
Honestly, just erase all graded homework, papers included. All of it. It wasn’t even good at anything to begin with and we would just cheat off each other, but now it’s even worse.
At work and in tests you’ll be using bloomberg terminals, risk software, etc only available on Windows, so why bother?
Unviable for economics and finance in my experience. Excel is absolutely mandatory for these
Damn, that’s a high bar to clear. Almost none of the distros I know pass their criteria
I’m not trying to be mean, but I didn’t really understand much of that. Can you translate from your native language on DeepL or something?
Can someone clue me in to why Mint wouldn’t be “libre”? What does “libre” mean in this context exactly?
They can and most of the time they do complain about free apps
The main reason why I use open source is precisely because I don’t need or want to worry about this crap. The software is as much property of humanity as it is of the creator, it is basically just knowledge
The green part gets further to the right the more gifted the author of the diagram is :)
I am so sorry that happened, people can be really mean to us autistic folk for no good reason
I just decided not to play games that cutthroat with mine
How isn’t it possible? Just don’t give them phones, it’s not that complicated
I’ve gotten better at saying please and thank you often, I guess
League was the reason I stalled so long, too, but honestly, Riot is just as bad as Microsoft. Vanguard is unacceptable and we should make our voices heard by not playing their games anymore. There are so many great games running just fine on Linux, nowadays I don’t even feel like I’m restricted at all
I’m not judging (that much) but you can do pretty well with just telescope, undo-tree and the LSP stuff, no? Debuggers can make it very bloated, at that point I’d just fire up a real IDE just for debugging and get back to Vim to program