The problem is that kent is a bullshitter and acted like he doesnt get what a feature freeze is. If he cant communicate with linus as to why his patch is actually bugfix then he cant contribute to the kernel.

Nb4 a “bug” causes that setting to be true for all users just like with the cambridge analitica scandal

Their school has their own fully-permissive license!
They are seemingly conceding that their school is inferior to MIT at producing licenses.

I wish I knew lol

I cant beleive they use the MIT license…

Linux pride flag

Ponzi Schemes work by having new investors pay off old investors.

I remember searching “control panel” and it brings up a brazilian cafe

Imagine the guy at BMW who invented subscriptions for heated seats teaming up with the guy at nvidia who does drivers and youll understand why I wouldnt

Treat em like structs

And theyre probably feeding your harddrive to an AI while pretending they dont know anything

You might DM too much because you think youre the master of the universe. Im assuming you were homeschooled by flatearthers, and thats cool you had a good experiance but that doesnt mean other people didnt have bad ones.

There definately good reasons to allow making judgement calls, but I wouldnt be complaining if that all they use that freedom for.

Most of the time if you asked for some exception they would allow you to drop the class without issue. So they wont break the rubric to make the class easier, but they will to make the class harder. And thats what I take issue with.

On one of my finals the professor said “you all did too well on the midterm, so I changed the final to be on meaningless details in the reading to test your comprehension and only your final grades matter” so we could fail despite learing everything we set out to learn.

I had an engineering ethics professor tell me I could I turn in the first assignment late on the second day of class, but after the final she said my grade was entirely dependant on the first assignment and it was late so I got zero points and failed the class. They have a quota of students to fail and they just pick people to fail and come up with bullshit after. They use their unchecked liberties to screw the students out of their money and nothing more in my experience.

This is whats wrong with the world, people will come out of the woods and defend the most batshit insane things…

Why would they need to change how the class is graded after you took the class? The asnwer is simply to fuck you out of money. There is no educational purpose, just a monetary one.

Just because its reguarly done does not mean it should be normalized.

What would you do if your boss said the purpose of your salary is not to show you how much you will make by the end of the year, but to motivate you to work, and then doesnt pay you for months of work… would you have the same naive outlook?

Yeah, I had teachers change the rubric on the day of the final and even after and the deans at UCSB didnt care at all. Teachers can do just about anything under the guise of education…

An those IP laws are really fostering innovation!

Im sure DOGE will replace it with a more efficient way for the government to track all of the bugs its computers might be vulnerable to…

Dear purchasers of proprietary bullshit: STOP!

I was testing you =P

Maybe next time just say you have two electrons in your covalent shell