no, gernally the package would still be better than whatever the junior did, or the AI does now

Thing is, that “trivial question asking” is part of what causes this phenomenon

She didn’t call herself a libertarian and explicitly said she isn’t

And North Korea calls its self democratic. Yet we don’t call it a democracy. No, we define these categories by what they are/do/believe in/etc… and like it or not, Ayn Rand’s Objectivism is 100% a component of libertarian ideology, Ayn Rand’s beliefs are very much a core component of Libertarianism, and i’m sorry to inform you that many on that list of yours ARE libertarians, such as Milei. In the same way the Marx&Hegel were a cornerstone of communism.

But you are correct about Zelenskyy, he is not libertarian.

Bullshit. You might also want to think who’s “we” and what externalia does giving that “we” an ability to “put limits on these things” possess.

Standard Libertarian response that basically ignores the existence of anything outside the individual

Also, from the person who you believe isn’t a Libertarian: The source of the government’s authority is “the consent of the governed.” This means that the government is not the ruler, but the servant or agent of the citizens; it means that the government as such has no rights except the rights delegated to it by the citizens for a specific purpose. -Ayn Rand, Galt’s Speech.

A government is large scale organized violence and warlords. Spoken just like Rand herself! “Only a government holds that power. The nature of governmental action is: coercive action. The nature of political power is: the power to force obedience under threat of physical injury—the threat of property expropriation, imprisonment, or death.” The Virtue of Selfishness “The Nature of Government,” The Virtue of Selfishness, again Ayn Rand.

Lastly, on privatization: https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257%2Fjep.20.3.187

I find it interesting, so many proponents of Libertarianism don’t realize that the limits we put on these things they want to exist to stop people from creating neo-feudal fiefdoms.

Yes, Ayn Rand IS a Libertarian, yes the end result of Libertarianism is a government that is too weak to oppose any organized violence.

If a government is too weak to stop large scale organized violence you get warlords, of some form, in the modern case it’s whoever has the most wealth to found the largest private army.

But hey, your not too far off the mark with the whole Nazi bit, after all the word Privatize was invented to describe what the Nazis did with state property.

No, the Current U.S. Government along with the Uber rich backing don’t want to be China, they want to Collapse America and bring about a “libertarian Utopia” where you have an uncountable collection of private kingdoms owned by whoever has the money to run the “private security” of these areas.

They looked at the company towns of the 1800s and saw a moral good, and like basically everything thy do, they have openly claimed as such, but everyone ignores it, just like project 2025 in the USA, The Leaked AFD papers in Germany, the UK Leavers, etc…

oh yay, a techno dystopia, just wait for the repo men after you miss your heart payment

even worse, it’s a joke, but it’s true, the proof of concept is often also the final product

you realize that even the “cheap” Chinese cars from BYD and the like are still more than many people can pay for a car, there is no used EV market

I mean, that’s assuming you can afford an electric car, being poor is expensive

but the BILD owned magazine so nicely spread the propaganda

why would market electricity prices have any relation to what you pay on your power bill? turns out that companies will charge whatever they know they can, regardless of the cost of acquiring something to sell, should the cost of something be more than they know they can sell it for, they just won’t sell it.

The idea that market prices influence what you pay for something is basically one of the main lies of supply side economics.

can you fit his cock any deeper?

not like it was actually reported on

No, in fact he then came out and called for Ukraine to surrender, has actively used Starlink at the behest of Putin, while yes keeping in contact with Putin, openly repeated the Russian blood and soil propaganda calling Krima “Khrushchev’s mistake”, and of course as we later learned SpaceX was indeed under orders off the pentagon, making these sanctions irrelevant, not that is stopped SpaceX from selling to Russia anyway, and of course the Pentagon taking over control of Starlink above Ukraine to make sure Musk couldn’t pull this shit again.

quite frankly, the only reason the man is not behind bars is that he has too much power, and too much lobbying

lol, no one cares if people start asking questions. like, I’m sorry, but that’s not how this shit works. what, you think people are going to rise up against the system or some shit like that?

The only time anything like that happens is when the very few who have actual power decide something needs to happen, and those are the very same people who don’t care, or even are glad the guy is gone.

I swear, everyone confuses living in a democracy with the powers in charge actually giving a crap for some reason.

why would anyone bother paying them off? they own the media, you think anyone will care about what the examiners say when no one hears about it?

that is the worst excuse I have ever heard

IDK, maybe that whole thing where he likes to selectively turn off Starlink, or maybe that time he literally went to visit Putin and then spouted some Russian Blood and soil?

they may be friendly with the notion of communism, but apparently don’t know much about communist ideology, because according to dialectical materialism, yes everything is political, from where you work, what you have/use, the food on your plate, and even the thoughts you think are all inherently tied to politics as politics is the ordering of society, and society is a core and indispensable part of the human condition

I guess the idea of material reality isn’t part of communism, good to know.

material conditions mean everything, every action you take, every opportunity you have, every thing you buy, literally all of it, is influenced by politics.

Politics is simply the organization of society, and as a human without society you have nothing, you would have to slave away for years just to make a standard no°2 pencil, and even that is influenced by politics because it takes a society to raise a person.

that’s some literal communist thinking there mate.