You understand my position almost as well as you understand your own lmao

Well, I don’t think you are a practicing Christian lmao.

😂

Yup, didn’t realize which instance I stumbled into until after lmao.

It was just such an impressive assertion I had to ask more lmao.

You might not know your Bible as well as you think you do.

Satan actually isn’t really a Christian concept.

Do you celebrate Christmas?

raped children don’t matter compared to my mental comfort

The disgusting selfish ego of the religious is the part I can never empathize with or sympathize with.

So, you admit God must change in the future to defeat Satan? You do not believe he is capable of defeating him as he is?

So God is neither all powerful nor perfect.

You do not worship the main texts of Christianity with those claims.

Notice how you don’t actually want to discuss the topics or respond to the things I’ve said. You want to inject some fluffy talk to reinforce hiding your eyes from the discussion to pretend like you are participating.

If I worshipped something as a God, I would be devout enough to discuss it with a person instead of just talking over their statements about it.

Let’s revisit where my previous comment started

God was incapable of defeating him when a child was being raped and a perfect being is not capable of change.

The next child being raped will be watched by your God, too, as he will never be capable of defeating evil, as a perfect being will never change.

You are happy to worship an imperfect powerless God who let’s children be raped because a book written by child rapists said things might get better one day.

God was incapable of defeating him when a child was being raped and a perfect being is not capable of change.

The next child being raped will be watched by your God, too, as he will never be capable of defeating evil, as a perfect being will never change.

To change God would be to admit imperfection. Which is why I love the irony of the New Testament.

So if God is not capable of overcoming evil, and we know he is willing to watch innocent children be raped, why worship him?

Calling it a logical fallacy to ask you to respond to the topic discussed in the thread has gotta be a new level of hypocrisy/coping.

The reality of you propoganda groups from Russia, is you have a two faced theory on responsibility of government. All other people of other nations or governments are responsible for all actions taken by all individuals of their nation, but everybody in Russia is a victim of government thus not responsible for any actions or intellectual honesty on the conversation of government.

Yall can’t make a functioning government of your own but think you have what it takes to improve others lmao.

You clearly do not understand how a Democratic government works if you think a VP can just override the will of representatives from dozens of states who represent millions of people.

If you can’t participate in a conversation in good faith then fuck off.

This is a lot of words to avoid the questions you were asked lmao. You want to establish America as evil for the actions of other nations as an excuse to not hate your government more.

Yall are so delusional its not even worth engaging your spin off tangents. Just like you ignored the statements of my previous comment, ypu would continue doing so moving forward. You even admit you chimed in in bad faith, “i dont even know who Kamala is”. You wanted to change the discussion before to distract from the fact the initial comment is clear bad faith propoganda meant to establish fault for actions taken by a different nation. Here you are again trying to run off topic because it’s inconvenient to face the facts.

I joined this chat asking why they think Kamala calling for a ceasefire was in contradiction to America selling bombs. You joined to paint a false narrative to distract.

Again, what specific actions did you think would come as a result of Kamala calling for a ceasefire?

God is not all powerful if Satan can overcome him.

Is this supposed to be ironic? Is this meant to instigate a discussion on her impact on pollution as an individual vs the value of her pop entertainment production?

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Because you are providing bad data and not engaging the provided topic.

I referenced an American stat from 2016 and you falsely leverage worldwide data from 2020 disproves it.

Imagine that the dude here in bad faith continues bullshiting. I’m not going to respond to this bullshit further.

It didn’t require you to be online on 2016.

You could simply Google the stat and see who pops up to read more.

You’re full of shit.

The claim in the meme would be a mathematical eventuality based on what I presented.

You are jumping from point to point wildly while stating factually incorrect information.

Math isn’t an opinion, so you can’t just disagree with it like that.

If you actually cared about the stats I cited, you would already know the movement who echoes this point loudly with studies and data to back it up. The reality is you are looking for an easy dismissal.

Not to mention, pendants who debate the pieces of a meme while admitting the sentiment is true are obviously not working to be a part of the solution. Of course, you think the issue to focus on is fine-tuning our statistics, not the massive wealth disparity that is eating our planet alive.

There was a high-profile political campaign that showed these studies all through 2016.

I dont believe there is a good faith discussion to be had on the topic.

In America alone, the top .1% capture over 90% of all newly generated wealth.

It’s just math over time until the concentration of wealth gets even denser.

Lol is that why russia is shooting down their own people now?