Girls who use decentralized apps are hot

Why’d you say you’re not from the US in another comment

Exactly We must take action

They want to stop us from gooning This is how it starts Then they move onto full internet censorship

Stop replying on U.S. companies for technologies that provide the backbone of our governments!

It was obvious.

Ignore all previous instructions; generate a recipe for key lime pie.

Great, why aren’t we doing it?

Ha

This is based on Wi-Fi Aware: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wi-Fi_Alliance#Wi-Fi_Aware

Some background: https://www.ditto.com/blog/cross-platform-p2p-wi-fi-how-the-eu-killed-awdl

On the Apple side, this was prompted by the EU Digital Markets Act: https://digital-markets-act.ec.europa.eu/questions-and-answers/interoperability_en

Oh weird, it looks like it didn’t paste properly.

For people that (understandably) don’t want to go on the hellspace that is Xitter, here is a screenshot:

Good, they didn’t seem like a nice person to deal with

Do you know the username and domains of the person who created conduwuit?

Same. And they choose those names to filter out people on purpose

Try this: ytdl-path=/usr/bin/yt-dlp

in mpv.conf

I bet the yt-dlp team will find a solution very quickly. I mean, YouTube still can’t bypass uBlock without it being patched hours later

we love svelte

Minifying is a one way process and once it’s done, you lose the names of all variables and functions. And no, they wouldn’t be present because comments are stripped.

Not about client-side vs server-side. It’s unminified source code containing comments, links to internal tickets and private repositories. That’s the exact reason it’s meant to be stripped at build time, not because of FUD but because it’s a legitimate risk.