minus-squareme@social.jlamothe.nettoProgrammer Humor@programming.dev•Monadslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·12 days ago@mEEGal @ZILtoid1991 Honestly, the best way I’ve found to understand monads (if we’re talking Haskell) is to look at the type signatures of its functions. Understanding return, (>>=), and (>>) will essentially tell you everything you need to know. linkfedilink
minus-squareme@social.jlamothe.nettoretrocomputing@lemmy.sdf.org•anyone else doing this?linkfedilinkarrow-up6·9 months ago@TwoBeeSan @dosuser123456 Where does one even buy floppies any more? linkfedilink
me@social.jlamothe.net to retrocomputing@lemmy.sdf.org · 1 year agoUSB Floppy Driveplus-squaremessage-squaremessage-square2fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1message-squareUSB Floppy Driveplus-squareme@social.jlamothe.net to retrocomputing@lemmy.sdf.org · 1 year agomessage-square2fedilink
@mEEGal @ZILtoid1991 Honestly, the best way I’ve found to understand monads (if we’re talking Haskell) is to look at the type signatures of its functions. Understanding
return
,(>>=)
, and(>>)
will essentially tell you everything you need to know.