• 0 Posts
  • 30 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: August 2nd, 2024

help-circle


  • just_an_average_joe@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoScience Memes@mander.xyzwomp womp
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think it is because we humans are not rational.

    In a free market society, over time, every seller would charge for their service as much as they can. And the service they themselves use, will in turn charge them as much as they can.

    This would be an optimal system, if only humans were rational creatures. When prices for a service increase too much, we should stop using it and go for alternatives, which would create more incentives for competition to grow and prices to come down etc.

    But i think, we don’t think rationally. Sometimes, even when we know something is bad for us, we still do it cuz of lack of self control or other reasons.















  • Meta has also released many top tier model to the open source community. To say “meta only oppose openai cuz they wanna create a service of their own” is quite frankely uninformed.

    Meta is the reason so many researchers are able to work and make AI accessible to the everyday people. Without llama models, so much of research would not have been possible cuz openai never release their stuff under the guise of “safety”.

    Openai wants to monopolize and charge us whatever they want. And this going for-profit was part of their plan from the beginning. If only meta had not released their top tier models for absolutely free, openai would have had complete monopoly.

    Also saying for profit structure would allow them to have more fund is like saying having a gun will allow a robber to have more funds.

    The funds will come from consumers, for profit would mean they will have an easier time ripping off the people without too much scrutiny