If moves faster than camera shutter speed, he can technically appear in the same same room on camera. The only sure fire way is to see in person

Yep :)

I’m just a bit too salty about RAM prices

I think there the government is also starting a controversial draft law, basically citizens will be drafted at random, cuz people aren’t interested in dying in foreign land.

There was another case that happened, a kid made fun of a solider who came to their school for recruitment and he made fun of him. So now that kid is being prosecuted (some years of community service) so basically this sets a precedent that you can make fun of others but not military

Edit: i forgot to mention im talking about Germany

You wrote AI bubble bursts twice

Awkward question… does NZ have “australian” wildlife?

Curse the profit maxxing capitalism behind AI, if it wasn’t AI, it would have been something else

Lmao when china does it, its sweatshop labour and when western companies pay their labour pennies its the fault of the workers for being lazy.

I get the feeling if this was a us company, people like you would have been chanting this as a success of capitalism that will increase competition and decrease prices.

Its memory we are talking about, literally everyone in the world already uses it. Its not like crypto or other tech that might become obsolete any time soon.

The profit margins might shrink but there will be emough uses for it for sure. Think of personal clouds, archives, maybe cheaper gpus etc etc.

Maybe we will discover/implement algorithms that exploit memory trade offs once it becomes cheap.

Something happened recentlyish… there was a time when india and US hegemony were politically aligned then russian war happened and India having far far deeper connection with russia, decided to show their loyalty to them.

Historically, USA has been either pro-Pakistan or pro-India because of the steategic location (next to China) and india pakistan fighting all the time.

Right now, its Pakistan’s term to be on “good list”.

I don’t believe there are any “good ones” in openai. I recently learned it was ilya who suggested the “AI is too dangerous” rhetoric to close down openai.

AI as a field has always been about making life better, not making more money. OpenAI has just made this whole thing sour.

And buy 40% of global wafers supply causing spike in RAM prices so others can’t buy it.

I believe it is mentioned under the concept of suht (if im not wrong), another thing that is atrocious in our time are taxes are based on income ie the working class has to pay. Where as, islam preaches wealth tax (in form of zakat) which would work as a good barriers against billionaires. Literally no one needs a billion dollars but somhow it is the norm that billionaires exists and pay little to no taxes but everyone else who do work have to pay ~20-40% in taxes

But it is though… AI was started long before computers were made.

AI at its core means “intelligent behaviour exhibited by non-natural/Artificial means”. This means that if your OS “intelligently” switches tasks on physical threads on cpu that’s AI. If you go to supermarket and the door opens when you go near it, that’s AI as well (actually this example was in our intro to AI textbook).

So computers are a special case of AI, so are calculators.

Machine intelligence and aritificial intelligence are the same thing. AI just changed its meaning too much i guess. What was AI few years ago, is now machine intelligence.

(Somebody correct me if i’m wrong, i know you want to…)

If voting didn’t work, you will blame it on corruption or unprecedented times like war or natural disaster.

Its either democracy or some external thing happened, never that voting didn’t bring democracy.

And we haven’t even touched the subject of legally making it difficult for minority and “unwanted” groups to vote. We also didn’t talk about immigrants who live work and pay taxes but are not represented by voting

Why use float when output is boolean?

Frankly, that’s a stupid ass take.

Reality is not binary, we progress and evolve. The constant pressure to be better than yesterday is the reason we got where we are.

There was a recentish model, qwen next that was advertised as smth that can be run entirely on RAM.

In general I agree with you, but I would refrain from using evolution/DNA example. Because then it leads to ‘social darwinism’.

Evolution does not mean ‘more evolved is better’ but rather ‘more suited to the environment’.

Take psychopathy (or even apthy towards minority groups) as an example, in a capitalist system, psychopathy is more evolved because you get to climb the corporate ladder faster.

But this assumes that capitalism is unchanging, and final form of our society. But in reality, we can change the system. Under socialism or social democracy (with strict laws), psychopathy would no longer be ‘more evolved’.

To be more precise, i was alluding to capitalism