jafr4nz

Still, in our world and with the available knowledge and technical possibilities it’s so easy to manipulate the masses. Blaming individuals for any structural problems and systemic issues is shifting the blame from the real culprits to the comparatively weak individuals whose main fault is looking for an uncomplicated life in a increasingly complex world.

Why not instead blame a system that is fixed on exploiting any and all resources possible (incl. bodily and mental health} to make more money every year (myth of endless growth) or at least greedy companies misusing their influence.

For my part I don’t believe in capitalism, but I think some effective regulation especially of multinational companies might also do the trick, as long as the concentration of money is reduced.

I partly disagree. I think we are already past the point where people were able to change the world by fiscal choices. The answer is already there: the money people own grows slowly if even in some countries, the money circulating altogether grows somewhat steeper thanks to inflation and (war cost) depts, making peoples choice less and less effective and able to change a fuckingthing. I won’t cease trying to find a way though, just to make it a whiney bit more costly to get to me xD Heads up!

Taktisch wählen ist leider auch nicht das goldene vom Ei, wir haben zwar mehr Parteien als Amerika, aber den Status quo Wald Entscheidungsgrundlage für das Wahlverhalten zum nehmen… da bräuchten wir keine Parteienlandschaft mehr.

Holen wir uns lieber eine vernünftige Ersatzstimmenregelung✊

Cool. Die Variante -ens macht zwar auch etwas her, Phettbergs Ansatz wirkt auf mich allerdings noch etwas klarer, und die Historie ist allemal einen Bonus Wert.