

So watching a Australian man review mp3 players will mean what?
So watching a Australian man review mp3 players will mean what?
The bigger problem is trying to get the mainstream that would read an article like that to understand the technical difference between hacking and accessing unsecured data.
I can’t recall the name but I recall a European movie (I saw it on cable television) where celebrities sell their skin to be grown in labs to be sold as meat for people to eat. The main character would go around finding sick celebrities, stealing their DNA and infecting themselves with the same illness.
Remember when Xbox required a Live subscription to use the any streaming entertainment app?
The Matrix
So the universe is a trans allegory?
E Pluribus Anus?
No, that’s character played by James Urbaniak on The Office named Rolf. You’re thinking of Thomas Rolph, cricket player.
We don’t know that they developed space travel and left Earth either.
Spider-Bomb, Spider-Bomb
Does what ever a… AH! GET THAT THE FUCK AWAY FROM ME!
Dude, you should have stopped using Spotify when they let Joe Rogan on their platform… or when they started hosting fake music.
Whelp… I’m going to special hell. At least it is ironic in a good way.
It was restarted in like the last year.
That is only if they catch fire.
But they sold $43 million in 72 hours! /s
Are they still defending the fact they host Stormfront?
I didn’t read the article. I will admit this. I am only reacting to the headline.
No it isn’t but I still refuse to choose on purpose to listen to that song. I don’t even know the name.
EDIT: Just to be clear, I can’t stop from hearing the song out in the wild. However I will not seek it out. I just do not want to hear a song purposefully made with AI in such a manner. I’m still bitter that LOVE won a Grammy over the soundtrack to Across the Universe. They only gave the award to LOVE because George Martin was involved in it.
Says the dude who completed a song using AI.
Yes, DankPods.