after eating a KFC 18 piece spicy bucket.

Lmao, you’re gonna shit yourself regardless of upvotes

This was my first thought: when will we get an arm based framework laptop?

I would immediately leave and get as far away from my home as possible, since that’s where they’re coming to look for me.

There’s a reason that your instance (and others) has defederated from hexbear.

i don’t think hexbear is a good sample group for the average lemmy user nor representative of lemmy users a whole. you might do better sampling lemmy.world, or assembling a meta poll from the top 5 or top 10 instances.

Haiku - based on BeOS

“inspired by” would be more accurate. there’s no original BeOS code in Haiku for legal reasons (other than the interface, which was open-sourced with the release of BeOS 5). All backwards-compatibility with original BeOS software is (impressively) reverse-engineered. Haiku OS is, itself, original software made to - in every way - look, feel, and operate just like BeOS did.

edit: i had a buddy in high school who had a BeBox. it was like having the best of a Mac and a PC in one machine. it really was a spectacular machine and OS. i really wish Apple had picked it up, but they went with NeXTSTEP instead, which, i admit, was still a pretty solid choice.

Imagine how delicious that would be

Mmmm… fried T-Rex drumstick

my cat Holy Lord Emperor Finley the Magnificent and Soft wants to know wtf you mean by “once”?

also suggesting that those beans could have been found in a nebula, dick

“The best part is that when you try to turn it off, Scarlett Johannessen’s voice just laughs at you.”

I’m glad you have a hobby tracking the historical progress of life-extending technology, but I find your entire premise to be a straw man.

I have no concern about them not living long enough. So your magical “maybes” and “it could happens” are completely irrelevant.

You might be arguing against your own comments here when you hit 65 and realize you still maintain mental acuity and are thriving.

I’m not running for office nor scotus. But if I were, I’d hope reason would dictate sensible policy, not magical thinking about whatever far-off technological theoretical you might imagine.

I think it should be younger. Maybe 65.

Members of Congress and SCOTUS should also have term limits

Your personal disapproval of Apple’s direction does not negate their contributions.

Show me on the doll Where Apple hurt you…

I cited a couple of examples, that doesn’t mean I had to cite the entire pantheon in order to be correct.

Your lack of understanding and your narrowmindedness is not my fault.

Your hate and your personal anger against Apple is something you have to reconcile on your own.

Work out your own problems with a shrink. They have no place here.

If you can’t discuss simple technological issues without having an ego battle, it’s time to check yourself.

No shit, and I was pretty clear about how I described it in differentiating from what that project is doing from what Apple is doing. Try not to rage hate before you actually read what I said.

I’m not. And if you couldn’t tell that from what I said, then, you obviously didn’t bother to actually read it, you just made a judgment because I said the word Apple.

You clearly are either having difficulty reading what I said, or did not bother to read what I said. Nothing of what you said reflect accurately my comment. Read my comment again, and perhaps you’ll have a better understanding.

I really don’t get

I really understand that. Because you went to a great deal of effort to explain how you also went to a great deal of effort, not to understand what I went through a great deal of effort to explain. You also went to a great deal of effort to explain how you have ignored multiple sources of information, explaining what you don’t understand.

I really understand that. Because you went to a great deal of effort to explain how you also went to a great deal of effort, not to understand what I went through a great deal of effort to explain. You also went to a great deal of effort to explain how you have ignored multiple sources of information, explaining what you don’t understand.

You’ve gone to a great deal of effort to explain that you don’t understand what I said, because you ignored everything I said, and the services I provided to explain it. I can only recommend at this point that you revisit the comment you replied to two, because it provides everything to explain everything you claim to not understand.

I just hope that this time, you do it in good faith, rather than an intentional effort to sabotage further intelligent discussion.