This propagandist is even copy and pasting the same NATO glazing on this reported event now, although it‘s off-topic.
Yo, hotzplotzn, ever thought about doing something good for humanity with your life? Maybe a job that‘s not agitating against perceived western adversaries? Maybe something that‘s not furthering the division of society or the aspired militarization of western nations?
are you a sex pest, too? or why do you feel the need to be that guy in this very situation?
The choice is not between defence or welfare. Europe can afford both, and must.
Now that‘s cute, two professors advocating for the importance of social programs. I mean, in their frame of reference they are right. You know what‘s the problem? That this isn‘t reality. It‘s wishful thinking, it‘s a plea to the men in power. In reality social programs are being dismantled. But you know the trend, stop being so dishonest.
You fail to make a point.
On the other hand, (…) leave Europe with no choice other than defend itself.
For one, the post has nothing to do with Russia or NATO, it‘s not mentioned or hinted at in the article. You are the one screeching about Russia in an attempt to justify and whitewash western militarization every chance you get.
Then, you know, I know, we know, that there‘s an absolutely valid geopolitical analysis, that the West is the actual aggressor here (and almost everwhere else). And I mean actual, material analysis, not that kind of dumb fuck mass spamming of hate towards others, be it China or Russia, that you do all day … by chance exclusively the two nations directly opposed to western hegemony.
So, not sure how misleading my remarks are, especially in direct comparison with what you are doing all day long. I have a bias, true. So do you. Or are you telling us, that you are spewing objective truth? Because I am not favoring Russia‘s takes, I‘m not denying bad stuff that‘s being done, but I do oppose the Western narrative. You do favor the Western narrative and take every opportunity to post something malign about Russia or China, doesn‘t matter if true or not. So in that, I might even be less biased, than you are. Wouldn‘t you agree?
Btw, do you get paid for this kind of social media engagement? I mean, it‘s literally all you do, spamming western propaganda. Because if you don’t, then IMO your posting behaviour indicates, that you probably should go outside, touch some grass. Or at least expand your political horizons a bit in order to not be so overtly …
… misleading and biased.
Oh my, really? That is noteworthy! Almost a third! Then we should immediately start spending 5 % of our GDP on the global north‘s military industrial complex in order to make all these super cool things (non-traditional, yet still further militarization) you mentioned possible, too!
In Germany for example, that‘s only about 48 % of the whole federal budget. Absolutely the right thing to focus on, making sure capital can do capitalist things without being interfered with by mere peasants and further expand their imperial aspirations.
Fuck social programs, fuck infrastructure, fuck climate, fuck migrants, fuck accountability for the rich. We need to make sure, that profits are being made, in this case likely for the already richest man in the world. Cool cool.
It‘s so good to have your back, when it comes to propaganda gaining the right mindset, thanks! An honest, principled defender of what‘s good and what‘s right in this horrible world, riddled by evil adversaries against our cause!
So, for someone like you — with your existence‘s sole focus on posting only explicit anti-China or anti-Russia content, and often of questionable quality — what exactly do you mean, when you call someone a ‚tankie‘? Where in this post is that full force and what did this force do? Do you only use the word as a smear against unaligned voices or critics? How do you describe your role in this community — western propagandist? Or is that too upfront?
Just a reminder, that Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty are in fact US-funded, state owned media outlets.
Explain why, tho. You have a chance to do that by engaging with their arguments.
Typical leftist not understanding what winning looks like.
it is really bloody stupid to claim that it is “worse then nothing”
Not sure where to go from here, as you frame your whole comment like that and through that deconstruct any veneer of seriousness you thought you might have.
Nothing of what I said is untrue and I also assured you, that I understand your angle and laid out reasons for why I disagree with your conclusion.
But your reaction is repeating your point, ignoring the arguments laid out and adding a bit of ridicule. Really, fabulous substance.
I even agree with you, that what you proclaim as a win has a small potential to end up having a positive effect in some fictional future.
What I‘m saying is that using that possibility as foundation to call that a win (for whom, anyway? Surely not for the Palestinians) or to feel some kind of relief, because it emits that appearance that yes, finally, something has been done, is naive.
Although, with candidates like you, I also have to wonder, if it‘s really naivety or rather malice.
There is no working mechanism to hold any lying politician accountable through the nature of them having used the morally bad thing called „lie“. It really does not matter if Merz lies. Merz is a deeply insincere person, anyway, always was. How „really fucking stupid“ is it, to think that his dishonesty is a „win“, sorely because of the mere possibility, that he could end up looking like a liar. lol.
If Merz actually stopped anything, then you would have a case. What happened until now, is political maneuvering to appease the critical populus. It‘s cute that you feel like that‘s a win, I‘m saddened by your ignorance to actually call this a win.
But winning seems to be a very important aspect of your inner workings, so w/e. Have a good day.
That‘s, ya, I get what you are saying, but that‘s not a conclusion that you can claim today. It‘s really not guaranteed, like you hope. It also doesn‘t matter now, since what Merz implied is not at all, what actually happens; every possible backdoor is still open and every shipment is still being done, which in reality will further aid Israel with its genocide and therefore Germany persists in being complicit.
But what it does in reality is giving supporters of said genocide another talking point to deflect responsibility away from the German state. And it gives the regime the talking point, that it „has done something“. Although, it really hasn‘t.
And it gives people like you another reason to rationalize genocidal complicity.
Meanwhile, flights from German airports (Leipzig/Halle) continue to deliver armaments to Israel on a daily basis and forces workers to also become complicit in genocide, because it‘s not being made transparent what kind of stuff they‘re handling and as wage slaves they have little recurse against that, even if they become aware of it. They need to organise and shut down these operations, just like port workers all over europe have done already. Merz won‘t support that.
Action is needed now, stop fantasizing about future political plot twists. Humans are being slaughtered daily, and Germany remains an active participant.
It‘s not, because it‘s nothing more than a lie to calm down public sentiment. In effect, nothing changes. It‘s worse than nothing.
Nur heute: Döner 3,50 €!
Jetzt haste mich zwar zitiert, aber bist gar nicht auf den Inhalt eingegangen. Also in den meisten Einwanderungsländern (welche sind das, btw?) wird schlicht und einfach strukturelle Benachteiligung und komplizierte Bürokratie erwartet? Was?
Auch nette Allgmeinplätze die du da raussabberst, aber noch mal, warum kommentierst du explizit so, dass systemische Probleme auf Individuen abgewälzt werden? Laberst was von qualifizierten Kräften, aber verwährst Ihnen das Ankommen. Du bist ein kleiner Rassist, nicht wahr?
Das sind alles Dinge, die strukturell erschwert werden hierzulande, werter Herr IchMachMirDieWeltWieSieMirGefällt. Konzentrier dich doch mal auf solche Aspekte. Ist natürlich einfach sonst auf all die Menschen zu zeigen, die diesem Standard nicht entsprechen und Ihnen nachher Unwillen oder Faulheit zu unterstellen, nicht wahr, mein Lieber?
Du bist vor Allem ein Freund des Schönredens.
Ei naja, vielleicht ist es ein wenig wie mit der generellen Logik hinter ACAB, falls sich diese dir schon mal erschlossen hat. Falls nicht, lässt sich sicherlich recherchieren.
Wenn’s wie ne Ente aussieht, wie ne Ente läuft und wie ne Ente quakt, vielleicht ist‘s dann ja tatsächlich auch eine Ente … und siehe da, CDU und FDP haben nach dem Krieg die mit Abstand meisten Nazifunktionäre und -politiker in ihren Reihen willkommen geheißen. Das fällt heute nur nicht mehr so auf, weil die Menschen, die einst noch die NSDAP unterstützten, über die Jahrzehnte dann auch mal alle krepiert sind — Gott hab sie seelig.
Man könnte nun durchaus auch davon ausgehen, dass die heutige CDU ideologisch nach wie vor liberal konservativ geprägt ist, warum sollte sich das auch geändert haben. Das sind Parteien, welche explizit die Interessen des Kapitals durchsetzen, nicht die des Arbeiters (hier kann man nun den Punkt machen, dass das egtl. für alle Parteien in einer parlamentarischen Demokratie gilt, aber ist vll ne andere Diskussion) und an dem Machtverhältnis soll sich bitte auch nichts ändern. Faschismus wiederum ist Kapitalismus in der Krise. Guess where we are right now.
Du hast vielleicht schon mal „Scratch a Liberal, see a Nazi bleed“ irgendwo gehört. Letztendlich wird der ideologisch liberal oder konservativ eingestellte Mensch eigentlich immer die faschistische Route einschlagen, wenn man deren Weltanschauung hinterfragt, denn in Kern sind es Egoisten und Rassisten (hat er jetzt nich gesagt!). Try me.
Democratic centralism
Organization of the Chinese Communist Party